WittyMoniker2 wrote:
suckers playground wrote:
I think Thome will do the Frank Thomas tour of MLB with a couple one-year, incentive laden contracts. I don't see why the Sox would re-sign him when they're in "transition." Dye could stick around and do just as well as Thome in the DH role, with the added ability of hitting LHP. I don't buy the "lefty stick" in the lineup idea. I guess it looks nice ("it looks like baseball, dammit!"), but it doesn't really do much for me empirically, especially when you're going to end up platooning the hitter with a different guy against southpaws.
It helps that Dye has said he, too, would take a deep discount to stick with the team. I like the team's chances with him in the lineup for the next couple years over Thome.
Ideal, given what we have:
1B - Konerko
2B - Beckham
3B - Viciedo / F.A. signing (Hank Blalock, a player I've wanted the Sox to go after for years, is on a club option for 2009 and becomes available this off-season.)
SS - Alexei Ramirez
LF - Quentin
CF - Rios
RF - Mitchell / Dye
C - Pierzynski / Flowers
DH - Dye
If Kenny's serious about bringing in the new look of the team, he'll give Mitchell, Flowers, and Viciedo a real chance to make the big club out of spring training. Based on what they've accomplished thus far, they deserve the shot.
Pitching is somewhat up for grabs with the Peavy trade and possible signing / release. If I were in Kenny's shoes, my priority would be to clear the deck of all the pitchers that have been in the system for years and haven't shown much in the way of development. Whisler, Torres, Egbert, etc., these guys all need to move on. If Daniel Hudson's "the real," it would be nice to see him get a chance to start rather than join the bullpen.
Sucker's,
Appreciate your insightful thoughts. From what I've heard about this Hudson: 5th starter (with a solid 2010 Spring Training)=Hudson.
Question: who is Mitchell? And why can't the young Cuban kid be DH? Doesn't Getz deserve a chance?
I'd really love for Hudson to just get a chance at the 5th spot in the rotation, like you say. Handcuff him with a long arm out of the bullpen (like Carrasco's done this year) and keep him on an innings limit if you must, but give the guy a shot. I'm not really happy with the way many organizations have chosen to treat their pitching prospects, by slotting them into relief roles. For example, the Yankees still don't quite seem to know what to do with Joba Chamberlain. If a guy's not ready to start in the majors, let him continue to start in the minors. John Danks had 400+ innings pitched in the minor leagues and I think he was better off for it. By all accounts, Hudson seems like he's on the Lincecum / Felix Hernandez track, and neither the Giants nor the Mariners screwed around with those guys, they just let them pitch.
Mitchell is Jared Mitchell, the Sox' 1st round draft pick this year. They got him signed with relative ease and ever since he's been on the warpath in the South Atlantic League, posting a slash line of .287/.415/.448 in 87 at-bats. It's likely that he'll end up in AA Birmingham next season but I don't think he's long for the minors. The approach he's shown thus far is far more polished and mature than many would have had you think on draft day - he was labeled a "raw athlete," which in baseball tends to mean a defense-first hacker who lucks into good contact.
You're probably right that by ignoring Getz I'm being a little too hard on him, but I don't see how he figures into the team's long term plans. He's a little old for his debut and is nothing better than a bottom of the order hitter with mediocre range at any given spot in the infield. I'd take my chances on Nix or a possible F.A. signing / trade before I'd run Getz out there again full time. I think Getz, more than anyone else on the team, is why you're hearing (and reading, here) so much clamor for Chone Figgins.
I want Viciedo to be given a chance to make the team next year, but again, that has more to do with my hope that KW will live up to his word re: "transition." Viciedo hasn't been all that impressive at AA this season (he's got the worst stats of the three I mentioned), but by all accounts he's been hitting the ball really hard. What I don't like is the idea of using the DH spot on a rookie or younger player - the DH role is better served by allowing older guys who can still hit the ball a long way to get time off the field and avoid injury. Thome wouldn't be a good look in the NL at 1B but he's been great as a DH. The uglier Dye looks in the field, the better off I think he'll be in the DH slot the next couple of years.
Addendum: The issue with "transition" is that the makeup of the team has changed quite a bit over the past couple of weeks. The addition of Peavy and Rios says to me that some of these younger players we're already familiar with (Getz, Lillibridge, Nix, and even prospects like Viciedo and Jordan Danks) are going to eventually be pushed out by further bulking-up of the roster with FA / trades. Peavy doesn't come here if he's led to believe that the team's going to go into a "re-building" period, and Kenny will likely operate the way he always has, by finding value in re-treads and other organizations' missed opportunities. The problem for him might be that certain guys, Getz especially, have failed to show much worth and are no longer as attractive to other GMs as they might have been going into the season.
_________________
Douchebag wrote:
This thread is probably going to make Tim Raines want to do cocaine again.