Elmhurst Steve wrote:
:lol:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
You have yet to substanciate any claims you have made that I lied about anything where Bowling is concerned and will never be able to, because I never did lie.
You did lie though, or at least you misrepresented yourself because you didn't do it in a sanctioned league. Calling Chus ignorant would be unfair, unless of course you were simply stating he was ignorant to you misrepresenting yourself as scoring that in an official capacity.
As I explained, the difference between a sanctioned league and unsanctioned league, is it doesn't pay fees to the USBC and therefore does not get any awards for accomplishments made in the league. Thats it, no difference in oil patterns or scoring (done by computers)or anthing else. Since the claim was to have garnered the highest average in the league I had bowled in, again...there is no misrepresentation.
Chus TRIES to discredit the accomplishment by naming the only 3 women in our league by name amongst 40 bowlers :lol:

. He talks about looking at my Bowling results every week this past season.....more than a bit stalkerish. Like probably a lot of people here, I looked at Bowling as a sport (hobby, whatever) as something you only do when you get older. Basketball, Baseball (and softball) Football and golf were things I chose to involve myself in. But 6 years ago, I got talked into joining a Bowling league by 3 guys I played Softball with, who were in that league. So as I have improved a bit and achieved a few things (winning the league 2 years in a row, having a 700 series-yes-this WAS in a sanctioned league) I posted about these things because it was exciting to have a week where I had averaged 235 and felt good aout having done that. But I never said I was a great bowler, only that I had some accomplishments from time to time that I chose to share. Oh, and Chus also cannot dispute the fact that I averaged 194 IN A SANCTIONED LEAGUE in 2009. He just likes to post the negative stuff. Just like when he chose to post below average games in a week where there was a 230's 240's game also bowled, but he chose to leave that game out of his post

There was never any misrepresentation made by me, I leave that kinda crap to others.

You were thumping your chest about being an awesome bowler. You wanted people to think that you were a big shot, just like when you called the Score from Mac's basement. You tried to get on the muscle with Frank, and that backfired. Now, bowling is just something that you do as recreation. My, how your tune has changed.
Previously, I did give you credit for your 194, as I listed all of your averages, including many in the 170's. I have never lied or misled anybody about your scores. When you deserved credit, it was given to you. When it was time to call you out on bullshit, I did. Even at the bowling event, some people were joking that anybody that shot higher than 135, which you shot the previous week, had crossed the "Elmhurst Steve threshold". I corrected them, and said that was only one game, and that you averaged near 180. I have been more than fair with you, Steve.
Again, if 194 is the top average, then you are beating inferior competition. This was my original point two years ago. You disputed it, despite me having the evidence to back up my claim. This whole thing could have been avoided, had you not claimed that I was ignorant, and lying.
Thank you for finally admitting that you were bragging about beating women.