FavreFan wrote:
But what you're saying is equally meaningless. "Top talent" doesn't usually become available. Before this year Golden State never attracted a top FA. The Knicks haven't for 20 years outside of Amare. Same with Celtics and Horford. Etc.
So if you admit that being a legacy franchise in a top three market is meaningless, does that mean I was in fact being objective during my earlier pessimistic posts? You said I wasn't being objective.
long time guy wrote:
How does signing either of those two kill long term hopes? Regardless of the motives they improved the team. ONce again if you are not going to trade Butler (which most on here don't) then you have to improve the team. There weren't many moves that could have been done last off season which would have made the Bulls instant contenders. It is asanine to constantly focus on that. The Bulls gave up nothing to acquire either and aside for a few draft slots what was really lost.
I think that you would have preferred that they not sign them so that your Anti Hoiberg stance could have been further solidified.
A shitty Butler complaining about his lack of supporting cast isn't something that i looked forward to.
I never said they killed long-term hopes - I said the signings weren't indicative of a long-term plan. What improvement is there? They were 42-40 last year and are on pace for the same record this year. That's not improvement - that's stagnation. Congratulations, if that's your thing, but I don't want stagnation - I want progress, even if incremental. There is no progress. I am not advocating for moves that make the Bulls "instant contenders," mainly because such moves are exceedingly rare to pull off. Realistically, I am advocating for, obviously, better drafting and smarter free agent signings, such as young pieces that you may be able to mold into something useful, or young vets that you can use in the present and then possibly trade for better assets in the future.
Quote:
I think that you would have preferred that they not sign them so that your Anti Hoiberg stance could have been further solidified.
I don't give a shit about Hoiberg - it's obvious to everyone that he's way in over his head. As I said, the signings don't make sense from a strategic point of view. From your scout's angle, it might make sense because Rondo jibes really well with the second unit, and Wade does a lot of nice weak side stuff. For me, I say who gives a shit - the team is .500, is going nowhere, and trading Rondo/Wade isn't going to get you anything. So they're dead weight.