It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:58 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

Is Jerry Reinsdorf Cheap?
Yes 69%  69%  [ 22 ]
No 31%  31%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 32
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Reinsdorf is the front man but I don't know that he even owns 10% of the team(s). It's not really a Jerry Jones or Mark Cuban or Ricketts type of thing...maybe his partners are keeping the purse strings tight.


Another cromulent point.

Looks like he owns 19% of the Sox and 40% of the Bulls.

So we're fucked even if/when he dies? That's a bummer.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
If and when they ever cash out these guys are going to receive a helluva return on their investment. They initially purchased the team for about 11 mil. even if you factor in inflation the value of the franchise has increased exponentially since then.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Ok, I wont tell you.

Ill simply ask this. If there was a different owner there in those years, do you think they win less titles? What exactly did Reinsdorf do?
He hired/didn't fire the people who won 6/6.5 titles in a row with Jordan.

rogers park bryan wrote:
And I find it difficult in general to know the amount of credit to give any owners when they have success, so this is more just my view overall.
We are comparing them to other owners, including those who had similarly historic players even if not quite as good as Jordan was. I guess if your answer is that owners don't really matter then why are we mad at him for being bad at being an owner the past 10 or so years?

I can still recognize an owner being cheap. And I am largely talking White Sox.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I can still recognize an owner being cheap. And I am largely talking White Sox.
You almost completely discounted the 6 titles with Jordan. I don't think you were talking about the White Sox.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
This thread has (((dangerous undertones)))

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6872
FavreFan wrote:
He just needs to employ the greatest athlete and greatest coach ever and then he will pay them fair market price! Not cheap! Fantastic evidence guys.


And then dismantle the team when the profit numbers started to decline because of increasing payrolls.

You think the owner of the Patriots would ever think of dismantling the team, the way the Bulls did?

Pathetic excuse for an owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I can still recognize an owner being cheap. And I am largely talking White Sox.
You almost completely discounted the 6 titles with Jordan. I don't think you were talking about the White Sox.

I dont think NBA owners really deserve credit. That's why I took issue with that part of it. But cheapness is really hard to define in a league with a salary cap, so I think this discussion is largely based on what he did with the Sox.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
What he does with the Sox is cheap.

Then again, you have to have revenue to spend money.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:54 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.


I think they allow him to run the basketball operation and I think they're allowed to control the purse strings. I think the 98 Bulls broke up because they didn't want to pay the guys to come back. I think there were a number of guys on expiring deals and they would have had to go significantly over the cap to bring them all back. I sort of remember it that way.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
I think breaking up the Bulls was more about stupidity than money. They wanted to avoid a long rebuild after a dynasty like had happened to others.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He was an amazing owner but something happened after 2005 that made him pretty complacent which explains his undeserved loyalty to certain guys.

Paul Konerko gave him the world-series-winning game ball. That probably made him melt inside.

Also, I thought Jerry was notoriously hands-off and always let his sports people do their thing, one of the reasons he garnered the loyalty that tends to go bidirectional.... Then again I doubt that other teams are beating down the door to get a piece of GarPax or Kenny Will.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.


I think they allow him to run the basketball operation and I think they're allowed to control the purse strings. I think the 98 Bulls broke up because they didn't want to pay the guys to come back. I think there were a number of guys on expiring deals and they would have had to go significantly over the cap to bring them all back. I sort of remember it that way.


And Krause had spent quite a bit of effort to shift the narrative that that team had run its course and was coming apart over nebulous "stuff". The all but unquestioned inevitability of that should have kept that bastard out of the HOF, whether he scouted Pearl Monroe or not. :roll:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
sinicalypse wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He was an amazing owner but something happened after 2005 that made him pretty complacent which explains his undeserved loyalty to certain guys.

Paul Konerko gave him the world-series-winning game ball. That probably made him melt inside.


I was telling a friend of mine who is not a baseball fan about Konerko handing him the ball and Jerry saying it was the greatest moment in his life. My friend sneered and she asked, "Has he been married? Does he have kids?" I said, "Yeah, but most people get married and have kids. How many get handed the ball from the final out of the World Series by Paul Konerko?" She laughed and had to admit that was right.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Regular Reader wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.


I think they allow him to run the basketball operation and I think they're allowed to control the purse strings. I think the 98 Bulls broke up because they didn't want to pay the guys to come back. I think there were a number of guys on expiring deals and they would have had to go significantly over the cap to bring them all back. I sort of remember it that way.


And Krause had spent quite a bit of effort to shift the narrative that that team had run its course and was coming apart over nebulous "stuff". The all but unquestioned inevitability of that should have kept that bastard out of the HOF, whether he scouted Pearl Monroe or not. :roll:


Jackson wasn't coming back if Krause was still in charge; Phil wanted more say over personnel decisions. MJ and Scottie couldn't change Phil's mind.

We saw how great of a job Phil did with the Knicks :roll:

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Regular Reader wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Calling Reinsdorf cheap is lazy. His spending habits, philosophies etc are clear without resorting to lazy. They are also pretty different Sox to Bulls.

No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.


I think they allow him to run the basketball operation and I think they're allowed to control the purse strings. I think the 98 Bulls broke up because they didn't want to pay the guys to come back. I think there were a number of guys on expiring deals and they would have had to go significantly over the cap to bring them all back. I sort of remember it that way.


And Krause had spent quite a bit of effort to shift the narrative that that team had run its course and was coming apart over nebulous "stuff". The all but unquestioned inevitability of that should have kept that bastard out of the HOF, whether he scouted Pearl Monroe or not. :roll:


I think you guys are both misremembering a bit. It was really about Jackson, a fucking backstabber who wanted the job of the guy who pulled him off the Albany Patroons' bus and into the big leagues. Phil refused to come back unless he was GM/coach. And Jordan wasn't coming back if Phil wasn't there. The breakup of that team is squarely on Phil and Jordan.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
sinicalypse wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
He was an amazing owner but something happened after 2005 that made him pretty complacent which explains his undeserved loyalty to certain guys.

Paul Konerko gave him the world-series-winning game ball. That probably made him melt inside.


I was telling a friend of mine who is not a baseball fan about Konerko handing him the ball and Jerry saying it was the greatest moment in his life. My friend sneered and she asked, "Has he been married? Does he have kids?" I said, "Yeah, but most people get married and have kids. How many get handed the ball from the final out of the World Series by Paul Konerko?" She laughed and had to admit that was right.


Yeah, he was a HUGE Brooklyn Dodgers fan. I'm sure the family understood where he was coming from.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
No he's a cheap motherfucker. We're from Chicago mike, not Cleveland, Tampa Bay, or Oklahoma City.


It might be because he is beholden to the other shareholders. I remember the Bulls having something like 27 other owners back in the day. I think Reinsdorf only owned less than 10%. He was just the face of the franchise. I think there were others that owned a higher percentage. Maybe they were the ones pulling the strings all along.



I don't know about pulling the strings, but there is certainly something to what you say. I don't think he's making unilateral decisions without discussing it with his guys. But for the most part they seem willing to follow him. He's made them a ton of money. The Sox are worth a whole lot more now than when they bought the team. And he signed that ridiculous stadium deal. The Bulls printed money. They still do even if it's not as much as it was in the Jordan years. I think if he wants to spend money with the Sox he is capable of twisting arms and having guys fall in line, especially when most of the guys have gotten fat under Jerry's leadership of the Bulls.


I think they allow him to run the basketball operation and I think they're allowed to control the purse strings. I think the 98 Bulls broke up because they didn't want to pay the guys to come back. I think there were a number of guys on expiring deals and they would have had to go significantly over the cap to bring them all back. I sort of remember it that way.


And Krause had spent quite a bit of effort to shift the narrative that that team had run its course and was coming apart over nebulous "stuff". The all but unquestioned inevitability of that should have kept that bastard out of the HOF, whether he scouted Pearl Monroe or not. :roll:


I think you guys are both misremembering a bit. It was really about Jackson, a fucking backstabber who wanted the job of the guy who pulled him off the Albany Patroons' bus and into the big leagues. Phil refused to come back unless he was GM/coach. And Jordan wasn't coming back if Phil wasn't there. The breakup of that team is squarely on Phil and Jordan.


Three words: "Organizations win championships"

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?

I do. Great players win them. If an organization shows itself incapable of getting another one with different great players I think it’s fair to invoke luck into the discussion at that point. Organizations like the Steelers and Celtics win championships. The Bulls got lucky they drafted the best player ever.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think you guys are both misremembering a bit. It was really about Jackson, a fucking backstabber who wanted the job of the guy who pulled him off the Albany Patroons' bus and into the big leagues. Phil refused to come back unless he was GM/coach. And Jordan wasn't coming back if Phil wasn't there. The breakup of that team is squarely on Phil and Jordan.


Its why I never cared for Phil. He snaked Doug Collins in order to get the job and learned how cultivating relationships with All Time Great Players (Jordan Kobe Shaq) was the key to remaining gainfully employed. Whether a person likes or loathes Krause the shit that he did to him was borderline criminal. He created the toxic environment surrounding the team and was the forerunner in turning the players against management.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?


Yes and no. Jerry West would as well as he's constructed two, and is working on a third. Organizations have to be able to let the creatives work without interference.

Although in fairness, the boss banging Phil turned into a problem for West in LA.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?

I do. Great players win them. If an organization shows itself incapable of getting another one with different great players I think it’s fair to invoke luck into the discussion at that point. Organizations like the Steelers and Celtics win championships. The Bulls got lucky they drafted the best player ever.


... and Jordan might not have won any championships without HoGrant and Pip for the first three and a bunch of players for the second three. The second three-peat had deeeeep talent and a lot of guys who were the best in the league at what they do (Kerr, Rodman, Kukoc).

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?

I do. Great players win them. If an organization shows itself incapable of getting another one with different great players I think it’s fair to invoke luck into the discussion at that point. Organizations like the Steelers and Celtics win championships. The Bulls got lucky they drafted the best player ever.


... and Jordan might not have won any championships without HoGrant and Pip for the first three and a bunch of players for the second three. The second three-peat had deeeeep talent and a lot of guys who were the best in the league at what they do (Kerr, Rodman, Kukoc).

Sure. If you want to use that to say Krause is/was an underrated GM I won’t argue. I think the distinct lack of success for two decades and counting now since then means you necessarily can’t give Reinsdorf much credit for that. If the Bulls organization was responsible for those six titles and not Jordan and Pippen then two decades is enough time to prove you can at least make it back to one Finals series.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
they would have been better off with an owner in a vegetative state.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

72 (and 10) more pages


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:39 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
Three words: "Organizations win championships"


Do you disagree with that?

I do. Great players win them. If an organization shows itself incapable of getting another one with different great players I think it’s fair to invoke luck into the discussion at that point. Organizations like the Steelers and Celtics win championships. The Bulls got lucky they drafted the best player ever.


... and Jordan might not have won any championships without HoGrant and Pip for the first three and a bunch of players for the second three. The second three-peat had deeeeep talent and a lot of guys who were the best in the league at what they do (Kerr, Rodman, Kukoc).

Sure. If you want to use that to say Krause is/was an underrated GM I won’t argue. I think the distinct lack of success for two decades and counting now since then means you necessarily can’t give Reinsdorf much credit for that. If the Bulls organization was responsible for those six titles and not Jordan and Pippen then two decades is enough time to prove you can at least make it back to one Finals series.



I think those are two different arguments though. There are scenarios where Jordan could have played his whole career without winning a championship and nobody would be talking about him as the "greatest of all-time." The fact that he was surrounded with not just good or great players, but the right players, was important. And the organization did that. The fact that it was incapable of doing it again doesn't take that fact away. If Jordan were left to his own devices he would have been trying to win championships with Charles Oakley and Walter Davis. He's lucky Krause didn't allow that.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
rogers park bryan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

72 (and 10) more pages


Still only about 10% of that which is consumed by the DiCaro thread.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group