Seacrest wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
All of seacrest's PMs are just pissy passive aggressive threats and invitation to "go say that in Garfield park " which is to me more offensive as it is suggesting African American residents there are quick to violence.
Don't let them bully you Hawk.
Feel free to post your response!!
"Conversations" with CrestSeacrest wrote:
I think you have been posting some things here lately that you wouldn't let escape your lips near say, 63rd and Cottage Grove.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Um ok? Thanks for the heads up. I normally don't go south of 290.
Outside of the "thats racist" gif and the go back to Africa comment, was there something I missed?
Seacrest wrote:
So do you go into K-town and make racially charged statements? Or Garfield park?
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
I love Douglas Park Mini Golf and Koreans. So no.
I try to stay south of Howard. East of Austin and north of 290. I don't need weaves, BBQ, or pigs feet.
Sarcasm aside, you really don't like me do you?
Seacrest wrote:
Why do you think I don’t like you? Are you unable to communicate directly with others so you use sarcasm?
Do you have PTSD, or are you one who normally feels picked on your way through life?
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Stop trying to psycho analyze me. I am facetious because I I found your line of questioning to be unnecessary. The situations sound like Jon McClane and the sandwich board in Die Hard 3. You equate a couple gifs to me walking through Skokie with a KKK hood on.
The board doesn't have a racism problem. It had a selective outrage problem.
And PTSD? Painting with such broad brushstrokes is low.
Seacrest wrote:
I'm not trying to psychoanalyze you, just trying to find a reason that somehow negates some of the intentional racially charged nonsense you have posted lately.
No one equated anything but you. There is a theme starting to appear. That you are somehow a victim here.
PTSD was a question, not a brush stroke.
Elmhurst Steve and chas have been far more openly racist in some of their posts and have stopped them altogether when asked to.
Here's hoping that you do the same.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
I'm not changing or going anywhere. If it bothers you then it is within your right to ban me. Thanks for reaching out. Sorry we couldn't be more productive.
Seacrest wrote:
Elmhurst and chas were asked not post anything they wouldn't say in broad daylight to a group of black men in Englewood.
Same offer is now being made to you.
And if you won't go south of 290, we can amend it to a group of Black Disciples in the 4300 block of Washington Blvd.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Blow it out your ass
Seacrest wrote:
I didn't think you would.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
I'm not going to censor myself for you. And why Englewood? Are you insinutating I would be the victim of violence? That sounds like a prejudiced stereotype. Why do you think blacks are violent seacrest?
Sorry you didn't get the roll over and piss on myself sign of surrender you wanted when you began haranguing me via pm.
You would be the only Wiseman to operate such a way
Seacrest wrote:
Victim again?
I'm clearly saying that you would type any number of things and avoid having to say them directly to an African American's males face.
I'm pretty sure you agree.
Chapter 2.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
I'm asking you again to please refrain from spewing your racial hatred here.
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
So long story short, Seacrest has a fetish for picturing groups of overtly violent black males and seeing them wish harm on those he doesn't like. Please pray for him so that he can overcome his bigoted thinking.
Long story short, no one here is surprised that you wouldn't stand up for your "principles" in real life.