It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 1:25 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

WORST ALLEGED OR CONFIRMED MLB 'ROIDERS?
Total votes : 0
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
this is silly. world class athletes of all shape and form have been using performance enhancing drugs since the 60s if not earlier. to think they don't help you run faster, swing faster, throw harder is silly. silly silly silly. I will leave it at that.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I thought the whole thing with HGH was that it gave some of these guys increased bat speed so there were able to hit the ball a little further. A juiced ball helped with that a little bit too, along with smaller ballparks no doubt. But it also meant that some of those lazy flyballs they would normally hit now were going into the 2nd or 3rd row of seats in the bleachers.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I thought the whole thing with HGH was that it gave some of these guys increased bat speed so there were able to hit the ball a little further. A juiced ball helped with that a little bit too, along with smaller ballparks no doubt. But it also meant that some of those lazy flyballs they would normally hit now were going into the 2nd or 3rd row of seats in the bleachers.

Sure, but that's just another way of phrasing it. Bat speed was quicker because they were stronger. Power and strength aren't exactly the same thing but they are pretty highly correlated.

One way to think about it is Olympic lifting. Olympic lifting isn't about being strong, exactly, but generating enough speed to get the weight into position on your shoulders or over your head. But the stronger you are the easier it is to do that.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
These types of studies have been done:

It is suggested that strength training in combination with administration of androgenic-anabolic steroids causes improvements in selected neuromuscular parameters. These changes may be greater than those of caused by the strength training alone.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6524396

and

Analysis of these studies suggests that most persons will gain an average of 2.2 kg of lean body weight during steroid administration but that there exist great individual differences in strength changes induced by steroids. Approximately 50% of the investigations show significant improvements in strength measurements with steroid treatment, whereas the remainder show indefinite effects.

Yes, you're just repeating what I'm saying. Steroids are a great assistant to helping you get stronger. But these guys weren't that strong. Big, yes. Strong, no. If they were benching 2.5 times their body weight and squatting 650 I'd fully agree with you. But their results were something an ordinary guy or a high school kid can do with the right program in a couple of years (if even). I'm sure steroids helped get them there quicker, and they were probably stronger than they would have been given their crappy workout regiments. But their results are easily attainable, and are attained all the time. Yet the homeruns aren't happening.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57231
So if Steroids do not really accomplish anything beneficial to the game of baseball then why are/were guys going to such great lengths to use them?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:08 pm
Posts: 2139
pizza_Place: Lucano's
redskingreg wrote:
It's well known that Kapler is into bodybuilding too.


So are you agreeing with me or defending Kapler?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Q.Bovifs wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So if Steroids do not really accomplish anything beneficial to the game of baseball then why are/were guys going to such great lengths to use them?

Because, although they shrink your balls, they make your cock bigger. (just kidding, I don't know if there is a direct correlation, although one dude on my friend's softball team did claim this).

perception

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65751
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Well I think Elmhurst Steve's Softball Hall of Fame should ban that guy. Only way to keep the integrity of the sport intact.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
During the additional six week programmed training without hormone drugs significant (p less than 0.05) increases were observed in the experimental group in addition to maximal isometric force and the squat-lift but also in isometric fast force production, while the corresponding changes in the control group were minor (NS).. It is suggested that strength training in combination with administration of androgenic-anabolic steroids causes improvements in selected neuromuscular parameters. These changes may be greater than those of caused by the strength training alone
.
Yes, multiple things improved more quickly in the steroids users. They squatted more, and they also had quicker isometric fast force production at the end of six weeks. This isn't a shock. Powerlifters use them for a reason.
RFDC wrote:
So if Steroids do not really accomplish anything beneficial to the game of baseball then why are/were guys going to such great lengths to use them?

1.) Most baseball players train like shit, and because of that they reach the limits of their training at very low levels of potential. Steroids allowed them to do better while still training like shit.

2.) Some players on steroids started doing very well for themselves after starting. As soon as some guys saw that they all wanted in on the action.

3.) Athletes don't need science to do something they think well help, or else they wouldn't do half the stupid things they do, like cork their bats and wear magnetic bracelets.

4.) The effects of steroids, especially with bodybuilder-style training, are very visual. Steroids help allow hypertrophy since you can work the muscles more. But the exercises that create big muscles aren't always the ones that make you strong. Back to point number one.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57231
ok just trying to make sure I grasp where you are coming from. So you would attribute Brady Anderson and L. Gonz going crazy at the plate during those years as more to do with a live ball rather than anything they were taking into their bodies?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
RFDC wrote:
ok just trying to make sure I grasp where you are coming from. So you would attribute Brady Anderson and L. Gonz going crazy at the plate during those years as more to do with a live ball rather than anything they were taking into their bodies?

Do you think Luis freaking Gonzalez is stronger than Ryan Howard or the guys today? Guys like Gonzalez should be a reason for people to pause on all the steroid talk and start thinking about the other possibilities.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57231
Irish Boy wrote:
RFDC wrote:
ok just trying to make sure I grasp where you are coming from. So you would attribute Brady Anderson and L. Gonz going crazy at the plate during those years as more to do with a live ball rather than anything they were taking into their bodies?

Do you think Luis freaking Gonzalez is stronger than Ryan Howard or the guys today? Guys like Gonzalez should be a reason for people to pause on all the steroid talk and start thinking about the other possibilities.


That is a good point. This has been eye opening for me today. Good stuff IB, see we need you around here.

So then in your opinion do guys like McGuire deserve to be in the HOF?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Q.Bovifs wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Quote:
During the additional six week programmed training without hormone drugs significant (p less than 0.05) increases were observed in the experimental group in addition to maximal isometric force and the squat-lift but also in isometric fast force production, while the corresponding changes in the control group were minor (NS).. It is suggested that strength training in combination with administration of androgenic-anabolic steroids causes improvements in selected neuromuscular parameters. These changes may be greater than those of caused by the strength training alone
.
Yes, multiple things improved more quickly in the steroids users. They squatted more, and they also had quicker isometric fast force production at the end of six weeks. This isn't a shock. Powerlifters use them for a reason.
RFDC wrote:
So if Steroids do not really accomplish anything beneficial to the game of baseball then why are/were guys going to such great lengths to use them?

1.) Most baseball players train like shit, and because of that they reach the limits of their training at very low levels of potential. Steroids allowed them to do better while still training like shit.

2.) Some players on steroids started doing very well for themselves after starting. As soon as some guys saw that they all wanted in on the action.

3.) Athletes don't need science to do something they think well help, or else they wouldn't do half the stupid things they do, like cork their bats and wear magnetic bracelets.

4.) The effects of steroids, especially with bodybuilder-style training, are very visual. Steroids help allow hypertrophy since you can work the muscles more. But the exercises that create big muscles aren't always the ones that make you strong. Back to point number one.

These are pretty good points, but weren't we originally arguing Juiced Balls as being the main reason (vs. PED use) for the increase in power production for some recent superstar ballplayers? I was not disagreeing with the proposition that the equipment was rigged, but I was saying that, relevant to their non-using peers (even the ones who pump iron), the users show enhanced, measurable effects. To a hitter, isometric fast force production is more important than brute strength.

See my point about Olympic weightlifting to Frank above. It is no surprise that both improved more in the steroids group. That's what steroids do. I'm saying that when you're not close to genetic potential, what difference does it make? With Mark McGwire's frame he could have benched 600 pounds with sufficient training and steroids. Hell, he could have benched 400 without steroids.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
RFDC wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
RFDC wrote:
ok just trying to make sure I grasp where you are coming from. So you would attribute Brady Anderson and L. Gonz going crazy at the plate during those years as more to do with a live ball rather than anything they were taking into their bodies?

Do you think Luis freaking Gonzalez is stronger than Ryan Howard or the guys today? Guys like Gonzalez should be a reason for people to pause on all the steroid talk and start thinking about the other possibilities.


That is a good point. This has been eye opening for me today. Good stuff IB, see we need you around here.

So then in your opinion do guys like McGuire deserve to be in the HOF?

I do, but I'd think that even if steroids really were a wonder drug. It's just too hard to sort through the mess. That was the era, for better or worse.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
spanky wrote:
How was Randy Johnson implicated? Dude was like 6' 10", 122 lbs.


His mullet had to be grown using something. It was just too perfect.


Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The thread could have been titled "Champions of the steroid era" rather than worst offenders. Heck, it was entertaining as hell. I don't blame any of them for using, it was an attempt by each to maximize their abilities for the benefit of their teams as well as themselves. It also made watching the games a lot of fun. Sure it cheapened the numbers accumulated by the previous greats of the game and allowed Bonds to pass Aaron for the home run totals, but it was a lot of fun to watch.The game is supposed to entertain the crowds watching it. The game was never more entertaining.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
but it was a lot of fun to watch.The game is supposed to entertain the crowds watching it. The game was never more entertaining.


no

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group