It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4899 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 164  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:02 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I saw some things that gave me a little hope from Fields in the 2nd half. Lance looks unbelievably raw. Like he's still a couple of years away.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82221
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


You cannot. However, he was clearly a system guy. Once the league caught up to him, he didn't adjust and went the way of the dinosaur. So he did have that moment in time of genius but that was a long time ago and didn't qualify him as a modern expert on QB play

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Don't disagree at all and I didn't suggest he's relevant today either. His rigidity and lack of humility was his undoing. A smarter person knows when he's been checkmated and then goes back to the drawing board to reinvent his craft. Martz didn't.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 11:53 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


You cannot. However, he was clearly a system guy. Once the league caught up to him, he didn't adjust and went the way of the dinosaur. So he did have that moment in time of genius but that was a long time ago and didn't qualify him as a modern expert on QB play


You don't have to be an expert to identify good and bad traits/play from a quarterback. Besides, he acknowledged Lamar Jackson's style of play. In addition to that, experts get it wrong every draft.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
The only statement I take exception to is "worst opening day performance I've ever seen". That's a bit harsh. Outside of that, his specific call on his play wasn't wrong. Fields wasn't good.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:22 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BigW72 wrote:
The only statement I take exception to is "worst opening day performance I've ever seen". That's a bit harsh. Outside of that, his specific call on his play wasn't wrong. Fields wasn't good.


Fields is a walking contradiction. He looks worse than a high school quarterback on a lot of plays but can also turn things around on a dime because he has a ton of physical ability.

He won't be the starter next year if he can't learn how to play within the constraints of an NFL system on plays where freelancing isn't necessary.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19044
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
blackhawksfan wrote:
:lol:



More like Mike Fartz

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 12:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Sean Payton has the same opinion about Lance.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/jimmy-garo ... 05971.html

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:03 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
IMO you have to take anything Martz says about the Bears with a grain of salt. He likely still has an axe to grind with the organization.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4077
pizza_Place: Lino's
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


They started five pro bowlers on offense, and Marshall Faulk had an incredible year. If you watch games from back then you see Pace was able to single up and dominate his guy on nearly every play, so they kept at TE in on the right side, and the guy who bagged your groceries at Hy-Vee (no Dominick's in Iowa), looked for Bruce on every play, and dumped off to Faulk who made the first guy miss most of the time.

How did that work on the 2010 Bears without Pace, Faulk, Holt, and Bruce? Cutler was sacked 52 times in 15 games.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4077
pizza_Place: Lino's
Nas wrote:
Sean Payton has the same opinion about Lance.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/jimmy-garo ... 05971.html


No way Lance makes it through the year if he takes the number of hits he did on Sunday every week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Clawmaster wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


They started five pro bowlers on offense, and Marshall Faulk had an incredible year. If you watch games from back then you see Pace was able to single up and dominate his guy on nearly every play, so they kept at TE in on the right side, and the guy who bagged your groceries at Hy-Vee (no Dominick's in Iowa), looked for Bruce on every play, and dumped off to Faulk who made the first guy miss most of the time.

How did that work on the 2010 Bears without Pace, Faulk, Holt, and Bruce? Cutler was sacked 52 times in 15 games.


This seems to be a great point to make against someone arguing Martz was an effective OC in 2010. When you find that person do let me know.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Warner got knocked around a bit with the Rams too if memory serves.. he even commented that it effected his play with the Giants (concussions and so on). He got sorted out a bit better with Arizona but I do recall Warner being critical of how long it took plays to develop in the Martz offense.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
I’d also add that it would as Belichick that used the long play development of the Martz offense to his advantage by instructing his DB’s to put hands on the Rams WR’s early and often to disrupt the rhythm of the offense rendering it ineffective.. this also resulted in the NFL changing receiver ‘chucking’ rules by DB’s later on..

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 3:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
I saw some things that gave me a little hope from Fields in the 2nd half. Lance looks unbelievably raw. Like he's still a couple of years away.




Lance looked lost when he had to make a quick decision. His processing speed is incredibly low right now. But like Fields, he has talent. Fields is definitely further along than Lance is tho. Fields however doesn’t have the talent around him that Lance does.. our line looked better in the 2nd half, but was absolutely terrible in the 1st.


To me, this offense is going to go as that line goes.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23837
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese


Fields: “Please stop late hitting me.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
KDdidit wrote:


Fields: “Please stop late hitting me.”




Fields does slide quite a bit tho.. I was actually surprised on some of those hits at the lack of defenders trying to pull up at all.. Lance on the other hand was leaning shoulders/head 1st quite a bit when he ran which he’ll have to learn not to do.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2022 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.

Gilbride had a nice run as the Giants OC, winning a couple Super Bowls in the process. He had a good ability to adjust to the strengths of his personnel, some years on the ground and others through the air. Those were the good old days.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4077
pizza_Place: Lino's
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


They started five pro bowlers on offense, and Marshall Faulk had an incredible year. If you watch games from back then you see Pace was able to single up and dominate his guy on nearly every play, so they kept at TE in on the right side, and the guy who bagged your groceries at Hy-Vee (no Dominick's in Iowa), looked for Bruce on every play, and dumped off to Faulk who made the first guy miss most of the time.

How did that work on the 2010 Bears without Pace, Faulk, Holt, and Bruce? Cutler was sacked 52 times in 15 games.


This seems to be a great point to make against someone arguing Martz was an effective OC in 2010. When you find that person do let me know.


Your guy Matt Nagy was coach of the year once. The discussion was if Martz is an effective judge of QB talent and I gave you the metric he uses, a pocket passer who hangs in there until he gets hammered, also pointed out that he had an extraordinary amount of offensive talent at key skill positions which allowed for the success of the QB he uses as his metric. Sorry for the argument getting a little complicated, but if you gonna die on the Martz is a great evaluator of QB talent then have at it General Vegan Fan, but it looks like you may need to shore up your right flank as the Barbarians are breaking through the front line.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 9:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Clawmaster wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
He's a chuck and duck guy, only likes pocket passers and hates mobile guys like Fields.

He also sees TE's as extra OT's, same guy that convinced them to trade Greg Olson, his offense worked because he stumbled upon HOF HC, QB, OT, WR, and RB, also had a second WR that is borderline HOF, it was a rare gathering of offensive talent.

Still remember watching elderly Buddy Ryan punch another chuck and duck guy Kevin Gilbride, those type OC's tend to think they reinvented the wheel, but there is a reason you do not see every NFL team running their offenses.

Think I heard he is working on a book, so likely trying to get his name out there to sell books.


I agree Martz is rigid and out of touch. However I think it's lazy thinking to dismiss his success because he had "HOF" talent. This is the same thing that's said of Phil Jackson and others and it's equally as wrong. All of Martz's players at the time were not hall of famers. His QB most recently bagged your carrots and milk at the local Dominick's. Holt was a rookie and Bruce was good but had never seen team success. Faulk was a legit stud. Like Jackson, Martz found a way to optimize all of their talents in a way that they hadn't collectively done before. While Martz is arrogant and unfair, you can't take what he accomplished away from him.


They started five pro bowlers on offense, and Marshall Faulk had an incredible year. If you watch games from back then you see Pace was able to single up and dominate his guy on nearly every play, so they kept at TE in on the right side, and the guy who bagged your groceries at Hy-Vee (no Dominick's in Iowa), looked for Bruce on every play, and dumped off to Faulk who made the first guy miss most of the time.

How did that work on the 2010 Bears without Pace, Faulk, Holt, and Bruce? Cutler was sacked 52 times in 15 games.


This seems to be a great point to make against someone arguing Martz was an effective OC in 2010. When you find that person do let me know.


Your guy Matt Nagy was coach of the year once. The discussion was if Martz is an effective judge of QB talent and I gave you the metric he uses, a pocket passer who hangs in there until he gets hammered, also pointed out that he had an extraordinary amount of offensive talent at key skill positions which allowed for the success of the QB he uses as his metric. Sorry for the argument getting a little complicated, but if you gonna die on the Martz is a great evaluator of QB talent then have at it General Vegan Fan, but it looks like you may need to shore up your right flank as the Barbarians are breaking through the front line.


To me, the key point here is that Martz is very much a system guy, and he sees a guy in Fields who currently is incapable of playing within a system (reading quickly, throwing in rhythm, etc). I think we all see that. I'd say it's pretty shocking how undeveloped Fields' skills are in this regard.

What Martz doesn't seem to acknowledge is that Fields also shows the ability to transcend a given offensive system and make explosive plays as a freelancer.

The problem is that we do not yet see in Fields a synthesis of a system player with a freelancer. If he remains strictly a freelance player through the rest of the season, the Bears will be drafting a QB in the first round next year. If he can significantly improve his success rate as a system QB while maintaining his explosive playmaking abilities as a freelancer, he will be a very good or better starter for the Bears.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4077
pizza_Place: Lino's
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Clawmaster wrote:
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Herbert did much more with his carries than Montgomery did. I hope his load is increased against Green Bay. Montgomery just doesn't seem to see openings as well as Herbert does.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 15, 2022 11:39 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tall Midget wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Herbert did much more with his carries than Montgomery did. I hope his load is increased against Green Bay. Montgomery just doesn't seem to see openings as well as Herbert does.


Quickness is imperative in a zone blocking scheme. Herbert is much quicker then Montgomery.

I liked how Getsy pounded them with Montgomery, and finished it off with Herbert.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 11:21 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Martz appeared to say Fields ceiling is Cutler when he was on Parkins and Spiegs. I think I'm going to be sick.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38691
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Martz appeared to say Fields ceiling is Cutler when he was on Parkins and Spiegs. I think I'm going to be sick.


He wont even hit that ceiling.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 12:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Herbert did much more with his carries than Montgomery did. I hope his load is increased against Green Bay. Montgomery just doesn't seem to see openings as well as Herbert does.


Quickness is imperative in a zone blocking scheme. Herbert is much quicker then Montgomery.

I liked how Getsy pounded them with Montgomery, and finished it off with Herbert.


I don't think Getsy "pounded" the defense with Montgomery since he's not really a power runner. Rather, I just think Montgomery wasted time behind the line of scrimmage with his indecisive stutter-stepping and then got swallowed up at the line.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10793
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Herbert did much more with his carries than Montgomery did. I hope his load is increased against Green Bay. Montgomery just doesn't seem to see openings as well as Herbert does.


Quickness is imperative in a zone blocking scheme. Herbert is much quicker then Montgomery.

I liked how Getsy pounded them with Montgomery, and finished it off with Herbert.


I don't think Getsy "pounded" the defense with Montgomery since he's not really a power runner. Rather, I just think Montgomery wasted time behind the line of scrimmage with his indecisive stutter-stepping and then got swallowed up at the line.

Herbert is the better RB....credit to Nas....he was the first to call it.

I'd much rather see Herbert get the ball earlier in the game and see if Montgomery can be the "oh shit" guy after the defense is worn down.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13253
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
BigW72 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Hard to judge Fields until he gets a competent Oline and a #1 WR, but there will be plenty of resources to take a run at QB next year.

49ers do have a talented front 7 which made it difficult for them to block anything early, and for Fields to run bootlegs or misdirection, expect the Pack to stack and fill run lanes as will most teams because there is really not anyone that scares you on the Bears offense.


Herbert did much more with his carries than Montgomery did. I hope his load is increased against Green Bay. Montgomery just doesn't seem to see openings as well as Herbert does.


Quickness is imperative in a zone blocking scheme. Herbert is much quicker then Montgomery.

I liked how Getsy pounded them with Montgomery, and finished it off with Herbert.


I don't think Getsy "pounded" the defense with Montgomery since he's not really a power runner. Rather, I just think Montgomery wasted time behind the line of scrimmage with his indecisive stutter-stepping and then got swallowed up at the line.

Herbert is the better RB....credit to Nas....he was the first to call it.

I'd much rather see Herbert get the ball earlier in the game and see if Montgomery can be the "oh shit" guy after the defense is worn down.
Neither rb is much better than average and Nas’s record will remain consistent.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 17, 2022 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Who knew the Bears and Packers would have equally atrocious skill player problems. The Packers best pass catching options are actually running backs by trade. I sure hope every Packer fan enjoys the wasted opportunity that is named Jordan Love - one of dumbest front office blunders of the decade.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4899 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 164  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17, RFDC, The Doctor Of Style, USA and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group