Beardown wrote:
Fuck. You guys just don't get it. One guy is old. One guy is young. They are equal. (I actually think Mitch is slightly better, whatever) PLAY THE YOUNGER GUY. Fuck. It's common sense to me.
I think to distill your point to its essence is that you feel there is still a chance for an upside with Mitch, though you agree that what he has shown currently is not enough for a team with championship ambitions. You also feel that Foles has had ample opportunities over the years to show what he can do with a number of different teams and he still always comes up short. Since they have had similar outcomes, you favor going with the less experienced fellow because the smaller sample set may not be truly indicitive of what he is capable of.
I think the majority of people agree that neither player is exceptionally good at playing QB. I think another reasonable argument would be that we have seen (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky fail to succeed with these players again and again for many games now, while we have only seen Foles fail with these players once. For the majority of us (and I believe even you agree to some extent) we have seen enough to know that (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is not going to be the answer. I believe people want a change because repeating the same thing and failing over and over seems very silly. What we all know deep down though is that the success of this offense is beyond just the QB, and changing a QB isn't likely to save the season anymore than expecting a miraculous (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky growth spurt in playing ability. But a change is a change, and at least it is different. And maybe that will get us to a point where we can actually see real changes in a couple of months.
I think maybe it would be a good time to reflect on sunk costs. Yes, we all had great hopes for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky when he was drafted (whether we thought the pick was good or not, we all hoped he would be great.) But that hasn't turned out to be the case. And his ability to play QB right now has no tie to his draft position. Mahomes plays as well as Mahomes plays regardless of where he was drafted, RG III plays like RG III, Luck plays like Luck, Montana like Montana, Elway like Elway. The draft position is an educated guess of how good a person might turn out to be. We are 43 games into the career now. The spot in the draft is irrelevant at this point. One needs to look at their personal feelings and look at the facts, and separate the two in order to have good judgment moving forward.
The fact of the matter is that neither (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Foles is going to be the QB that a team wants to have running things for their franchise. But these are the two you have to pick from (unless you want to get crazy and try to poach some other team's practice squad players -- if that is even allowed in Covid times.) You sort of have to ride out the season here, and it is a little concerning frankly that you feel this QB decision is going to make a meaningful impact on the Bears future enough to belabor this point in the face of pretty much everyone disagreeing with your assesment.