It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Eaglo wrote:
You high fivin motherfucker

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19366
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65745
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q

This interview was the first time I was glued to the radio in years.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
conns7901 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.


He says they had to trade up. Until 24 hours before the draft, the Browns debated taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Garrett. The Bears were comfortable with Mahomes if that happened. Once the Browns selected Garrett, they heard through other sources (Not the 49ers) that someone was planning to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, so they made the deal to go up to #2.

I'm disappointed they didn't ask what team was trying to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:53 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q

This interview was the first time I was glued to the radio in years.


Yeah, it was great. I hope he does more of these. I have to find time to look into the S2 stuff he was talking about.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92033
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.


He says they had to trade up. Until 24 hours before the draft, the Browns debated taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Garrett. The Bears were comfortable with Mahomes if that happened. Once the Browns selected Garrett, they heard through other sources (Not the 49ers) that someone was planning to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, so they made the deal to go up to #2.

I'm disappointed they didn't ask what team was trying to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't a can't miss prospect. Take the consolation prize who probably was Watson but obviously that would have been a different issue.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65745
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q

This interview was the first time I was glued to the radio in years.


Yeah, it was great. I hope he does more of these. I have to find time to look into the S2 stuff he was talking about.

Yes dude! Yea! I was wondering about that too. And they didn't refuse a dinner with dude... they had met with a bunch of Clemson guys and for whatever reason he "wasn't available".

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.


He says they had to trade up. Until 24 hours before the draft, the Browns debated taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Garrett. The Bears were comfortable with Mahomes if that happened. Once the Browns selected Garrett, they heard through other sources (Not the 49ers) that someone was planning to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, so they made the deal to go up to #2.

I'm disappointed they didn't ask what team was trying to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't a can't miss prospect. Take the consolation prize who probably was Watson but obviously that would have been a different issue.


They had a 2nd round grade on Watson. I actually understand that one. It's one of the reasons I would argue with FF about him not being as good as his stats said he was. It was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Mahomes.

In 2021, they had Wilson and Lance behind the other 3 quarterbacks. It came down to Fields and Mac.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:00 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65745
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.


He says they had to trade up. Until 24 hours before the draft, the Browns debated taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Garrett. The Bears were comfortable with Mahomes if that happened. Once the Browns selected Garrett, they heard through other sources (Not the 49ers) that someone was planning to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, so they made the deal to go up to #2.

I'm disappointed they didn't ask what team was trying to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't a can't miss prospect. Take the consolation prize who probably was Watson but obviously that would have been a different issue.


They had a 2nd round grade on Watson. I actually understand that one. It's one of the reasons I would argue with FF about him not being as good as his stats said he was. It was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Mahomes.

In 2021, they had Wilson and Lance behind the other 3 quarterbacks. It came down to Fields and Mac.

That draft class is a bit... pfffff.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 8:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Nas wrote:
Brick wrote:
Nas wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great interview. He talks about the thinking that went into drafting (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky and Fields. It sounds like the entire league had (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky over Mahomes, and didn't trust Watson.

https://youtu.be/O1e6sHWYh3U?si=z4TGAj9HkHe8bN8q


At the time, many people thought Mahomes was a typical Texas Tech system QB. I preferred Watson due to the fact Mitch couldn't beat out a guy that couldn't make an NFL roster. The real problem with the Mitch selection at the time was trading up when they didn't need to.


He says they had to trade up. Until 24 hours before the draft, the Browns debated taking (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Garrett. The Bears were comfortable with Mahomes if that happened. Once the Browns selected Garrett, they heard through other sources (Not the 49ers) that someone was planning to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky, so they made the deal to go up to #2.

I'm disappointed they didn't ask what team was trying to trade up for (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky.

(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky wasn't a can't miss prospect. Take the consolation prize who probably was Watson but obviously that would have been a different issue.


They had a 2nd round grade on Watson. I actually understand that one. It's one of the reasons I would argue with FF about him not being as good as his stats said he was. It was (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or Mahomes.

In 2021, they had Wilson and Lance behind the other 3 quarterbacks. It came down to Fields and Mac.

That draft class is a bit... pfffff.


They wanted the Minnesota tackle if Mac and Fields were off the board. That's clearly the way they should have gone.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 10:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2014 8:50 pm
Posts: 6282
pizza_Place: PizzaHut
Just watched this on YouTube. Very interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
Excellent interview.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 11:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Absolutely. This Lucas just disclosed so much interesting insight into the Bears under Ryan Pace. Very cool stuff.

This might be the best interview the SCORE has ever done.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 6:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4068
pizza_Place: Lino's
You can see why teams fail so frequently in the draft, some GM's will always give guys with certain athletic traits high grades and will overdraft guys with limited college experience or production because they arrogantly think that they have coaching geniuses that will be able to coach those guys up.

When it comes to QB there seems to be one painfully obvious fact, guys that cannot read NFL level defenses or refuse to take the easy completions will never get any better, they seem to lack the cognitive ability to understand how to attack an NFL level defense.

It is almost impossible to coach up certain QB's, they are who they are and the rest of the NFL often figures that out before your team does. If you have incompetent boobs at the higher levels of your organization, you will never success because you need someone that can clinically make decisions and move on from mistakes quickly rather than allow a GM/HC to start flailing away trying to save his job. You will be able to find out quickly if your GM is overmatched based on the moves he makes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
Is it cognitive ability or is it instinct? Cognitive ability implies the ability to be taught to improve over time. I suspect that this works at the NCAA power 5 level, but not at the NFL level. At the NFL level, you don't have time to think, you just know.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
"Fields is a different guy right now than the tape back in 2021 against the Steelers"

17/29, 291 yd passing, 1 TD, 1 INT, 8 carries for 45 yards. Kmet is the leading receiver, than Robinson, Goodwin, Mooney.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:42 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65745
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
"Fields is a different guy right now than the tape back in 2021 against the Steelers"

17/29, 291 yd passing, 1 TD, 1 INT, 8 carries for 45 yards. Kmet is the leading receiver, than Robinson, Goodwin, Mooney.

Much better, but not great.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:44 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
"Fields is a different guy right now than the tape back in 2021 against the Steelers"

17/29, 291 yd passing, 1 TD, 1 INT, 8 carries for 45 yards. Kmet is the leading receiver, than Robinson, Goodwin, Mooney.


That guy who played in the 2nd half of that game is the player I hoped would continue to develop. He never returned.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Darkside wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
"Fields is a different guy right now than the tape back in 2021 against the Steelers"

17/29, 291 yd passing, 1 TD, 1 INT, 8 carries for 45 yards. Kmet is the leading receiver, than Robinson, Goodwin, Mooney.

Much better, but not great.


That's fair. Lucas picked it and I guess its the height of Fields career at this point.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23999
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Great content. Parkins was very good in that interview.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 9:51 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Great content. Parkins was very good in that interview.


Yeah, Spiegs should have sat that one out. Parkins had that look in his eyes. #Fire&Passion

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 9:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:01 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.


Parkins was definitely in fan mode. We got answers about the process that we would have normally had to wait decades to get. It's one of the most compelling interviews I've heard in a while. It was depressing too.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23999
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

I thought he was the right amount of forceful and direct. He asked obvious, tough questions without giving Lucas a pat on the head in the process or explaining Lucas’ answers afterwards. And while I don’t think Lucas avoided any questions - I thought he was great too - Parkins followed up when necessary

Him pressing Lucas on why trade up for Mitch if you would’ve been fine drafting Mahomes was great.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

I thought he was the right amount of forceful and direct. He asked obvious, tough questions without giving Lucas a pat on the head in the process or explaining Lucas’ answers afterwards. And while I don’t think Lucas avoided any questions - I thought he was great too - Parkins followed up when necessary

Him pressing Lucas on why trade up for Mitch if you would’ve been fine drafting Mahomes was great.


I still want to know who was going to trade up.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 23999
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

I thought he was the right amount of forceful and direct. He asked obvious, tough questions without giving Lucas a pat on the head in the process or explaining Lucas’ answers afterwards. And while I don’t think Lucas avoided any questions - I thought he was great too - Parkins followed up when necessary

Him pressing Lucas on why trade up for Mitch if you would’ve been fine drafting Mahomes was great.


I still want to know who was going to trade up.

Rumor I heard was the Chiefs college scouting guy was pushing hard to get Mitch, but KC didn’t have the resources to jump up that high.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

I thought he was the right amount of forceful and direct. He asked obvious, tough questions without giving Lucas a pat on the head in the process or explaining Lucas’ answers afterwards. And while I don’t think Lucas avoided any questions - I thought he was great too - Parkins followed up when necessary

Him pressing Lucas on why trade up for Mitch if you would’ve been fine drafting Mahomes was great.


I still want to know who was going to trade up.

Rumor I heard was the Chiefs college scouting guy was pushing hard to get Mitch, but KC didn’t have the resources to jump up that high.


This hurts more. :cry: :cry: :cry:

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57225
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
I don't know, Parkins sounds like a complete asshole and if I was Lucas, I wouldn't have given him anything because of it. The approach of, "this is really bothering me, why did you fuck this up" is really unprofessional. Even though his heart and questions are in the right place, it just comes off bad.

I thought he was the right amount of forceful and direct. He asked obvious, tough questions without giving Lucas a pat on the head in the process or explaining Lucas’ answers afterwards. And while I don’t think Lucas avoided any questions - I thought he was great too - Parkins followed up when necessary

Him pressing Lucas on why trade up for Mitch if you would’ve been fine drafting Mahomes was great.

Yeah I agree with this. Parkins had a good mix in this interview. I would love to see more of stuff like this.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Josh Lucas
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 10:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2023 4:02 pm
Posts: 2027
pizza_Place: JJ Twigs
another thing that was just jaw dropping for me was when Lucas said Scott Hagel told him on the day he was hired to not listen to the local media. They're telling new hires that on day one. Do they actually think the local media is out to get them? They're a horrible organization, it's not a vendetta. No wonder they don't seem to understand what they're doing wrong year after year after year. They live in a the football version of North Korea.

_________________
Rod wrote:
There are a lot of hateful people out there



Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
it's time you all are hauled out to the public square and shot in the face, a few inches to the good more than Trump was. You wanted this, now you've got it.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 91 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group