It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 3:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Detroit let him go today. Anybody want him here?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:33 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
By crackey...

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
No, but then again I'm not a radio GM looking for Waddle's (hopefully soon) replacement.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
BB AL.

I feel they have more pressing needs in the draft. I think they should sign a WR in FA and then a later round draft but I don't want TJ or Toomer and I think bryant will cost too much. That's why I'm asking. Is he an upgrade to the crap the Bears have now?

Eat it Reason!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
Is he an upgrade to the crap the Bears have now?


Not really.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Regular Reader wrote:
No, but then again I'm not a radio GM looking for Waddle's (hopefully soon) replacement.


Nearly 100 catches and 1,100 yards...in one year not one career. Granted it was in a Mike Martz offense, but he is not Waddle. He would instantly become the second best WR on this team. That's not saying much but an upgrade is an upgrade...and then add Boldin.

Boldin, Hester and Furrey in the slot would put them in a nice spot at WR.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I would take Furrey over all the crap that we had last year.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
No, but then again I'm not a radio GM looking for Waddle's (hopefully soon) replacement.


Nearly 100 catches and 1,100 yards...in one year not one career. Granted it was in a Mike Martz offense, but he is not Waddle. He would instantly become the second best WR on this team. That's not saying much but an upgrade is an upgrade...and then add Boldin.

Boldin, Hester and Furrey in the slot would put them in a nice spot at WR.


Waddle was better. Furrey was just what was left over after teams stopped covering Calvin Johnson and Roy Williams. The Bears have enough #3 receivers. Stockpiling more of them doesn't help anyone.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Irish Boy wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
No, but then again I'm not a radio GM looking for Waddle's (hopefully soon) replacement.


Nearly 100 catches and 1,100 yards...in one year not one career. Granted it was in a Mike Martz offense, but he is not Waddle. He would instantly become the second best WR on this team. That's not saying much but an upgrade is an upgrade...and then add Boldin.

Boldin, Hester and Furrey in the slot would put them in a nice spot at WR.


Waddle was better. Furrey was just what was left over after teams stopped covering Calvin Johnson and Roy Williams. The Bears have enough #3 receivers. Stockpiling more of them doesn't help anyone.


Shaun Mc Donald also caught a few passes.

Irish, I'm not thinking about tweaking the WR corps. I am thinking about totally revamping it. If you tell me they will get Boldin and draft Hakeem Nicks, I am on board. I think they will do one or the other, which means there is a need for another #3.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
What about Mike Haas?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Tall Midget wrote:
What about Mike Haas?


:lol:

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
I would take Furrey over all the crap that we had last year.


Exactly.

He would be a clear upgrade.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
He'll be 32 in May. This can't possibly be the best we can do... could it?!?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Mike Furrey is a better WR than Hester.

He's probably not a #1 WR either but he's closer than Hester.

Maclin, Furrey, and Hester is a major upgrade in our talent.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Furrey is not a better WR than Hester. It's a little like comparing apples and oranges because the skill sets are so different, but a Mike Furrey can be found anywhere. Hester has a much more potentially valuable skill set.

GD, I'd take Boldin, Nicks, and Furrey. I'd rather take Boldin, Nicks, and Hester. If Furrey is your #4 option, OK, but I wouldn't get too excited about the posibilities, and the upgrade isn't all that big.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
Irish Boy wrote:

GD, I'd take Boldin, Nicks, and Furrey. I'd rather take Boldin, Nicks, and Hester. If Furrey is your #4 option, OK, but I wouldn't get too excited about the posibilities, and the upgrade isn't all that big.


It is HIGHLY unlikely that they both trade for Boldin and draft a WR (especially because Boldin will cost you both a 1 and probably 3). Therefore you have Boldin and Hester or Nicks and Hester but not Boldin, Nicks and Hester. This leaves a hole at #3 unless you feel strongly about the chances of either Davis or Bennett.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92044
Location: To the left of my post
Irish Boy wrote:
Furrey is not a better WR than Hester. It's a little like comparing apples and oranges because the skill sets are so different, but a Mike Furrey can be found anywhere. Hester has a much more potentially valuable skill set.

Devin Hester's skill set is that he is fast.

He's not a good wide receiver yet.

His ceiling is much higher than Furrey's but I feel that Furrey is currently a more reliable WR right now.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 49
Location: Sebastopol Ca
I remember watching him with the Lions thinking man this guy can play. Good hands, good speed and good routes.
When I read that he was cut loose, I thought he could help us. The Bears should take a good look


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
good dolphin wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:

GD, I'd take Boldin, Nicks, and Furrey. I'd rather take Boldin, Nicks, and Hester. If Furrey is your #4 option, OK, but I wouldn't get too excited about the posibilities, and the upgrade isn't all that big.


It is HIGHLY unlikely that they both trade for Boldin and draft a WR (especially because Boldin will cost you both a 1 and probably 3). Therefore you have Boldin and Hester or Nicks and Hester but not Boldin, Nicks and Hester. This leaves a hole at #3 unless you feel strongly about the chances of either Davis or Bennett.


I read your previous post too quickly. Gotcha.

Quote:
Devin Hester's skill set is that he is fast.

He's not a good wide receiver yet.

His ceiling is much higher than Furrey's but I feel that Furrey is currently a more reliable WR right now.


He was running decent routes by the end of the year. He was reliable enough hands that he doesn't drop easy passes. He also has breakaway speed. Even in Furrey's big season, the knock on him was his hands. Despite being white, he's not a tremendous route runner. He is, at best, a slower, whiter, older Devin Hester.

If Furrey is cheap, then fine. I mean, it's not like I'm worried about getting Rashied Davis onto the field. But #3 WR is should be a very small concern considering that the Bears have what could be an elite pass-catching tight end. But I do not want Mike Furrey taking Devin Hester's playing time.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
I dont know what the $$$ are, but if he is 32, I bet his minimum is no less than $800K, maybe even more.

Would rather find the next Furrey for $300K

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:22 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:03 pm
Posts: 4944
Great! Sign him and bring in Brett Favre, Field Turf, and Heath Ledger and I think we might have a chance at the Super Bowl.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
Great! Sign him and bring in Brett Favre, Field Turf, and Heath Ledger and I think we might have a chance at the Super Bowl.


:lol: "A Towering Line Drive"

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mike Furrey
PostPosted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 13406
Location: The Crownville Lab
pizza_Place: Langel's
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
Great! Sign him and bring in Brett Favre, Field Turf, and Heath Ledger and I think we might have a chance at the Super Bowl.

Caleb Haney! :wink: Will Furrer! Curtis Enis!! Chad Hutchinson!!! :shaking2: Uhh! I need another drink. :drunken:

_________________
-"God is great. Beer is good. And People are crazy!"
bigfan wrote:
I am in the urination, puking, drunk, yelling zone.

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
I once jerked in a chicken truck, so I have that going for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HawaiiYou, Jaw Breaker, Nardi, NME, The Doctor Of Style and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group