It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 2:31 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Mr. Reason
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
If I had to chose between Wale and Briggs, I say Briggs.
How much of a cap hit would Wale's release result in? That is all that matters to the front office. The NFL has made cap management almost as important as talent evaluation. If you want to be competitive for an extended period of time, you have to manage both equally well. I hope they can find a way to retain Briggs. But if they can't, I have faith in Angelo to find a replacement. He can find defensive talent, offense not so much yet.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 9:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92099
Location: To the left of my post
How much do they have to pay to franchise him?
Top
 Profile  
 
BD
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:25 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12452
With the salary cap increase from the new CBA, and now Tommie Harris' potential career threatening injury (that COULD cut down on his speed at the very least), why wouldn't the Bears either

A) reconsider their cap strategy, and make it a priority to lock up Briggs

B) Franchise Briggs and then reevaluate after Harris comes back ???
Top
 Profile  
 
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I think option B is the one they should and will take.

_________________
You know me like that.
Top
 Profile  
 
tshanno
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:15 am
Posts: 62
Mr. Reason wrote:
If I had to chose between Wale and Briggs, I say Briggs.


Generally speaking, good defensive ends are harder to find. At least for the Bears.

Tom S.

_________________
http://blog.chicagobearsfanforum.com
Top
 Profile  
 
johnbucktown
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 9:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:43 pm
Posts: 189
Location: chicago
pizza_Place: Pete's
i think they should waive wale or moose and sign briggs to a extension. didn't we learn with colvin?
Top
 Profile  
 
Sleuth
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 10:03 pm
Posts: 1536
No way they should cut Moose.
Top
 Profile  
 
Bulldog Scott
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Crumbs Krause wrote:
No way they should cut Moose.

At least, not yet. I think he signed a 6 year deal. No way they keep him for all 6 years. I'd say 4 tops.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."
Top
 Profile  
 
Ungotz
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:16 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:41 pm
Posts: 270
I get the feeling that Briggs wants out of Chicago. He probably is tired of being in Urlachers shadow. He is a good solid linebacker who will be over paid by some desperate team. He is good......and a solid player but he has missed some huge tackles this year......and I wonder if he benefits a lot from playing with #54.......... because I'm sure #54 has benefitted from playing with Briggs
Top
 Profile  
 
doug - evergreen park
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:28 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Quote:
An average of the top 5 salaries at his position. They can only franchise him once though.


how is that Nas? Dwight Freeney was franchised by the Colts like 3 years in a row....

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.
Top
 Profile  
 
doug - evergreen park
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:41 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
i'll ask it again and try to be a little clearer....
how can they franchise him only once.....
:)

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.
Top
 Profile  
 
Ungotz
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:42 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 1:41 pm
Posts: 270
I agree but I think that has more to do with the depth of the Bears D-Line....they have a lot of good D-Lineman........... LB....... they are not very deep at all....... this also raises Briggs' value.
Top
 Profile  
 
doug - evergreen park
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:53 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
it doesn't say anything about franchising him only once....
only one player per year...

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.
Top
 Profile  
 
MattInTheCrown
 Post subject: Re: Briggs.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Quote:
Should the Bears release or restructure Ogunleye's contract so they could resign Briggs? I've heard a few people ask this question on the radio today so I wanted to get you guys opinion on it. I think they should do it. Ogunleye has been a big disappointment and he won't play hurt. I would mind them giving Anderson a shot if he doesn't want to rework his deal.

I agree. Ogunleye is good, but if it came down to one or the other, I'd much rather lose Ogunleye than Briggs. Briggs is not only one of the Bears best players, but he's at a position with less depth; after seeing Anderson play, I know the Bears are deep at DE.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group