It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:17 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Taylor was another waste of money, along with the 400 pound TE.

Moon also claims that the Bears have interest in Plaxeco, Roy Williams, & Braylon Edwards, & also that there is a chance that the entire OL is replaced with 5 different guys next season. Interesting article.

http://www.csnchicago.com/01/31/11/First-Look-2011-Chicago-Bears-offense/landing_insider_john_moon_mullin.html?blockID=401368&feedID=626

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Cutting Taylor makes no sense. Why would you want to eat that money?

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Cutting Taylor makes no sense. Why would you want to eat that money?


Why in the world did the Bears sign Taylor to a 4 year contract? He is a career backup...a journeyman player.
Taylor has already been paid $7 million of the four-year, $12.5 million contract he signed. He is due to make $1.275 million in 2011.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Frank Coztansa wrote:
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.

Disagree. Forte was hurt last year.



5 new lineman?

Thats ridiculous


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
There are about 7 positions that should be addressed before back-up RB is even discussed. Taylor is an ok back-up. Even if he sucks, there are enough other problems that should keep them busy. I hope they aren't really considering this...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Frank Coztansa wrote:
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.

He averaged 2.4 yds per carry and 7 yds per reception. It shouldn't be very difficult to find someone cheaper who can put up better numbers than that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Krazy Ivan wrote:
There are about 7 positions that should be addressed before back-up RB is even discussed. Taylor is an ok back-up. Even if he sucks, there are enough other problems that should keep them busy. I hope they aren't really considering this...

Maybe they wanna allocate the money elsewhere


I think they got him as a Forte insurance, unsure of whether Forte would comeback like he did.

If they can save a couple million and add that to a deal for another need, id be ok with it.

Though Id prefer to keep him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.


Forte had approximately the same number of carries (237 vs. 258) and receptions (51 vs. 57) in 2010 as he did in 2009.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Garrett Wolfe should be starting. Cut Taylor and Forte.

Go Huskies!

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
Weren't some of the idiots on here saying Taylor would take the starting spot from Forte?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Keyser Soze wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.

He averaged 2.4 yds per carry and 7 yds per reception. It shouldn't be very difficult to find someone cheaper who can put up better numbers than that.



But you already paid him 7 mil. Why go pay money for someone else when you only owe him 1 mil for this season? You'd have to pay more for somebody better. Why not spend that money on a LT, C, RG, WR1, WR2, DT, DE, CB, SLB, etc...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
He's due $1.275M. He's old and bad. They can get a younger player for less or equal money who can also contribute on special teams. They have to upgrade the roster and this is clearly a position that needs to be upgraded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
I think I heard he had the lowest YPC for all RBs over 100 carries. You sunk the cost, no reason to keep him around.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Keyser Soze wrote:
He's due $1.275M. He's old and bad. They can get a younger player for less or equal money who can also contribute on special teams. They have to upgrade the roster and this is clearly a position that needs to be upgraded.



You aren't going to upgrade paying a guy 1.275M. You'd more than likely get the same or worse. Why bother? You don't think Taylor and Forte would be better with a good line in front of them?

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Frank Coztansa wrote:
A big reason why Forte was so fresh and still very good at the end of the year is because Taylor got carries every game.


Taylor sucked. I just heard that Garret Wolfes YPC was higher than Taylors. Thats bad...real bad.

Backup RB should never be a priority in the NFL. RB is the easiest position to fill in the NFL. RB's are a dime a dozen. The Bears had at least 5 other positions that should have been addressed before backup RB.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Last edited by Scorehead on Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Scorehead wrote:
I just heard that Garret Wolfes YPC was higher than Taylors.

Garrett Wolfe had 4 carries this season. Your source is an idiot, and dumb.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
The Bears drafted Unga in the supplemental draft and IRd him. I don't know what he will be like as a pro but he was a good college player. He can certainly fill the short yardage role.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Douchebag wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
I just heard that Garret Wolfes YPC was higher than Taylors.

Garrett Wolfe had 4 carries this season. Your source is an idiot, and dumb.


I believe the comparison was Wolfes career YPC as a Bear compared to Taylors career YPC as a Bear. Either way, they are both bad. There are 100 other guys who can do what Taylor did for the Bears this year.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Last edited by Scorehead on Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Scorehead wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
I just heard that Garret Wolfes YPC was higher than Taylors.

Garrett Wolfe had 4 carries this season. Your source is an idiot, and dumb.


I believe the comparison was Wolfes career YPC as a Bear compared to Taylors career YPC as a Bears. Either way, they are both bad. There are 100 other guys who can do what Taylor did for the Bears this year.

You can't look at a guy that had 4 carries all of last year to compare him against another back. That isn't a big enough sample size to make any kind of judgement on. Jay Cutler averaged 4.6 YPC last season, should he be the backup RB for this team?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
He's due $1.275M. He's old and bad. They can get a younger player for less or equal money who can also contribute on special teams. They have to upgrade the roster and this is clearly a position that needs to be upgraded.



You aren't going to upgrade paying a guy 1.275M. You'd more than likely get the same or worse. Why bother? You don't think Taylor and Forte would be better with a good line in front of them?

Why bother? Seriously? They need to upgrade the roster and replacing Chester Taylor will be an easy upgrade. A late round draft pick or even an undrafted free agent can get 2.4 yds per carry and 7 yds per reception. They also get the benefit of using him on special teams which opens up another roster spot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
And when Forte goes down and the 7th round rookie they drafted to replace Taylor has to make a couple of starts everyone will scream at Angelo for letting go of Taylor. They already paid the money, he isnt making that much and he is a decent back up. No reason to worry about this position. Get a WR or LT.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Wow, that's a stupid post. So Angelo shouldn't upgrade the roster based on a hypothetical injury and stupid fans reactions to the hypothetical injury? Replacing Taylor with a better, cheaper more versatile player will not prevent them from getting a WR or LT.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
The real story in that article is that the coaching staff may move Webb to left tackle.

Guess the coaches really do hate Cutler.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Here is my list of players who should be cut by the Bears:

Todd Collins
Tommie Harris
Chester Taylor
Brandon Manamaneueueeuenaueello
Rasheed Davis
Desmond Clark
Frank Omiyale

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Keyser Soze wrote:
Wow, that's a stupid post. So Angelo shouldn't upgrade the roster based on a hypothetical injury and stupid fans reactions to the hypothetical injury? Replacing Taylor with a better, cheaper more versatile player will not prevent them from getting a WR or LT.


Where is your hypothetical better and cheaper player?? This team has so much to worry about and you are worrying about the back up RB, that is football stupid. Lets focus on the back up long snapper while we are at it.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Packers just won the Super Bowl with a rookie backup 6th round pick starting at RB. Good thing for them their GM isn't short-sighted about upgrading the roster whenever possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
:lol: :lol: Yeah the reason they won the SB and won their previous playoff games was clearly the inspired play of Starks. It had nothing to do with a top 5 defense and top 3 QB.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Tall Midget wrote:
The real story in that article is that the coaching staff may move Webb to left tackle.

Guess the coaches really do hate Cutler.


Webb probably has the most talent on the O-line and Williams appears to be more comfortable on the right side.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Keyser Soze wrote:
The Packers just won the Super Bowl with a rookie backup 6th round pick starting at RB. Good thing for them their GM isn't short-sighted about upgrading the roster whenever possible.


Starks had 2-3 round talent but his senior season was a wash and scouts are not as forgiving of MAC talent losing time on the field. Still, his 13 carries in the super bowl were not a reason for success.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group