It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:34 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/pr ... 11316.html

Notables:

Cubs:

Chris Archer (Rays) #27
Brett Jackson at #38
Trey McNutt #48


wSox:
Chris Sale #20
Brent Morel #85

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Josh Vitters yearly rankings:

2008: #43 Prospect
2009: #51 Prospect
2010: #70 Prospect
2011: Outside top 100

This looks like a make or break year for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Royals have 9 players in the top 100 including 3 in the top 10 and 5 in the top 20. That team could be scary good in a couple/few years.

The Rays have 7 players in the top 100 and own 12 of the first 89 picks in this years draft. TB also had 5 picks in the first 2 rounds last season. This team is going to be a thorn in the sides of the Yanks and Red Sox for a long time. Now they need a new staduim so they can compete financially to really turn into a monster.

The Brewers are the only team with zero players in the top 100. Maybe they should adopt the 'all in' slogan.

Mike Trout should be #1 because he has a year of big time success at the professional level under his belt. Harper had only limited play in the Arizona fall league.

I disagree with Montero #3. He's going to be a big time hitter but he's a terrible catcher and wil be moved to 1B/DH which hurts his long term value.

Joe Benson should be higher than #100.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Keyser Soze wrote:
Josh Vitters yearly rankings:

2008: #43 Prospect
2009: #51 Prospect
2010: #70 Prospect
2011: Outside top 100

This looks like a make or break year for him.


Josh Vitters......I totally forgot about that guy. Just checked his stats, not that great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
He really isn't developing like they hoped either offensively or defensively. His poor plate disipline (49 walks in 1178 PA's) is really hurting him. He's had some injuries but they certainly expected more than just 63 games played at double A after 4 years in the minors from the 3rd overall pick in the draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Fri Feb 25, 2011 11:34 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Braves and Yankees are getting props for each having 6 prospects in the top 100. That is very misleading because half of those prospects (3 for each team) were international signees who the organizations simply threw the most money at. 'Hey you're good here's a giant bag of money come play for us'. Not much skill in that. More proof that MLB needs to institute an international draft.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:07 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Keyser Soze wrote:
The Royals have 9 players in the top 100 including 3 in the top 10 and 5 in the top 20. That team could be scary good in a couple/few years.

Isn't this the story almost every year with KC?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
Wow, the Brewers have 0 in the top 100. Wasn't it just a couple years ago they were being praised for their good farm system? Guess that trade for CC really worked out well.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BA's Top 100
PostPosted: Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
The Royals have 9 players in the top 100 including 3 in the top 10 and 5 in the top 20. That team could be scary good in a couple/few years.

Isn't this the story almost every year with KC?

Absolutely not. Baseball America said Kansas City has the best minor league system they have ever seen and that was before the Zack Greinke trade. The amount of talent thay have is almost disgusting. How they use that talent to improve the major league team is another story but if they don't completely fuck it up they could be the Tampa Bay Rays in a couple years.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group