It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:50 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Serious Question
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:14 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:36 am
Posts: 362
Why is that people like North, Boers, Bernstein, Dahl and Stern make a living saying anything about anyone they want, but if someone even looks at them crosseyed, they go crazy?

Just looking for opinions.

_________________
<<<< I have a picture of EG Greg as my avatar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:55 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 4614
Massive insecurity problems. Typical of bullies. These guys are all pussies and afraid of their own shadows, which in the case of Dahl, is a rather large shadow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 8:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:57 am
Posts: 385
Small penis length?

They can't get 'the final word' on a message board?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:06 pm
Posts: 607
Location: Somewhere in the lower 48
I would think its because they're very careful about not crossing the line between criticizing a persons actions or statements and criticizing the person and potentially damaging their livelihood.

Of course, if that standard held, we'd see a lot more athletes suing talk show hosts, commentators and news people. Barry Bonds springs to mind. He's never been convicted of anything and he's never tested positive for anything but amphetamines, but the media has vilified him and it's open season on Bonds bashing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82238
Missed that grand jury testiony, Sam?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 10:08 pm
Posts: 82
I do think these guys are so used to hammerng people all day and the subject never gets any chance to respond, but this is one of the few places the people get a chance to speak. (or type)

Mike claims he just read this stuff for the first time this week and if that is true, which I doubt, he is the goof he calls everyone else.

Good or bad, how could you not read honest and direct feedback?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:06 pm
Posts: 607
Location: Somewhere in the lower 48
good dolphin wrote:
Missed that grand jury testiony, Sam?


No.. I'm quite aware of it.. and I was certain using Bonds as an example would be problematic for some.. would you have preferred I used Big Mac? We know he used andro which was a legal supplement at the time and the only reason he stopped is that MLB thought it presented the wrong image.

Fast forward a few years and rampant speculation (and his congressional testimony or lack thereof) has painted him as a steroid abuser and overall bad guy.

I guess my point is that you can't sue the court of public opinion if it collectively defames you, but if you can put your finger on an actual human or two that is doing it, you can at least entertain the idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Quote:
Small penis length?


Or a complete lack of penis...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group