It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 8:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Vazquez vs Lilly
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 9:14 pm
Posts: 1158
pizza_Place: Suparosa on Central between Irving and Montrose. Forget about the rest!!!
Never been more wrong. He states that Lilly is a 2 and Vasquez is a 4/5 so the Vaszquez deal is a good one. After the first go round in the rotation being a 2 or a 3 or 4 or a 5 DOESNT MATTER, THEY PITCH EVERY 5TH DAY!!! I would be willing to put down some money that Lilly will have much better numbers at the end of the year than Vazquez. I see Lilly's ERA under 4 while Vasquez will be up near 5.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:49 pm
Posts: 685
What do u expect, the Sox do now wrong and now they are willing to let a guy like Buerhle walk. Buerhle had one bad year and the So are going to hold it against him. Also didnt KW say he would let Iguchi and Dye walk? So much for payng up if the fans came out.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82238
This year's stats will not be comparable as the leagues are very different. I would expect Lilly's numbers to be better across the board in the NL.

How did they compare last year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:49 pm
Posts: 685
I actually like Vazquez, but it seems he has lost something on his stuff..Hmmmmmmmm

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: West Quahog, R.I.
pizza_Place: Duneland Pizza
KW said that Buerhle, Dye and Iguchi would be able to test the free-agent waters -- he didn't say that he was going to just let them walk without an offer. There's a difference.
Velocity isn't Vasquez' issue -- it's location. He hangs too many sliders.
Lilly is a 2 -- are you kiddin' me. His numbers are more like those of a 4 or 5.
He's one game over .500 for his career with a career ERA of 4.60.
Vasquez is 100-105 with a 4.34 ERA. Vasquez's WHIP is 1.29, Lilly 1.43.
I don't think it's a lock that Lilly will have better numbers this year.

_________________
President of Blake Shetlon fan club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:27 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:36 am
Posts: 362
La elección mala firmar a este tipo, él acaba de ir a consigue peor y con Tinte y Buerhle que andan una vez el año está sobre, bien, su ir a consigue feo.

or


Dårlig valg undertegne denne guy, han akkurat dra bli verre og med Fargestoff og Buerhle gå en gang året er over, godt, dets å draing bli stygg.

_________________
<<<< I have a picture of EG Greg as my avatar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:50 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12450
bigguscattus wrote:
KW said that Buerhle, Dye and Iguchi would be able to test the free-agent waters -- he didn't say that he was going to just let them walk without an offer. There's a difference.
Velocity isn't Vasquez' issue -- it's location. He hangs too many sliders.
Lilly is a 2 -- are you kiddin' me. His numbers are more like those of a 4 or 5.
He's one game over .500 for his career with a career ERA of 4.60.
Vasquez is 100-105 with a 4.34 ERA. Vasquez's WHIP is 1.29, Lilly 1.43.
I don't think it's a lock that Lilly will have better numbers this year.


Ideally, Lilly should be no more than a #3. A #4 would be great. On the Cubs, he's a #2, thus one problem with the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: West Quahog, R.I.
pizza_Place: Duneland Pizza
That's correct.
Just don't try telling that to Murph.

_________________
President of Blake Shetlon fan club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 3021
If I were a Sxo fan, I wouldnt be comparing Vazquez to Cub pitchers, I would be looking at the Twins, Indians and Tigers, not a team in a DIFFERENT LEAGUE.

But thats just me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:02 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
North is dumb if that was his reaction. Alot of people get caught up with numbering the starting rotation.

They are all going to pitch 30-33 games. What the hell does it matter where they are numbered in the rotation?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:09 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:17 am
Posts: 3073
Location: Chicago-West Side
I think they use this 1-5 slotting to discuss relative value. For instance, if you're going to pay your 4 or 5 $10 mil per year then it's BS that you're paying your 1 and 2 way less. North is still a moron though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 2:38 pm
Posts: 3838
Location: West Quahog, R.I.
pizza_Place: Duneland Pizza
RodeoVann wrote:
If I were a Sxo fan, I wouldnt be comparing Vazquez to Cub pitchers, I would be looking at the Twins, Indians and Tigers, not a team in a DIFFERENT LEAGUE.

But thats just me.


I agree, because Cubs fans never compare things with the White Sox.

_________________
President of Blake Shetlon fan club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2007 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 9:31 pm
Posts: 4051
Location: logan squiz
pizza_Place: art of pizza
compare vasquez and lilly's rate stats and you'll find a good comparison for vasquez against a league average pitcher. those extra K's and fewer runs/9 + hits/9 are what makes vasquez worth the money.

also, i know nobody cares or wants to hear about trend projections, but buehrle, as a guy who's approaching 30, does not trend as favorably as everyone's making out. the guy should see a rather steady drop in the production we all expect (hits allowed, gb/fb ratio, walks allowed) which makes him less and less valuable in a hitter's park on a team with promising young arms.

and on the topic of vasquez bringing the deal to the sox, several theories were posited at an otherwise empty Two-Way Lounge last night. the primaries are:

- the guy feels it's better to stick with a good team than get bounced around, as he has since his tenure w/ montreal.

- there's something wrong with him, and he wants to get paid.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 4:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 49
Location: LITH
It's OK to compare their numbers for now because they both were on AL teams last year. After this year, it doesn't matter.


I agree that if Vazquez can straighten out location, he's a dangerous pitcher

As far as the fifth and done theory, I feel much better with the pen this year versus last year if he struggles

_________________
When I was your age they used to say you could become cops or criminals. What I'm saying to you is this... When you're facing a loaded gun, what's the difference?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group