It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:57 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Once again, the Bears look like a house of cards. If Urlacher,Briggs or Peppers has an injury,it will only get uglier. My question is,what can Lovie do about it. He is handed another roster devoid of talent at DT,O-Line,WR,TE,SS,WS. The Bears have squandered draft choices on two injury prone OL and have done little else. Lovie has made some poor time management decisions,but he has a knack of keeping his team in most games and overall,I think he has done a pretty good job. If the downward spiral continues,I would understand if he got fired,but he isn't first on my list.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
jimmypasta wrote:
Once again, the Bears look like a house of cards. If Urlacher,Briggs or Peppers has an injury,it will only get uglier. My question is,what can Lovie do about it. He is handed another roster devoid of talent at DT,O-Line,WR,TE,SS,WS. The Bears have squandered draft choices on two injury prone OL and have done little else. Lovie has made some poor time management decisions,but he has a knack of keeping his team in most games and overall,I think he has done a pretty good job. If the downward spiral continues,I would understand if he got fired,but he isn't first on my list.


IMO it is his knack of keeping his team in most games that may in fact be the problem. The man makes a edible and sometimes tasty shit sandwich....therefore...why change the ingredients.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65804
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
UMN touched on it... Lovie is a good (albeit flawed, such as his extremely poor clock management skills) head coach. He's got nothing to work with. Last year's team had no business (queue Clint Howard 'NO BUSINESS! NO BUSINESS!') being 11-5.
This year, I don't care who is coaching them, you've got a terrible Offensive line, terrible. That means that no matter how good your QB is you're gonna get him turned into hamburger. And if he's dead, it don't matter how GOOD he was when he was alive... he's still dead. Even if and when he can get the ball out of his hands, Cutler has nobody to throw to.
Couple that with the fact that the best parts of your defense aren't getting any younger... Tillman's best days are absolutely behind him, and Urlacher, while still good, doesn't seem to be able to carry the D any more. Briggs isn't finishing tackles and the safety situation is a fucking joke.
So, you might be the best NASCAR driver out there but if you're not in a good solid car, say you're driving a LeCar, you're not drinking the milk.

Image

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Merrionette Park
pizza_Place: Nick&Vito's
We better take a timeout I we are gonna discuss this. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
He hired Martz.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.
Lovie's in the same spot as Kenny Williams' managers are: no team to work with.

So from that standpoint, I can't judge Lovie too harshly. Except, I've seen his lack of flexibility, inability to tweak gameplans, and his coordinators have been worse along the same lines.

But do I blame him 100%? No. Angelo's complicity has to be in the 60-70% range.

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Beebo,
That's about how I see it. Angelo should be no higher than a scout in any other organization.
I'm waiting for the NEW McCaskey to do something bold. He might be worse than Ricketts in regards to playing the waiting game.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
i can't believe what i am reading, lovie is a terrible in game coach...lovie hired martz and brought in archuletta and pace, he also makes the roster decisions...letting lloyd go was dumb, letting thomas jones go was dumb..keeping tommie harris too long was dumb..jerry angelo is not your typical egomaniac g.m. he is scared to make bold moves alone, he includes lovie and the scouts on draft day decisions....olsen traded to start davis was dumb...this team may not have the talent like detroit or greenbay but smith is part of the blame...all these guys deserve to be fired and until a house cleaning happens this franchise is all downhill

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
1. This defense is all Lovie. Marinelli is just a puppet for him. Chico got run out of town because he wanted to go more aggressive with it and Lovie refused. "Bend don't break" sucks big donkey balls. It's an ancient defense that every decent offense knows how to beat.

2. He brought in the rigid Martz.

3. He has some say with his personel. It's not Angelo calling ALL of the shots

4. Clock/time out management

5. Smug, defiant interviews/press conferences

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Quote:
Chico got run out of town because he wanted to go more aggressive with it and Lovie refused.

Bob Babich blitzed more than any other DC in the NFL during his time in Chicago. Ron Rivera was run out of town because he and Lovie didn't like one another.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Killer V wrote:
1. This defense is all Lovie. Marinelli is just a puppet for him. Chico got run out of town because he wanted to go more aggressive with it and Lovie refused. "Bend don't break" sucks big donkey balls. It's an ancient defense that every decent offense knows how to beat.

2. He brought in the rigid Martz.

3. He has some say with his personel. It's not Angelo calling ALL of the shots

4. Clock/time out management

5. Smug, defiant interviews/press conferences


1. IB already addressed a couple items here. But also the scheme is not the problem. Lovie's defense is fine and if you have the right personnel you can be successful. The problem with the defense is they are getting old and do not have any depth.

2. No doubt a bad hire. But it was not like there were many better options available at the time. Several people they wanted turned them down. In retrospect they probably should have kept Turner.

3. Sure Lovie has some say, but the buck stops with Angelo here. He is the one responsible for making these calls.

4. Lovie does struggle here, but if you have watched much of the NFL over the last few years so does every other coach.

5. :roll:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
RFDC wrote:
1. IB already addressed a couple items here. But also the scheme is not the problem. Lovie's defense is fine and if you have the right personnel you can be successful. The problem with the defense is they are getting old and do not have any depth.

2. No doubt a bad hire. But it was not like there were many better options available at the time. Several people they wanted turned them down. In retrospect they probably should have kept Turner.

3. Sure Lovie has some say, but the buck stops with Angelo here. He is the one responsible for making these calls.

4. Lovie does struggle here, but if you have watched much of the NFL over the last few years so does every other coach.

5. :roll:


1. ANY defense can be "fine" with the right personnel. Sticking with your scheme when you don't have the "right" personnel is just plain stubborn and stupid.

2. Everyone knew what they'd be getting with Martz, and they got it (see #1). There's always another option.

3. Yes, Angelo shoulders most of the blame, but how many more ex-Rams do you need to see starting here before you believe he has a lot of say?

4. I've never seen a coach blow multiple TOs on the same play as much as Lovie, or be as consistently bad at clock management from game to game.

5. Good Lovie impression.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
1. What defensive scheme would fit our personnel better? There is no scheme designed for old.

2. So who was the other option? At that point in time they were pretty much at the bottom of the barrel.

3. If the players were not right for the team then Angelo should be the GM and tell him no they won't work, so obviously Angelo was in agreement with him.

4. I am not sure how you go about proving that. Just about every game I watch on Sunday has a bad time management issue with the coach. Again, no doubt Lovie is bad at this.

5. You have always seemed like a pretty intelligent guy around here, so I am honestly surprised to see you go this meatball route here.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
RFDC wrote:
In retrospect they probably should have kept Turner.


Oy. Agreed that Martz is not working out, but Ron Turner has all the imagination and moxie of Grimace.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
RFDC wrote:
1. What defensive scheme would fit our personnel better? There is no scheme designed for old.


No but his defense relies on elite talent at key positions. It doesn't work on a consistent basis. It's not the sign of a good competitive team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC wrote:
1. What defensive scheme would fit our personnel better? There is no scheme designed for old.


No but his defense relies on elite talent at key positions. It doesn't work on a consistent basis. It's not the sign of a good competitive team.


what scheme relies on non-elite talent?

Please show me a really good defense that does not have a couple elite level players.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
the jets have one elite player and seem to be pretty elite as a unit..that is coaching/scheming..the bears have 2-3 elite players and suck on defense

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:44 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I'm going to use letters damnit!!!!!

a. The Defensive line is the main problem. Especially the tackles which was suppose to be good with depth.

b. The deep passes for TDs against us this year have been cuz our safties were stupid. They bit when they shouldn't have. I'm talking that Saints TD, the Carolina TD to Smith and the Lions TD.

c. Urlacher is slower. You can see it. He's not horrible cuz he still has goood instincts, but he's on the decline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
312player wrote:
the jets have one elite player and seem to be pretty elite as a unit..that is coaching/scheming..the bears have 2-3 elite players and suck on defense


The Jets are an average defense this year. And their record shows it, 2-3.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
There are teams that have had injuries that still succeed, Bears aren't built, not only, to survive that, but it sends them into almost a tailspin. They also seemingly ignore other defensive positions while searching for the perfect DEs or DTs. I think that is a shit philosophy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Spaulding wrote:
There are teams that have had injuries that still succeed, Bears aren't built, not only, to survive that, but it sends them into almost a tailspin. They also seemingly ignore other defensive positions while searching for the perfect DEs or DTs. I think that is a shit philosophy.


Again, this is a personnel/depth problem, not one about the scheme.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
(Spoiler Alert: This is not a defense of Mike Martz)

Many people say a big part of the issue with the Martz offense is that it's no longer groundbreaking. Every team has caught up, and there's better, newer options available. It was fresh, new, and on turf in 2000.

Put this offensive squad, in St. Louis, in the year 2000. They could run every play the same as the Super Bowl Champion Rams, and it would look like the movie Little Giants.

Does Lovie have flaws? Absolutely. I used more curse words with :08 seconds left in the first quarter and no timeouts Monday, than I have after each second round pick is cut one year later. But this falls on Jerry Angelo. Did he take some bad suggestions to add old St. Louis Rams? Yep. They looked like LA Rams. But this falls on the office.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
RFDC wrote:
Again, this is a personnel/depth problem, not one about the scheme.


But when that happens you need to be prepared to or able to adjust. Work with what you do have. They don't do that. They ask of their players what they are not capable of. They've ignored too much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Again, this is a personnel/depth problem, not one about the scheme.


But when that happens you need to be prepared to or able to adjust. Work with what you do have. They don't do that. They ask of their players what they are not capable of. They've ignored too much.


So you really want Lovie to switch defensive schemes in the middle of the year? You want him to switch to a scheme that he has no experience with? That makes no sense.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Again, this is a personnel/depth problem, not one about the scheme.


But when that happens you need to be prepared to or able to adjust. Work with what you do have. They don't do that. They ask of their players what they are not capable of. They've ignored too much.


Granted it was not on the defensive side, but Lovie has forced a scheme change in the middle of the season. It was based on personnel. It happened with the offense last year.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 5:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
RFDC wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Again, this is a personnel/depth problem, not one about the scheme.


But when that happens you need to be prepared to or able to adjust. Work with what you do have. They don't do that. They ask of their players what they are not capable of. They've ignored too much.


So you really want Lovie to switch defensive schemes in the middle of the year? You want him to switch to a scheme that he has no experience with? That makes no sense.


I expect a competent coach to adjust to his talents.....play to his team's strengths. Right now, on both offense and defense, they're using a scheme which isn't working with the current talent level. They're still using it despite not having the personnel. What's the definition of insanity again?

And as for the meatball comment, it's not a reason why he should or should not be head coach, it's the icing on the cake on why I get so frustrated with him. It's not much different from when my 6 year old does something wrong then tries to give me attitude about it. Doing something wrong can be frustrating enough, but the attitude on top it it just makes it exponentially worse.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Killer V wrote:
I expect a competent coach to adjust to his talents.....play to his team's strengths. Right now, on both offense and defense, they're using a scheme which isn't working with the current talent level. They're still using it despite not having the personnel. What's the definition of insanity again?



Again, what scheme would work better with our talent level?

No coach changes defensive schemes in the middle of the season. Every coach makes adjustments during the season in their normal scheme. Lovie and the defensive coaches make adjustments constantly. Most of them go completely unnoticed to the fans.

Do you realize how bad things would be here if they scrapped their defensive scheme and started over in the season? It would be brutal.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
I'm not an NFL head coach or coordinator. I don't know exactly what changes should take place or how they'd be implemented. I do know that what they're running now is not working, yet they keep trotting it out there. Now they're just swapping personnel. It hasn't worked in the past and I don't see it working now.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:50 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
RFDC wrote:
No coach changes defensive schemes in the middle of the season.

If Martz & Lovie can change and tweak offensive schemes midseason like they did last year, why can't the change defense schemes? I'm not saying start over, but outside of the Atlanta game, the defensive scheme this year (whatever that may be) is not working. They are getting torched on the run and giving big plays week after week. Part of that is execution and that is on the players as well as the coaches, but part of it is the scheme too.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: In defense of Lovie
PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Wow, lotta Lovie hate considering if Cutler wasnt a quitter they could have been in the Super Bowl last year.


Lovie is a winning coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Man and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group