It is currently Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:52 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38609
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
heard it on a scoreboard update.

2 #1 picks? Seems kind of high.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
Al Davis must still be alive.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
So, in the past 2 months, the raiders have used two first round picks and a third round pick on QB's?

I wonder if the Oakland fans will overreact to what this means.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
1 number one pick and a conditional draft pick (didnt say which round) in the report I saw.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27501
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
That is an awful trade. The Gunslinger would have been more than happy to suit up for the Raiders.


If in fact it was only 1 #1 pick it is not as bad as I originally thought with 2 #1 picks.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38609
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
rogers park bryan wrote:
1 number one pick and a conditional draft pick (didnt say which round) in the report I saw.

They were calling the conditional draft pick a 1st rounder on The Score

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I just dropped him in a league last week and now he gets traded. My timing is great.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
That is an awful trade. The Gunslinger would have been more than happy to suit up for the Raiders.


If in fact it was only 1 #1 pick it is not as bad as I originally thought with 2 #1 picks.

Actually if its conditional, it probably is a number one

But the condition could be Palmer going throwing for 4000 yds next year or something.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27501
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
That is an awful trade. The Gunslinger would have been more than happy to suit up for the Raiders.


If in fact it was only 1 #1 pick it is not as bad as I originally thought with 2 #1 picks.

Actually if its conditional, it probably is a number one

But the condition could be Palmer going throwing for 4000 yds next year or something.


If he doesn't though...don't they get something slightly lesser instead or does it just drop to the single #1 pick?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
Good for the Bengals. Palmer has some health / elbow questions and he was being a prick besides. If you take a close look at the Bengals team...they seem to be building a good young nucleus with o-line & d-line, and now a young qb who looks like he can play and a good looking rookie receiver too. With some additional early round picks in future years, they might actually have a team again someday.

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Doesn't that mean the Raiders don't have a single draft pick until the 6th round?

The Keyzer Soze Strategy for building a winning football franchise.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
#1 picks are worth so much more in the new agreement. Whoever is running the Raiders now is much crazier than Al.

Also, Carson Palmer sucks, so its really a bad trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38609
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Big Chicagoan wrote:
#1 picks are worth so much more in the new agreement. Whoever is running the Raiders now is much crazier than Al.

The beauty of this statement is that it's Al's son running the team currently.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
sjboyd0137 wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
#1 picks are worth so much more in the new agreement. Whoever is running the Raiders now is much crazier than Al.

The beauty of this statement is that it's Al's son running the team currently.


Outstanding. Proof that crazy is an inherited gene.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 2:46 pm
Posts: 6251
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I do like the move for the Raiders, need a quarterback and have a good chance at the playoffs.

Now they are giving up too much, because when you see some of the college players these today, I know it's hard to predict how it will work out, but some good players may be coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Why not keep the picks and sign David Garrard?

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Phil McCracken wrote:
Why not keep the picks and sign David Garrard?

He's having surgery. No play this year.


What a racist suggestion, BTW


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
rogers park bryan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Why not keep the picks and sign David Garrard?

He's having surgery. No play this year.


What a racist suggestion, BTW

Why not keep the picks and sign Todd Collins then

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Phil McCracken wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Why not keep the picks and sign David Garrard?

He's having surgery. No play this year.


What a racist suggestion, BTW

Why not keep the picks and sign Todd Collins then

Bibgo.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72347
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
#1 picks are worth so much more in the new agreement. Whoever is running the Raiders now is much crazier than Al.

Also, Carson Palmer sucks, so its really a bad trade.

+1. This is almost unbelievably bad. Palmer was one of the ten worst starting QB's in the league.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 90864
Location: To the left of my post
The Raiders would probably have given the Bears 2 full draft classes for Cutler. Stupid Angelo.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The Raiders would probably have given the Bears 2 full draft classes for Cutler. Stupid Angelo.

Idiot Bears Fan wrote:
If Angelo is doing the draft, I dont want those 14 picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The Raiders would probably have given the Bears 2 full draft classes for Cutler. Stupid Angelo.

Idiot Bears Fan wrote:
If Angelo is doing the draft, I dont want those 14 picks.

They should only trade for 6th rounders cause that's when that Angelos is at his best...

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
What if Palmer still doesn't want to play?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
All that remains is that a passed physical by Palmer to make the deal between the Raiders & Bengals complete. It seems like a great deal by Cincinnati with the draft picks, but for Oakland, it proves to me 2 things. First, Kyle Boller isn't a starting QB in this league. Second, I'm convinced that Terrelle Pryor simply isn't ready now that Jason Campbell's out with a broken collarbone and shoulder injury.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
SHARK wrote:
All that remains is that a passed physical by Palmer to make the deal between the Raiders & Bengals complete. It seems like a great deal by Cincinnati with the draft picks, but for Oakland, it proves to me 2 things. First, Kyle Boller isn't a starting QB in this league. Second, I'm convinced that Terrelle Pryor simply isn't ready now that Jason Campbell's out with a broken collarbone and shoulder injury.


You needed this trade to prove this? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
Big Chicagoan wrote:
SHARK wrote:
All that remains is that a passed physical by Palmer to make the deal between the Raiders & Bengals complete. It seems like a great deal by Cincinnati with the draft picks, but for Oakland, it proves to me 2 things. First, Kyle Boller isn't a starting QB in this league. Second, I'm convinced that Terrelle Pryor simply isn't ready now that Jason Campbell's out with a broken collarbone and shoulder injury.


You needed this trade to prove this? :lol:

I've heard the Raiders are a playoff team, before Campbell got injured this past Sunday. There were 2 other names before the Raiders & Bengals made this deal. One of them, the Broncos' suddenly benched Kyle Orton. The other was David Garrard, the ex-Jaguars' QB who hadn't signed with any team before it was revealed that he's about to undergo back surgery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:07 pm
Posts: 3705
apologize if someone already posted this info, but I glanced and didn't see it...

The conditional pick is whether or not the raiders win a playoff game. If they do...its a 1st rounder, if not...its a second rounder. At least that is the way I heard it.

_________________
Proud to be UNVERIFIED.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23311
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
The Raiders must think the world is going to end in 2012. Can't believe they're giving up on Terrell Pryor already.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
KDdidit wrote:
The Raiders must think the world is going to end in 2012. Can't believe they're giving up on Terrell Pryor already.

That's not quite accurate. Terrelle Pryor's not ready, even though it cost the Raiders a third round pick to draft the controversial, troubled ex-Ohio State QB.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group