It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:03 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Sox & BABIP
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:48 pm
Posts: 60
pizza_Place: Beggars
Quote:
2007 - BABIP .278, MLB Rank: 30th; 21.1% K Rate, MLB Rank: 23th
2008 - BABIP .281, MLB Rank: 29th; 18.3% K Rate, MLB Rank: 11th
2009 - BABIP .285, MLB Rank: 28th; 18.7% K Rate, MLB Rank: 7th
2010 - BABIP .292, MLB Rank: 23rd; 16.8% K Rate, MLB Rank: 2nd
2011 - BABIP .257, MLB Rank: 30th; 16.8% K Rate, MLB Rank: 2nd

Composite Totals 2007 - 2011: BABIP .283, MLB Rank: 30th; 18.6% K Rate, MLB Rank: 9th


My high-level understanding of SABRmetrics is that BABIP is an indicator of luck (more for pitchers than hitters), but what does it mean that the Sox hitters have been no better than 23rd in the last five years. Interestingly their K Rate has been good over the same period. RPB, help me out here. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox & BABIP
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 6:49 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
De Aza and Reed Johnson were 1-2 in babip in players with 150+ ab's I think


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox & BABIP
PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2011 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:33 pm
Posts: 300
Location: ICIA
pizza_Place: Magliozzi's
kmartin wrote:
Quote:
2007 - BABIP .278, MLB Rank: 30th; 21.1% K Rate, MLB Rank: 23th
2008 - BABIP .281, MLB Rank: 29th; 18.3% K Rate, MLB Rank: 11th
2009 - BABIP .285, MLB Rank: 28th; 18.7% K Rate, MLB Rank: 7th
2010 - BABIP .292, MLB Rank: 23rd; 16.8% K Rate, MLB Rank: 2nd
2011 - BABIP .257, MLB Rank: 30th; 16.8% K Rate, MLB Rank: 2nd

Composite Totals 2007 - 2011: BABIP .283, MLB Rank: 30th; 18.6% K Rate, MLB Rank: 9th


My high-level understanding of SABRmetrics is that BABIP is an indicator of luck (more for pitchers than hitters), but what does it mean that the Sox hitters have been no better than 23rd in the last five years. Interestingly their K Rate has been good over the same period. RPB, help me out here. :D

You have to compare it with line drive % to see if luck could be a factor.

_________________
Git on back there.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group