It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:11 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
Gibson is so much more active. Would Gibsons defense offset what you would lose on the offensive end? And runs the floor better too. If Hamilton and Deng are healthy, is this team better with Gibson playing more mins at the 4?

They sure seem to be against the Heat. Boozer doesnt like to be defended. Boozer shines against the Wizards, Bucks and Nets but disappears against the Heat, Pacers and Celtics. I liked it too when Gibson got switched out on Lebron a couple of times. His length bothers James.

Whats a Thibbs to do?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
The only downside right now for Gibson is his inability to create his own scoring opportunities. He just reacts to whatever offensive rebound or defensive breakdown happens on a possession. Boozer still has the ability to create space between him and his defender to get a decent look at the rim.

Defensively, Gibson is substantially stronger than Boozer. That much is obvious. However, having said all of that, I still see the whole situation as a wash: what you lack in defense from Boozer you get from Gibson, and the opposite is also true regarding offense.

Still, I could live with Gibson's youth and potential on the roster... and substantially lower contract price.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I've been saying since last year I would rather have Boozer. If GarPax knew what they know now they wouldn't have signed him.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
Right now Boozer>Gibson

Given the price over the long run, I can see keeping Gibson over Boozer though. I just hope Gibson can develop a better offensive game. If we could combine both of their games into one, that would be the perfect situation, but obviously that isn't happening.

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:18 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Free Ajent wrote:
Right now Boozer>Gibson

Given the price over the long run, I can see keeping Gibson over Boozer though. I just hope Gibson can develop a better offensive game. If we could combine both of their games into one, that would be the perfect situation, but obviously that isn't happening.


It could happen in the form of a package deal to get Dwight Howard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Free Ajent wrote:
Right now Boozer>Gibson

Given the price over the long run, I can see keeping Gibson over Boozer though. I just hope Gibson can develop a better offensive game. If we could combine both of their games into one, that would be the perfect situation, but obviously that isn't happening.


It could happen in the form of a package deal to get Dwight Howard.

True

I would love to add that piece, but if/when it ever happens, I'm happy with the team we have.

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
No one will take Boozer's contract.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
The nice thing is that it's the Bulls and you get both of them. Does anyone have their combined averages for the season?

Thibs is not going to play Boozer in the 4th Quarter if he needs defense. Surprisingly in the end of the Heat game Asik and Gibson did not play as much as other games against the Heat.

http://www.terezowens.com/carlos-boozer ... -his-wife/

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
immessedup17 wrote:
HOVA wrote:
No one will take Boozer's contract.

Untrue. I don't think it is the albatross some people want to believe it is.

It is, and it will only get worse as he gets older.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:44 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Boozer's contract is pretty bad, IMU. And it is exactly the reason why Orlando shouldn't consider trading Howard to Chicago.

If Howard goes anywhere, it will likely be to the Lakers or Nets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
312player wrote:
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

The Lakers can offer Gasol & Bynum. But is there team any better if they get Howard, but lose Gasol & Bynum? One of those guys isn't enough to make the trade, and trading both doesn't improve the team.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
If he were the main scoring option on a team...or even the cemented second scoring option on a team...and he played 35+ minutes a game...you'd be looking at a 51+ FG%, 10 or 11 RPG, 3 APG, 1 SPG, almost 1 BPG, and probably 20 to 22 PPG. That isn't terrible for 14.4M.

He'd be averaging a double-double.

It is a bad contract, considering the new CBA. Love just signed for 4 years/$62 million dollars. Boozer isn't close to a franchise guy. He's a borderline all star that doesn't play defense well.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:00 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
immessedup17 wrote:
If he were the main scoring option on a team...or even the cemented second scoring option on a team...and he played 35+ minutes a game...you'd be looking at a 51+ FG%, 10 or 11 RPG, 3 APG, 1 SPG, almost 1 BPG, and probably 20 to 22 PPG. That isn't terrible for 14.4M.

He'd be averaging a double-double.


That's a lot of "if's". The fact is that he isn't doing any of that.

Here’s all I’m saying. If I’m the Magic, I don’t want all that crap back. Noah/Boozer/Taj/ Deng….. bunch of role players who have proven they’re ok, but not great. I don’t want any part of that. Honestly, why would I want to commit that much money to those guys? Why would I want to pay Boozer $15M to get 8 points? If I’m trading Howard to anyone its going to be for a bunch of picks and maybe a young player who hasn’t’ had the chance to prove himself yet. I don’t want a big bag of crap back. Sorry, but that’s the truth from Orlando's perspective. They’re too old to turn into anything other than what they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

The Lakers can offer Gasol & Bynum. But is there team any better if they get Howard, but lose Gasol & Bynum? One of those guys isn't enough to make the trade, and trading both doesn't improve the team.

Maybe they could talk the Magic into including Ryan Anderson.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
FavreFan wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

The Lakers can offer Gasol & Bynum. But is there team any better if they get Howard, but lose Gasol & Bynum? One of those guys isn't enough to make the trade, and trading both doesn't improve the team.

Maybe they could talk the Magic into including Ryan Anderson.

I'm sure they could talk them into including Hedo.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

The Lakers can offer Gasol & Bynum. But is there team any better if they get Howard, but lose Gasol & Bynum? One of those guys isn't enough to make the trade, and trading both doesn't improve the team.




taj/noah > gasol/bynum

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
boozers contract is bad..not soriano bad , not horrible...no team is going to take that on though...the bulls can offer the most for howard..what can the lakers offer? the bulls can give up noah and taj and 2 first round picks

The Lakers can offer Gasol & Bynum. But is there team any better if they get Howard, but lose Gasol & Bynum? One of those guys isn't enough to make the trade, and trading both doesn't improve the team.




taj/noah > gasol/bynum

:lol: No

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
312player wrote:
taj/noah > gasol/bynum

I still can't figure out if your sports thoughts are real, or if you just troll this board.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
?.. gasol is 32 and bynum is hurt every year

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:10 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
If Orlando ends up trading Howard to the Bulls, then GarPax obviously knows that Rich DeVos killed someone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
love should not have signed..that team is going to suck for a long time..he will be like garnett stuck up north with no chance at a ring for a long time.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43579
312player wrote:
love should not have signed..that team is going to suck for a long time..he will be like garnett stuck up north with no chance at a ring for a long time.

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:12 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
312player wrote:
love should not have signed..that team is going to suck for a long time..he will be like garnett stuck up north with no chance at a ring for a long time.


Dude. The T-Wolves are one player away from becoming an annual playoff contender.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
annual playoff contender? :lol: .... you do realize that there are 30 teams in the nba..16 of which make the post season..so it is actually harder to not make the playoffs statistically then it is to make them.... 16>14

even if the t wolves make the playoffs yearly as a 5th or 6th seed ..they have no chance at winning the conference

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
312player wrote:
annual playoff contender? :lol: .... you do realize that there are 30 teams in the nba..16 of which make the post season..so it is actually harder to not make the playoffs statistically then it is to make them.... 16>14

even if the t wolves make the playoffs yearly as a 5th or 6th seed ..they have no chance at winning the conference


OK, fair point. But it still doesn't change the fact that the T-Wolves are a lot better than you make them out to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
i like the twolves..i liked them when they had marbury when he was very good and k.g. and that was as good is it gets up there...the clippers and ok city are good young teams that will not be losing to the twolves in the playoffs anytime soon.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
If he were the main scoring option on a team...or even the cemented second scoring option on a team...and he played 35+ minutes a game...you'd be looking at a 51+ FG%, 10 or 11 RPG, 3 APG, 1 SPG, almost 1 BPG, and probably 20 to 22 PPG. That isn't terrible for 14.4M.

He'd be averaging a double-double.

It is a bad contract, considering the new CBA. Love just signed for 4 years/$62 million dollars. Boozer isn't close to a franchise guy. He's a borderline all star that doesn't play defense well.

Because that was the max contract for Love's age.

Exactly. That's the new value of a standard four year max contract. It makes Boozer's contract clearly a liability more than an asset.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Can't they just amnesty Boozer?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Boozer or Gibson?
PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
i like the twolves..i liked them when they had marbury when he was very good and k.g. and that was as good is it gets up there...the clippers and ok city are good young teams that will not be losing to the twolves in the playoffs anytime soon.

Love and Rubio are a pretty awesome combination, they have a great coach, they could be really good a lot sooner than you think. It sounds like you're underrating Love and Rubio's potential considering how good he already is at this age and point of his rookie season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group