It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:02 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » R.I.P.

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
SomeGuy
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Baby McNown wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Really wish there was a single candidate in this election that combines fiscally conservative policies without being a social nut job


I think a lot of people think like this. It's too bad really. Why can't a candidate do both, it sounds fairly easy.

His name was John Huntsman. And he's not enough of a social nut to get the nomination from the GOP.


You think Pawlenty is kicking himself for dropping out of the race early?

Cain, Santorum, Bachmann and Will She, Won't She Palin? WTF?
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 9:21 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55985
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
bigfan wrote:
I like Maher and think he can be pretty funny but his ALS is unreal.

He can flop with a joke and follow it with a Bush sucks...and the place goes nuts.

Dead on.

Maher also has a way of lulling you into a false sense of security and then springing something totally batshit on you, like how he doesn't believe in vaccinations. Then you're just like "wait whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

Oh, and Breitbart was an irresponsible dope, but far less insidious than a great deal of conservatives.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
WhiteAndProud
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 557
pizza_Place: Taco Bell Mexican Pizza
Mr. Belvidere wrote:

The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth). Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts. Breitbart and O'keefe were forced to turn over all unedited films they had which proved Acorns innocence. The damage had been done and Acorn had to close it doors.


Whether ACORN broke any laws is beyond the point. They were a disgusting organization full of disgusting people who at no point helped a single person. Their entire raison d'etre was to invent grievances to shake down government or businesses in order to pay their do-nothing salaries. They were absolute parasites and anyone who pointed it out was called a racist.

_________________
I love Terry Boers. I hate Tim Tebow. The fact that the former will die before the latter show what a cruel, unjust world we live in.
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Belvidere
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:33 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
stoneroses86 wrote:
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts.

In what Courts was Acorn found "not guilty of any wrongdoing?"


THis one?
http://www.alan.com/2010/03/02/brooklyn ... ve-agenda/
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Belvidere
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:47 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
WhiteAndProud wrote:
Mr. Belvidere wrote:

The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth). Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts. Breitbart and O'keefe were forced to turn over all unedited films they had which proved Acorns innocence. The damage had been done and Acorn had to close it doors.


Whether ACORN broke any laws is beyond the point. They were a disgusting organization full of disgusting people who at no point helped a single person. Their entire raison d'etre was to invent grievances to shake down government or businesses in order to pay their do-nothing salaries. They were absolute parasites and anyone who pointed it out was called a racist.


Your small minded and partisan point of view doesnt surprise me. With five minutes of research, you could have saved yourself the embarrassment of looking like a fool. Acorn had their internal problems like many other organizations but your description is ignorant and pathetic. Your name pretty much gives away why you feel the way you do about Acorn and the people (blacks) they helped the most.

I'm sure this Obama propaganda website wont change your WhiteandProud mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associatio ... Reform_Now
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Politics: Andrew Breitbart: Death of a Douche

MARCH 1, 2012 | 3:10PM

So Andrew Breitbart is dead. Here's what I have to say to that, and I'm sure Breitbart himself would have respected this reaction: Good! Fuck him. I couldn't be happier that he's dead.

I say this in the nicest possible way. I actually kind of liked Andrew Breitbart. Not in the sense that I would ever have wanted to hang out with him, or even be caught within a hundred yards of him without a Haz-Mat suit on, but I respected the shamelessness. Breitbart didn't do anything by halves, and even his most ardent detractors had to admit that he had a highly developed, if not always funny, sense of humor.

For instance, it would be dishonest not to tip a hat to him for that famous scene when he hijacked Anthony Weiner's own self-immolating "apology" press conference, and held up the entire event by standing at the lectern and congratulating himself at length, before Weiner could let the humiliating healing begin.

For that one, brief, shining moment– still one of the most painful-to-watch YouTube spectacles of all time, right there with Mitt Romney's priceless attempt at singing "Who Let the Dogs Out?" with a group of black voters in Florida in 2008 – Breitbart could legitimately claim to have the biggest, hairiest balls on earth.

Watching Weiner apologize to Breitbart later in that same event was certainly chilling for a number of reasons (if I were Weiner, I wouldn't have apologized to that fucker even under torture) but it was hard not appreciate the deliciousness of the scene from Breitbart's point of view. Watching Weiner pause, swallow hard, and make the extraordinary decision to plant his lips squarely on the loathsome Breitbart's ass on national television, that was like the ultimate Mona Lisa masterpiece of right-wing media provocations. That the outrageous Breitbart was standing right there, looking gorgeously gassy in his unbuttoned shirt, bloated Joey Buttafuoco cheeks and splendiforous silver half-mullet, made the humiliation of the trim and neatly-groomed Weiner even more abject.

Furthermore, the ACORN videos made by Breitbart and his two young acolytes, Hannah Giles and James O'Keefe – it's hard not to see the inspired humor behind their elaborate stunt. And anyone who's heard their proposals before ACORN staffers to bring underage girls over the border as part of a white-(or nonwhite-) slaving startup firm, and doesn't think the ACORN responses (or non-responses, as it were) were shocking, they're deluding themselves. In the Baltimore office, they ran the whole underage hooker-den spiel past an ACORN staffer, and got the following response: "You are gonna use three of them – they are gonna be under 16, so you is eligible to get child tax credit and additional child tax credit."

That is seriously messed up material. Did they edit the videos heavily? Hell yes. Did they make ACORN's behavior out to be a lot worse than it was? Absolutely. But there's no way to watch the raw footage and not grasp how totally nuts some of this ACORN "counseling" was. We have to give Breitbart that.

Breitbart has written some nasty things about me personally, once contrived to publish my private emails online, and even teamed up with Rush Limbaugh to humorously mis-identify me as a behind-the-scenes marionettist of the "media-Democrat industrial complex" (Breitbart thought I was improperly advising Occupy leaders), but all that's okay. I think today, it's safe to stand back and simply recognize that while many people go through their lives without leaving distinguishing marks, Andrew Breitbart definitely had his moments.

But he also had enough of a sense of humor to appreciate why someone like me shouldn't bother to pretend I'm sad he's dead. He wouldn't, in my place. So to use one of his favorite words: Good riddance, cocksucker.* Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

* See the following Breitbart quote: "I like to call someone a raving Caller Bob every now and then, when it's appropriate, for effect... 'You cocksucker.' I love that kind of language."

http://m.rollingstone.com/entry/view/id/23017/pn/all/p/0/?KSID=c46161f54fc477e71675a54b626951c9&ints_viewed=1

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Mr. Belvidere
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:14 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:04 am
Posts: 2251
Kind of strange how so many that hated the guy took the high road after his death. Like the article said- he would have preferred honesty instead of bullshit. And he was a fellow Atheist. Most Conservatives didnt know that.
Top
 Profile  
 
WhiteAndProud
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 1:41 am
Posts: 557
pizza_Place: Taco Bell Mexican Pizza
Mr. Belvidere wrote:

Your small minded and partisan point of view doesnt surprise me. With five minutes of research, you could have saved yourself the embarrassment of looking like a fool. Acorn had their internal problems like many other organizations but your description is ignorant and pathetic. Your name pretty much gives away why you feel the way you do about Acorn and the people (blacks) they helped the most.

I'm sure this Obama propaganda website wont change your WhiteandProud mind.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Associatio ... Reform_Now


I'm guessing you think that Jesse Jackson is a civil rights leader whose ass deserves our most tender kisses, rather than a hustler devoted to enriching his family and friends and stroking his ego by jumping in front of every camera he can find.

Anyone with any experience in Chicago media or politics would have told you the exact same thing I said about ACORN and we've known it for years before anyone has even heard of Andrew Breitbart. Go back to watching MSNBC and jerking off to Rachel Maddow and leave politics to people who've actually gotten off their ass and accomplished something.

And I'm partisan? There's not a chance I'm voting for a Republicunt who supported our imperialism in Iraq, Afghanistan, and (soon to be) Iran.

_________________
I love Terry Boers. I hate Tim Tebow. The fact that the former will die before the latter show what a cruel, unjust world we live in.
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:17 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55985
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Shock of shocks that Tall Midget dropped raison d'être on us.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Chicagoan
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
WhiteAndProud wrote:
No matter what else he did, He was responsible for bringing down ACORN and we should all be thankful for that. ACORN was made up of the most disgusting annoying people on the face of Earth and they all deserve to witness their children being raped and disemboweled. They were evil shakedown snakes who did not help a single person. They made Jesse Jackson look like a Saint.


The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth). Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts. Breitbart and O'keefe were forced to turn over all unedited films they had which proved Acorns innocence. The damage had been done and Acorn had to close it doors. Breitbart was also behind the Shirley Sherrod fiasco a couple years ago. He cut a tape of a speech and edited up to make her look like a racist.

It may sound mean but I being honest. Breitbart was a lying piece of shit. Just because he died doesnt change that. Brietbarts TWEETS after Ted Kennedy passed away show what kind of guy he was.

Image


Ted Kennedy was a murderer. Literally.
Top
 Profile  
 
W_Z
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37845
Location: ...
breitbart was kinda the right's version of michael moore.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Curious Hair wrote:
bigfan wrote:
I like Maher and think he can be pretty funny but his ALS is unreal.

He can flop with a joke and follow it with a Bush sucks...and the place goes nuts.

Dead on.

Maher also has a way of lulling you into a false sense of security and then springing something totally batshit on you, like how he doesn't believe in vaccinations. Then you're just like "wait whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"

I'm a pretty big Maher fan and I DVR his show every week, but I don't think I've ever heard him say that.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Regular Reader
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
W_Z wrote:
breitbart was kinda the right's version of michael moore.


No.

Not even close. There was no appreciable sense of decency, honesty or integrity coming from Breitbart. Ever.

Imo.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.
Top
 Profile  
 
HOVA
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
W_Z wrote:
breitbart was kinda the right's version of michael moore.


No.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.
Top
 Profile  
 
stoneroses86
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Mr. Belvidere wrote:
Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts.

In what Courts was Acorn found "not guilty of any wrongdoing?"


THis one?
http://www.alan.com/2010/03/02/brooklyn ... ve-agenda/

Okay. You have an interesting definition of "found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts." You see, that is a very specific phrase, which most intelligent people might take to mean an actual finding of "not guilty" after an actual Trial. I certainly interpreted it this way.

As opposed to a unilateral decision made by a Democrat District Attorney. In Brooklyn!

"The irony to this is you neglected (as Breitbart was famous for) to tell the entire story (truth)."

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI
Top
 Profile  
 
KDdidit
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Speaking of courts, hopefully Shirley Sherrod gets a nice chunk of his estate.
Top
 Profile  
 
stoneroses86
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
But he has already been "cleared by the Courts!" Meaning some individual in some unknown state has probably unilaterally determined that he did nothing wrong.

Seriously, though, he screwed that one up.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI
Top
 Profile  
 
HOVA
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
No he didn't. He did what he normally does. It was the Obama administration that screwed that one up.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.
Top
 Profile  
 
stoneroses86
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
HOVA wrote:
It was the Obama administration that screwed that one up.

There certainly seemed to be a lack of testosterone exhibited.

I am still waiting to read about all those actual Court cases in which "Acorn was found not guilty of any wrong doing by the courts."

I will not accept a liberal District Attorney in ultra-conservative Brooklyn (sarcasm) declining to press charges.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI
Top
 Profile  
 
Chus
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
bigfan wrote:
I like Maher and think he can be pretty funny but his ALS is unreal.

He can flop with a joke and follow it with a Bush sucks...and the place goes nuts.


The discussions with the panel are more entertaining than his monologue. The punch lines to his jokes can be seen a mile away.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way
Top
 Profile  
 
Krazy Ivan
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
I still have no idea who this guy is...

_________________
This is my signature...
Top
 Profile  
 
Brick
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I still have no idea who this guy is...
He's either the world's greatest person and a hero and a patriot or the spawn of Satan who is worse than Hitler.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!
Top
 Profile  
 
NearWessSideHussra
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 6:31 pm
Posts: 6513
pizza_Place: sit down
Krazy Ivan wrote:
I still have no idea who this guy is...



Image
Top
 Profile  
 
rogers park bryan
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I really dont understand how anyone can still cling to one side of the aisle or the other in this country

We have so many 100% Democrats and 100% Republicans it makes me sick.


And its hilarious that many of these people would scoff and say they "choose the best candidate" while towing the party line all the while
Top
 Profile  
 
HOVA
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
I saw a graph or video showing that every Democratic and Republican president in the last 50 years has been more conservative than his predecessor from the same party. The graph showed that Republicans had made the biggest jump to the right but Democrats were still going in that direction. That's basically why Reagan wouldn't get nominated by Republicans today.

Most people don't cling to one side or the other. They vote for the candidate that shares their beliefs or the one they like the most.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.
Top
 Profile  
 
SomeGuy
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
HOVA wrote:
I saw a graph or video showing that every Democratic and Republican president in the last 50 years has been more conservative than his predecessor from the same party. The graph showed that Republicans had made the biggest jump to the right but Democrats were still going in that direction. That's basically why Reagan wouldn't get nominated by Republicans today.

Most people don't cling to one side or the other. They vote for the candidate that shares their beliefs or the one they like the most.



Whaaaaaaa?
Top
 Profile  
 
HOVA
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
SomeGuy wrote:
HOVA wrote:
I saw a graph or video showing that every Democratic and Republican president in the last 50 years has been more conservative than his predecessor from the same party. The graph showed that Republicans had made the biggest jump to the right but Democrats were still going in that direction. That's basically why Reagan wouldn't get nominated by Republicans today.

Most people don't cling to one side or the other. They vote for the candidate that shares their beliefs or the one they like the most.



Whaaaaaaa?


Voters are becoming more and more independent. Unlike someguy's that post here most voters don't cling to a side just because they share their beliefs. I didn't vote for Blago even though he shared most of mine and I would have voted for McCain over Hillary (if Palin wasn't selected). In fact for the 7 years I've been posting hear I've noticed conservatives are the ones that are the most closed minded.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.
Top
 Profile  
 
SomeGuy
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
HOVA wrote:
SomeGuy wrote:
HOVA wrote:
I saw a graph or video showing that every Democratic and Republican president in the last 50 years has been more conservative than his predecessor from the same party. The graph showed that Republicans had made the biggest jump to the right but Democrats were still going in that direction. That's basically why Reagan wouldn't get nominated by Republicans today.

Most people don't cling to one side or the other. They vote for the candidate that shares their beliefs or the one they like the most.



Whaaaaaaa?


Voters are becoming more and more independent. Unlike someguy's that post here most voters don't cling to a side just because they share their beliefs. I didn't vote for Blago even though he shared most of mine and I would have voted for McCain over Hillary (if Palin wasn't selected). In fact for the 7 years I've been posting hear I've noticed conservatives are the ones that are the most closed minded.


Is that a not so veiled shot at me? If it is it would be completely incorrect.
Top
 Profile  
 
rogers park bryan
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas, if that's true its not representative of the political discussions in this country

Whether its on TV, radio, a message board, a bar, a korean massage place, or a church group it ALWAYS becomes a right vs left who is worse argument
Top
 Profile  
 
The Original Kid Cairo
 Post subject: Re: Andrew Breitbart
PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
rogers park bryan wrote:
Nas, if that's true its not representative of the political discussions in this country

Whether its on TV, radio, a message board, a bar, a korean massage place, or a church group it ALWAYS becomes a right vs left who is worse argument

Yes. Kinda like how Chicago baseball fans can't just talk baseball without it becoming Sox vs. Cubs.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 100 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » GENERAL BULLSHIT SECTION » R.I.P.

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group