good dolphin wrote:
This may end up being a 100 loss team.
I really hate that KW wasn't replaced along with Ozzie as he is the wrong person for the job when selling off players for prospects. I wouldn't be shocked if nothing came out of KW off season moves.
One thing that came out of it was losing $25 million in payroll. And come on, dolphin. No way this team is losing 100 games. I'm not going to sit here and tell you they're going to contend with Detroit, but they'll almost certainly be better than last season.
And as far as Detroit goes, people look at things in strange ways. Did Prince Fielder really improve them from last year? The quick thoughtless answer is, "Of course, don't be ridiculous!" But anyone who says that better go look at the year Victor Martinez had in 2011. Is Fielder really going to do a whole lot better than that? He'll hit more homeruns, sure. He'll probably be a little better however you want to measure it. But does his extra production come in critical places? That's what makes baseball so interesting. It's a funny game.
I listen to idiots on the radio blast a guy like Juan Pierre because "he doesn't get on". A top leadoff man gets on 36% of the time. In 550 PA, that's 198 times on base. A guy at 32% "doesn't get on enough". But he actually gets on 176 times in the same 550 PA. How significant are those extra 22 times on base? How many of them make the slightest difference in the outcome of a game?