It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Forte is obviously very good, but I think his numbers are inflated a bit because it was the Martz offense and because the Bears WRs were so goddam awful, he was the only guy you could depend on. At least now they have a bonafide #1 WR, which only makes Bennett better.

THe Bears have wasted too much $ on the RB position the last 3 years. Invest the $ in getting the OLine top tier, and a middle of the road back will be very productive. The Bears had a long term offer on the table for Forte, and he didn't sign it. At that point, you franchise tag him, offer him that again (with a little higher per year and/or guaranteed) and if he doesn't sign it then, you entertain offers to move him.


Damn Frank. You & I agree! :o

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
You're not going to get anything in return for Forte in a trade since his salary demands are so high.


Yes they would. There are many teams that would be willing to give up a 1st Round pick and more for his production. He's a top 5 back IMO and only haters would put him lower than a top 10 back.

No fuckin way.

Running backs are waaaaaay too easy to find. Not to mention all the miles Forte has

No one really trades for RB anymore.

Unfortunately for Forte, he came along at a time where RB have never mattered less.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
If the Bears put Forte on the block many teams would be willing to give up a 1st round pick. The guy has the 3rd most yards (even though he missed games) since he's been in the league playing with some of the worst offenses in the league. That means he was the guy teams game planned for. We're not talking about an average back. Forte is an elite RB.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 12:52 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
If a team offers a 1st round pick you do it IMMEDIATELY.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
RFDC wrote:
If a team offers a 1st round pick you do it IMMEDIATELY.


No you don't. Not unless it's a top 10 pick. You don't trade clearly the best player on your team for the Giants draft pick. That would be stupid.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
RFDC you must be one of the people that has too much caffeine. I'm not mad at either side. Both are right. FF is in line with what I think he deserves, I hope he gets close to that with 17-18 guaranteed. If they are offering less then the Bears are shitty if Forte is asking for more then he's wrong.

If I was worried about Cutler's backup I'd be suprised because I think I've used the phrase for QBs it's boom or bust. I don't want a total incompetent like whoever was in front of hainie last year but I'm really not concerned with back up qbs. RBs are slightly different I'd like a better back up or really good tandem because the chance of injury is higher. I think you are making a wrong assumption because you want to, and I have no idea why?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82232
all this concern about petty posturing...he's a bear for at least the next two years

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
If the Bears put Forte on the block many teams would be willing to give up a 1st round pick. The guy has the 3rd most yards (even though he missed games) since he's been in the league playing with some of the worst offenses in the league. That means he was the guy teams game planned for. We're not talking about an average back. Forte is an elite RB.

Giving up a 1st rd pick for ANY running back is ill advised in today's NFL.

It would be even worse to do it for a guy with a 1,000 carries.


The difference between top RB's and middle running backs you can find in the 2nd or 3rd rd of a draft is not big enough anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
good dolphin wrote:
all this concern about petty posturing...he's a bear for at least the next two years


Next year, if they franchise him, they have to pay 125% of this years salary guaranteed. I don't think they do it. This will be Forte's last year in a Bears uniform.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:07 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC you must be one of the people that has too much caffeine. I'm not mad at either side. Both are right. FF is in line with what I think he deserves, I hope he gets close to that with 17-18 guaranteed. If they are offering less then the Bears are shitty if Forte is asking for more then he's wrong.

If I was worried about Cutler's backup I'd be suprised because I think I've used the phrase for QBs it's boom or bust. I don't want a total incompetent like whoever was in front of hainie last year but I'm really not concerned with back up qbs. RBs are slightly different I'd like a better back up or really good tandem because the chance of injury is higher. I think you are making a wrong assumption because you want to, and I have no idea why?


Yep thats me too much caffeine.

I am making my statements based on what YOU have stated.

You want the Bears to do the wrong/dumb thing because your heart likes Forte.

I like Forte too, but I would be glad to see him go rather than the Bears to spend too much money on him. They can find another RB.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Big Chicagoan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
all this concern about petty posturing...he's a bear for at least the next two years


Next year, if they franchise him, they have to pay 125% of this years salary guaranteed. I don't think they do it. This will be Forte's last year in a Bears uniform.


I doubt they'll cry about paying him $9M if he's still producing at an elite level.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
it will be more like 10 million next year and no chance at that happening and no chance at any team giving a first round pick for forte ..none..zero..

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
RFDC wrote:
Yep thats me too much caffeine.

I am making my statements based on what YOU have stated.

You want the Bears to do the wrong/dumb thing because your heart likes Forte.

I like Forte too, but I would be glad to see him go rather than the Bears to spend too much money on him. They can find another RB.



No you're not. And I don't think it's be all that dumb to reward him.

What's a fair value for him? 30 for 4 years 17 guaranteed? Which he'll make if they franchise him 2 years but not risking the injury or working him part. I might try giving 25 but guarantee the 17. What's too much? Too little? I wouldn't have taken 8M guaranteed either consider that's almost what he'll make this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 3414
pizza_Place: Gino's East.
Spaulding wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Yep thats me too much caffeine.

I am making my statements based on what YOU have stated.

You want the Bears to do the wrong/dumb thing because your heart likes Forte.

I like Forte too, but I would be glad to see him go rather than the Bears to spend too much money on him. They can find another RB.



No you're not. And I don't think it's be all that dumb to reward him.

What's a fair value for him? 30 for 4 years 17 guaranteed? Which he'll make if they franchise him 2 years but not risking the injury or working him part. I might try giving 25 but guarantee the 17. What's too much? Too little? I wouldn't have taken 8M guaranteed either consider that's almost what he'll make this year.


The Bears offered him more --- around $14M guaranteed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NSJ wrote:

The Bears offered him more --- around $14M guaranteed.


We all saw the numbers before the season started. It was for 3 years and $18M. Angelo's argument was he should get a discount for doing a deal before Forte's contract was up. Forte asked for $21M and Jerry drew a line in the sand. They said they would discuss it after the season. Considering how low the franchise number was it made no sense for the Bears to rush.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 2:56 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
Spaulding wrote:
No you're not.


Spaulding wrote:
I might be the only one but I feel pretty bad for Forte.


Spaulding wrote:
I've always said I like Forte so there is some follow the heart train of thought going on.


Next.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33815
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
What does that prove? I think he will continue to produce and is deserving of that money. Especially since he has been cooperative in the past, and they asked a lot from him. He deserves to be paid and is valuable to the team. His "back up" is getting half his contract guaranteed. How much money did they spend on the others? They've had crap RBs for about 15 years.

I'm not blaming the Bears for what they are doing. I don't like it though.

Nas wrote:
NSJ wrote:

The Bears offered him more --- around $14M guaranteed.


We all saw the numbers before the season started. It was for 3 years and $18M. Angelo's argument was he should get a discount for doing a deal before Forte's contract was up. Forte asked for $21M and Jerry drew a line in the sand. They said they would discuss it after the season. Considering how low the franchise number was it made no sense for the Bears to rush.


Disappointing they each couldn't have gone up/down 3-4M. Maybe it would have done it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
not sure where you come up with these numbers...forte was offered more money than jamal charles..he turned it down..forte fucked up and now he will have to stay healthy and produce to make that money back.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:41 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57240
I am basing my opinions off of what you said.

No you're not.

Proof shown.

Well that don't prove anything.

:lol:

Nevermind spaulding. Nevermind.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
not sure where you come up with these numbers...forte was offered more money than jamal charles..he turned it down..forte fucked up and now he will have to stay healthy and produce to make that money back.


He would have had to stay healthy no matter what. NFL contracts are not guaranteed and as we've all just saw with Peyton Manning guaranteed money isn't always GUARANTEED.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
not sure where you come up with these numbers...forte was offered more money than jamal charles..he turned it down..forte fucked up and now he will have to stay healthy and produce to make that money back.


He would have had to stay healthy no matter what. NFL contracts are not guaranteed and as we've all just saw with Peyton Manning guaranteed money isn't always GUARANTEED.

Peyton is just about to get another 90 MIL deal though

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:56 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Phil McCracken wrote:
Nas wrote:
312player wrote:
not sure where you come up with these numbers...forte was offered more money than jamal charles..he turned it down..forte fucked up and now he will have to stay healthy and produce to make that money back.


He would have had to stay healthy no matter what. NFL contracts are not guaranteed and as we've all just saw with Peyton Manning guaranteed money isn't always GUARANTEED.

Peyton is just about to get another 90 MIL deal though


True but the way contracts are written the "guaranteed" portion of it is bullshit most of the time. It's all about what you can get in the first year or two of the contract.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
True but the way contracts are written the "guaranteed" portion of it is bullshit most of the time. It's all about what you can get in the first year or two of the contract.

Yeah but then its better to keep getting deals blown up and getting a new signing bonus cause that's money in the bank.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Phil McCracken wrote:
Nas wrote:
True but the way contracts are written the "guaranteed" portion of it is bullshit most of the time. It's all about what you can get in the first year or two of the contract.

Yeah but then its better to keep getting deals blown up and getting a new signing bonus cause that's money in the bank.


If you're as good as Manning that'll happen. Only a couple players can say that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Nas wrote:
True but the way contracts are written the "guaranteed" portion of it is bullshit most of the time. It's all about what you can get in the first year or two of the contract.

Yeah but then its better to keep getting deals blown up and getting a new signing bonus cause that's money in the bank.


If you're as good as Manning that'll happen. Only a couple players can say that.

And Matt Forte isn't one of them so he should have taken the contract when he had it on the table

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Just because he isn't Manning doesn't mean he should take a terrible contract. That's foolish to even say something like that. Especially considering he could make what they offered him for 3 years in 2 years if he stays healthy.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
Just because he isn't Manning doesn't mean he should take a terrible contract. That's foolish to even say something like that. Especially considering he could make what they offered him for 3 years in 2 years if he stays healthy.

Fair enough. But if that's his plan then don't bitch about the Bears hedging their bets and bringing in a capable backup. Football has more turnover than any other sport. The Bears just saw what having shitty depth at QB and RB costs you. If Hanie and Barber manage 1 win they are in the playoffs.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Here is where we agree:

Signing Bush improved the team.
Signing Bush was also smart because it protects them from Forte holding out.
The way they're handling Forte is a smart business move.

Here is where we disagree:

Forte has the right to complain and attempt to negotiate the best deal for himself.
Forte shouldn't accept a deal that's half the deal Lynch got.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Nas wrote:
Here is where we disagree:

Forte has the right to complain and attempt to negotiate the best deal for himself.
Forte shouldn't accept a deal that's half the deal Lynch got.

I actually agree with the second part of that as well. I just think he shouldn't bitch about it. He made his choice and the Bears made theirs. The NFL is a cut throat business. This is just one of those things that because there is so much access to athletes these days with Twitter and everything something they might have said just with some friends or to their agent now gets broadcast to everyone.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92068
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Forte has the right to complain and attempt to negotiate the best deal for himself.
Agreed. He's going to have to wait 2 more years though.
Nas wrote:
Forte shouldn't accept a deal that's half the deal Lynch got.
If he's willing to take the chance that he won't get injured or decline in production the next two years he shouldn't.

I just hope he doesn't complain if he gets injured this year and loses even more money because of it. He had another option.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 103 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: RFDC and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group