It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 3:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 1:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Curious Hair wrote:
. We need a big stay-at-home lumbering ogre at defense. .



We need two of them, not just one.


Putting Keith, Leddy and Oduya in your top 5 is basically an admission that you don't care about getting past the 1st round of the playoffs. 3 small players in the same unit is a huge mistake and one look at this year's playoffs and the teams that are doing well should've made that quite obvious.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
crosscheck wrote:
crosscheck wrote:
At this point I just want the Hawks to lineup with the same back six just to see Dan's heart break :lol:

One piece of the cog is returning; Oduya back for 3 years, I like him...



3.3 is overpaying for a guy that got absolutely pantsed in the playoffs.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:53 pm
Posts: 7823
Location: Gai Paree
pizza_Place: Pisa Pizza, Countryside
shakes wrote:

You're not a Hawks fan, why would you get it? That would require actually watching Hawks games.


Anyone who doesn't understand why Oduya is a bad signing is either hockey retarded or didn't watch any Hawks playoff games this year.

He was the only one who moved the puck with confidence and he's reliable in his own zone, so he's Swedish and a little undersized; pair him with Curious' ogre and all is well... Let's see what Stan does with the second center position before you shoot him



Quote:
3.3 is overpaying for a guy that got absolutely pantsed in the playoffs.

He would have commanded more on the open market, I would have been a lot happier with a smaller number, but I think it's a win. When I think of why they lost, lack of energy and a shittly pp comes to mind a lot faster than poor little ol Oduya...

_________________
team Mully & Hanley
team Meatpants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
crosscheck wrote:
shakes wrote:

You're not a Hawks fan, why would you get it? That would require actually watching Hawks games.


Anyone who doesn't understand why Oduya is a bad signing is either hockey retarded or didn't watch any Hawks playoff games this year.

He was the only one who moved the puck with confidence and he's reliable in his own zone, so he's Swedish and a little undersized; pair him with Curious' ogre and all is well... Let's see what Stan does with the second center position before you shoot him



..


Did you even watch a single Hawks playoff game? He didn't move the puck at all and he was the worst player in the series in his own zone, even worse than Leddy.


Just stick to your Kings, liking more than one team isn't something anyone over the age of 13 should be doing anyway.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:53 pm
Posts: 7823
Location: Gai Paree
pizza_Place: Pisa Pizza, Countryside
shakes wrote:

Did you even watch a single Hawks playoff game? He didn't move the puck at all and he was the worst player in the series in his own zone, even worse than Leddy.


Just stick to your Kings, liking more than one team isn't something anyone over the age of 13 should be doing anyway.


:lol:
You're trying to get to me, but it's just not going to happen...

He's a scapegoat, if the hawks had any sort of pp or goaltending, you wouldn't be pissed about this...

_________________
team Mully & Hanley
team Meatpants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55932
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Well shit, if it's $3.375 for three years of Oduya, now I'm not sure it's such a good move. Probably could've had Garrison for $4.5 and addressed a more pressing need.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 3:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
The Mayers signing is nothing. It works, it's cheap. Fine.

Oduya I'm not extremely pleased about, but it's hard to be angry when we haven't seen the big picture yet of what they're going to do with free agency.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:53 pm
Posts: 7823
Location: Gai Paree
pizza_Place: Pisa Pizza, Countryside
Curious Hair wrote:
Well shit, if it's $3.375 for three years of Oduya, now I'm not sure it's such a good move.

Image

_________________
team Mully & Hanley
team Meatpants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55932
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
It gets worse. Capgeek is reporting $3,383,333 for three years. Frontloaded as usual, so he'll make $4MM this year. Ooookay. $650,000 for Mayers, which isn't bad.

We have about $23 million committed to a defensive corps that really lacks physical presence. Gonna be another year of getting pushed around by replacement-level oafs on the Dallas Stars, huh.

Hmm. Capgeek also says we need to make Brandon Bollig a qualifying offer of $545,000. Let's not. That money can be better spent on repainting the dashers.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Somebody is going to get shipped out. They will have plenty o' cap space when that happens.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
spanky wrote:
Somebody is going to get shipped out. They will have plenty o' cap space when that happens.


Sharp?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
RFDC wrote:
spanky wrote:
Somebody is going to get shipped out. They will have plenty o' cap space when that happens.


Sharp?

Possibly.

Given Bowman's comments yesterday and some of the columns out today, I wouldn't be surprised if it's all part of preparing the public for Kane's departure also.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
In terms of players that actually have some value.

Players I'd be Actively Shopping:
Sharp
Hammer
Stalberg (due for a pay raise soon, maybe someone will overpay)

I'm listening, but you'd have to blow me away
Bolland
Keith
Leddy


No Chance
Toews
Kane
Seabrook
Hossa

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
spanky wrote:
Possibly.

Given Bowman's comments yesterday and some of the columns out today, I wouldn't be surprised if it's all part of preparing the public for Kane's departure also.


What's been said? It'd be interesting to see how they do without him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I watched parts of every Hawks game this year. I'll be the first to admit I don't understand hockey anywhere near the level of CH and others in this thread. But if the Hawks had any kind of power play this year, they would have gone a lot farther. Plus their goal tending sucked. I have always stated that the PP misses Campbell, and they just can't enter the zone with who they have. I have no clue how getting a big defenseman and other tough guys is going to change the PP. As for goal tending, I can recall many games where we outshot the other team by up to 2-1, and yet we lost the game.

Reading Rozner, he agrees that the Hawks are way too soft. I am not certain. I don't mind the speed and skill game, but you have to score consistently on the PP and have much better goal tending. Those are my worries.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Spaulding wrote:
spanky wrote:
Possibly.

Given Bowman's comments yesterday and some of the columns out today, I wouldn't be surprised if it's all part of preparing the public for Kane's departure also.


What's been said? It'd be interesting to see how they do without him.

They are "disappointed" they are dealing with consequences "in house", etc. Big column in today's S-T quoting teams officials as being a lot more upset than that.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Northside_Dan wrote:
In terms of players that actually have some value.

Players I'd be Actively Shopping:
Sharp
Hammer
Stalberg (due for a pay raise soon, maybe someone will overpay)

I'm listening, but you'd have to blow me away
Bolland
Keith
Leddy


No Chance
Toews
Kane
Seabrook
Hossa

Toews is the only player that is anywhere near the "untouchable" status on this team.

And you can keep actively shopping Hammer all you want, there will be a lot of dead air on the other end of the line unless you throw in somebody else with him.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Spanky, it sounds like a lot of the Hawks problems are behind the scenes. It's hard to believe all the crap with personnel decisions and on ice coaching between Bowman and Q. You'd think these guys would be more professional about it. Long term, I don't see this tandem working together, and here's hoping Q is gone. I can't take another year of his useless line juggling.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
denisdman wrote:
Spanky, it sounds like a lot of the Hawks problems are behind the scenes. It's hard to believe all the crap with personnel decisions and on ice coaching between Bowman and Q.

Definitely seems that way. May be time for McDonough and Rocky to actually do some work to try and clean things up.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55932
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
They're not moving Kane or Sharp.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Curious Hair wrote:
They're not moving Kane or Sharp.

Why make any public comments (on or off the record, both were done) about an of-age player drinking in public?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I don't know what to expect. I blame the coaching staff more than anyone. The team has a lot of talent, and underperformed in many areas. I love seeing people debate the bottom portion of the roster, and thus forgetting that our top defensive pairing plays half the game, and the 2nd pairing takes up a large portion of the balance. The same for the top forward lines. "If we could just swap out the bottom five guys, all would be good." No, if your top players play like top players, the bottom 20% wouldn't matter.

Just my weak opinion....

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:53 pm
Posts: 7823
Location: Gai Paree
pizza_Place: Pisa Pizza, Countryside
spanky wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
They're not moving Kane or Sharp.

Why make any public comments (on or off the record, both were done) about an of-age player drinking in public?

I would think that if they were trying to trade him, they would want to downplay that story as much as possible to other teams before worrying about fan perception.

_________________
team Mully & Hanley
team Meatpants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 30, 2012 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
denisdman wrote:
I watched parts of every Hawks game this year. I'll be the first to admit I don't understand hockey anywhere near the level of CH and others in this thread. But if the Hawks had any kind of power play this year, they would have gone a lot farther. Plus their goal tending sucked. I have always stated that the PP misses Campbell, and they just can't enter the zone with who they have. I have no clue how getting a big defenseman and other tough guys is going to change the PP. As for goal tending, I can recall many games where we outshot the other team by up to 2-1, and yet we lost the game.

Reading Rozner, he agrees that the Hawks are way too soft. I am not certain. I don't mind the speed and skill game, but you have to score consistently on the PP and have much better goal tending. Those are my worries.


Hawks were not soft. They got in plenty of fights and WOULD have brought the forecheck if they weren't so paranoid about their play after the massive losing streak. That streak made that locker room eat itself from the inside out before it was oddly galvanized by the Toews injury.

The special teams must improve. If it doesn't, they'll be one and done again after another hair-ripping season of maddening hockey. I'm holding my breath on free agency/the draft/young gun development, but it's a dangerous game they're playing, and some of those valuable pieces like Sharp, Hammer, etc may have to be moved simply to send a message if it becomes clear early on that 2012 is a lost season.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
Dewskie wrote:
Hawks were not soft. They got in plenty of fights and WOULD have brought the forecheck if they weren't so paranoid about their play after the massive losing streak. That streak made that locker room eat itself from the inside out before it was oddly galvanized by the Toews injury.

The special teams must improve. If it doesn't, they'll be one and done again after another hair-ripping season of maddening hockey. I'm holding my breath on free agency/the draft/young gun development, but it's a dangerous game they're playing, and some of those valuable pieces like Sharp, Hammer, etc may have to be moved simply to send a message if it becomes clear early on that 2012 is a lost season.



They may have had some fights, but they were soft in much more important areas of the game, namely the ability to win board battles and clear people out in front of the net. Soft may not be the right word as opposed to saying small and weak. Or disinterested if you're talking about a guy like Bickell. Hawks will never be able to win in the playoffs if they can't control the boards and the real estate in front of the net.


Obviously special teams were a huge failure this year. i don't expect that to improve until we have new coaches.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
shakes wrote:
They may have had some fights, but they were soft in much more important areas of the game, namely the ability to win board battles and clear people out in front of the net. Soft may not be the right word as opposed to saying small and weak.


Nail on the head, man. Their failure to establish a presence in front of the opposing net killed them. As far as Bickell goes, that asshole had the worst season of his career right up until playoff time when he turned it around.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Limitless Suter/Parise talk at this point. Right now the team is 7.7 or so short of the cap. That's not including the expected shipping over Hammer which would put them over 11 short depending on the contract they get back.

Huet's 5 off the books helps things greatly right now. They definitely have room for one at this point, would need some more messing with the roster, Rockford if Rocky is willing, to get both. Doubt they sign either

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
FORWARDS
Viktor Stalberg ($0.875m) / Jonathan Toews ($6.300m) / Marian Hossa ($5.275m)
Zach Parise ($8.000m) / Patrick Sharp ($5.900m) / Patrick Kane ($6.300m)
Bryan Bickell ($0.542m) / Dave Bolland ($3.375m) / Jimmy Hayes ($0.875m)
Daniel Carcillo ($0.825m) / Marcus Kruger ($0.900m) / Jamal Mayers ($0.650m)
Brandon Bollig ($0.575m) / Andrew Shaw ($0.565m) /
DEFENSEMEN
Brent Seabrook ($5.800m) / Duncan Keith ($5.538m)
Ryan Suter ($7.000m) / Johnny Oduya ($3.383m)
Nick Leddy ($1.117m) / Sheldon Brookbank ($1.250m)
GOALTENDERS
Corey Crawford ($2.667m)
Ray Emery ($1.150m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $70,200,000; CAP PAYROLL: $68,861,794; BONUSES: $587,500
CAP SPACE (22-man roster): $1,338,206

8) 8)

Edit: Forgot about Saad in that lineup

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
Blackhawks and Montreal discussing Kane trade??

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/John-Jae ... /128/45505
Quote:
I'm chasing down the validity of a rumor this morning involving the Hawks and the Montreal Canadiens, first reported yesterday by Eklund.

Independently, I have heard of discussions between the two teams going back a number of weeks, and specifically involving Patrick Kane. I would classify these as more vague rumors, coming from sources I don't know that well.

Last night, a friend tipped me on a rumored proposal that would have the Hawks sending Kane and Niklas Hjalmarsson to the Habs for Tomas Plekanec and PK Subban. And the Hawks are allegedly holding out for the Canadiens to add a high draft pick or two.

When I pressed him for more details and back story, it turned out this allegedly has as its source a fairly highly placed person in the Canadiens' organization. I am presently checking with some Hawk sources on this.

But there are some dots that would seem to connect here. Underlying the Montreal rumors I have heard has been a strong desire on the part of new Montreal GM Marc Bergevin to obtain Kane.

Also, Subban fits the Hawks blueline needs like a glove—arguably better than Ryan Suter because of Subban's power play skill and right handed shot.

Plekanec obviously slips perfectly into the second line center role, where he could be a very nice complement to Marian Hossa.

Montreal gets a creative, highlight reel offensive player in Kane and a solid second pairing d-man with some unfulfilled offensive upside in Hjalmarsson.

In my opinion, if valid, this is an example of a deal where the Hawks would be stupid not to to at least consider dealing Kane—whether you think they 'should' or should not' in the absence of an actual deal on the table.

And if Bergevin's interest in Kane is as legitimate as I hear, then there could be something to this story after all.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:06 pm
Posts: 2202
Location: Champaign, IL
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Hmm. I wouldn't be against this but it would initially be pretty damned unusual.

J-Rog is tweeting about apparently mutual interest between Doan and the Blackhawks, but I don't think it's going to happen because of $.

_________________
Quote:
When it comes to the Bears, America is just a slobbering shitwagon. Every single opinion of his regarding this team is the most pristine of doomsday horseshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 124 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group