It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 4:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Forte is quite a bit better back then Gore. You might be the only one that thinks that is close. Bush is better then Walker. Stop trying to say otherwise, it's not close. Really.

No, none of that is true. You're only saying that because you are hopelessly biased as a Bears fan. I hate both teams equally(in reality I don't really hate either team). Most objective people say its pretty close, because it is. Forte is a better pass catcher and blocker, Gore is a better pure runner. Bush is a great 2nd back, probably second only to Ben Tate in the nfl, but Kendall Walker could be better than anyone we are talking about right now. He's very good for his short time in the nfl and what he's been asked to do.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
FavreFan wrote:
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Forte is quite a bit better back then Gore. You might be the only one that thinks that is close. Bush is better then Walker. Stop trying to say otherwise, it's not close. Really.

No, none of that is true. You're only saying that because you are hopelessly biased as a Bears fan. I hate both teams equally(in reality I don't really hate either team). Most objective people say its pretty close, because it is. Forte is a better pass catcher and blocker, Gore is a better pure runner. Bush is a great 2nd back, probably second only to Ben Tate in the nfl, but Kendall Walker could be better than anyone we are talking about right now. He's very good for his short time in the nfl and what he's been asked to do.


And you're not hating on Forte/Bush because your a biased Packers fan?

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 3715
Location: The Kingdom of Gene Siegel
Since the Bears' defense is a notch below the 49ers' I'm going with a shootout win for GB. 45-41 type game. They can't afford to go 0-2.

_________________
Back off, Warchild. Seriously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Forte is quite a bit better back then Gore. You might be the only one that thinks that is close. Bush is better then Walker. Stop trying to say otherwise, it's not close. Really.

No, none of that is true. You're only saying that because you are hopelessly biased as a Bears fan. I hate both teams equally(in reality I don't really hate either team). Most objective people say its pretty close, because it is. Forte is a better pass catcher and blocker, Gore is a better pure runner. Bush is a great 2nd back, probably second only to Ben Tate in the nfl, but Kendall Walker could be better than anyone we are talking about right now. He's very good for his short time in the nfl and what he's been asked to do.


And you're not hating on Forte/Bush because your a biased Packers fan?

I like Forte a lot. Ask RPB about when we disagreed last season about whether or not to pay Forte his money. I think i said on here at the time that the Bush signing was fantastic. I like watching both of those players a lot and wish they played for someone else. I believe our disagreement stems from you undervaluing Gore/Walker, not me undervaluing Forte/Bush.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Not necessarily disagreeing w/you, but isn't the running game a weak spot for you guys over the last few years? Why is that or is that your line's fault? Asking because I don't know. I hate the Packers and don't pay attention to them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I think Forte is an underrated runner. He's not flashy but he's shifty and effective. He hits the hole hard but is elusive.

Forte is a near 5 yrd/carry guy and Gore hasn't been that for quite a few years.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Spaulding wrote:
Not necessarily disagreeing w/you, but isn't the running game a weak spot for you guys over the last few years? Why is that or is that your line's fault? Asking because I don't know. I hate the Packers and don't pay attention to them.




It was between the Bears and the 49ers offense, not the Packers. If that was the case I would say the Packers have every advantage except RB.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 3715
Location: The Kingdom of Gene Siegel
It hasn't been good since about 2009. Grant was okay for a few years but was often injured. He missed the whole SB season. It's been a patchwork affair since then.

_________________
Back off, Warchild. Seriously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
OOOppp! Yeah. I'm on board now. Was thinking when did Gore join the Packers but then got lost in matchups and hating the packers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Spaulding wrote:
OOOppp! Yeah. I'm on board now. Was thinking when did Gore join the Packers but then got lost in matchups and hating the packers.




It's OK. I know shit gets foggy when you get that old. Right Spanky?

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
Not necessarily disagreeing w/you, but isn't the running game a weak spot for you guys over the last few years? Why is that or is that your line's fault? Asking because I don't know. I hate the Packers and don't pay attention to them.




It was between the Bears and the 49ers offense, not the Packers. If that was the case I would say the Packers have every advantage except RB.

Forte was a 5 ypc guy for one year. What was he before that? But again, I like Forte. I don't think he's underrated but he's a very good runner. I think both are special in the dime-a-dozen category of running back.

Gore has gone through more injuries than Forte has. They have limited him. He's extremely talented and has been for years, when healthy. I would think that's undeniable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Chris_in_joliet wrote:
It's OK. I know shit gets foggy when you get that old. Right Spanky?


I'm not drunk but I'm finishing some leftovers from yesterday. That doesn't help.

Keeping Score wrote:
It's definitely football season.


:P

I like Forte more than a lot of people. He's a huge part or has been a huge part of that offense, and a good player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I like Gore but he's 29 and 3 years older than Forte. Forte is reaching his prime. His ypc has gone up year after year and this year and next are probably his peak. Gore is on the downside.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Spaulding wrote:
Not necessarily disagreeing w/you, but isn't the running game a weak spot for you guys over the last few years? Why is that or is that your line's fault? Asking because I don't know. I hate the Packers and don't pay attention to them.

I think it's a few things. Unlike the Bears, the packers line is much worse at run blocking than pass blocking. I just assumed that was due to what each GM has been lookin for in relation to their offensive strategy. The other factor is that McCarthy seems to love the Andy Reid 70/30 pass/run game plan. Another factor is that GB hasn't seriously invested in an RB in awhile and their backs generally aren't very talented. Even Ahman Green was a Seattle castoff iirc. Many of us were pining for Marshaw Lynch a few years back, and I think we took Justin Harrell instead. RB may be easier to fill than any other position, but unless you devote resources to it, you won't end up with a playmaker. The Bears and Bengals both got rid of Benson because he was just a guy that wasn't a difference maker, and may have even been just bad. That's the guy we wanted to roll with. That's what happens when you don't committ any resources to a position.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I like Gore but he's 29 and 3 years older than Forte. Forte is reaching his prime. His ypc has gone up year after year and this year and next are probably his peak. Gore is on the downside.

First, I don't think Gore is near done. But more importantly to this discussion, all of that is irrelevant. I would much rather have Forte going forward. My point is that this season they are a wash. I might be wrong, but obviously I don't think I am. We'll see. Both were very impressive in Week 1 against bad defenses.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Forte hasn't really gone off rushing-wise against Packers. His best game was the 10-3 season finale going 15 rushes for 91 and 8 catches for 60 yards. Last year was the 9 rushes for 2 yards doozy albeit with 7 catches for 80 yards.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
FavreFan wrote:
I think it's a few things. Unlike the Bears, the packers line is much worse at run blocking than pass blocking. I just assumed that was due to what each GM has been lookin for in relation to their offensive strategy. The other factor is that McCarthy seems to love the Andy Reid 70/30 pass/run game plan. Another factor is that GB hasn't seriously invested in an RB in awhile and their backs generally aren't very talented. Even Ahman Green was a Seattle castoff iirc. Many of us were pining for Marshaw Lynch a few years back, and I think we took Justin Harrell instead. RB may be easier to fill than any other position, but unless you devote resources to it, you won't end up with a playmaker. The Bears and Bengals both got rid of Benson because he was just a guy that wasn't a difference maker, and may have even been just bad. That's the guy we wanted to roll with. That's what happens when you don't committ any resources to a position.



I'm not sure I'm there with you on RBs yet. How do you feel about Benson?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
FavreFan wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I like Gore but he's 29 and 3 years older than Forte. Forte is reaching his prime. His ypc has gone up year after year and this year and next are probably his peak. Gore is on the downside.

First, I don't think Gore is near done. But more importantly to this discussion, all of that is irrelevant. I would much rather have Forte going forward. My point is that this season they are a wash. I might be wrong, but obviously I don't think I am. We'll see. Both were very impressive in Week 1 against bad defenses.


You are betting on a 29 year-old renaissance year for Gore. It could happen. I don't think he's done but he's not elite any longer. Above-average for sure.

But, even for this year, I'd definitely take Forte. Forte was the most productive back in the League last year before he was injured. I don't see him dropping off just yet.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Spaulding wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think it's a few things. Unlike the Bears, the packers line is much worse at run blocking than pass blocking. I just assumed that was due to what each GM has been lookin for in relation to their offensive strategy. The other factor is that McCarthy seems to love the Andy Reid 70/30 pass/run game plan. Another factor is that GB hasn't seriously invested in an RB in awhile and their backs generally aren't very talented. Even Ahman Green was a Seattle castoff iirc. Many of us were pining for Marshaw Lynch a few years back, and I think we took Justin Harrell instead. RB may be easier to fill than any other position, but unless you devote resources to it, you won't end up with a playmaker. The Bears and Bengals both got rid of Benson because he was just a guy that wasn't a difference maker, and may have even been just bad. That's the guy we wanted to roll with. That's what happens when you don't committ any resources to a position.



I'm not sure I'm there with you on RBs yet. How do you feel about Benson?

Benson is garbage. I hate him. Everything about him. He can't catch or block, and he has below average speed. He's a weaker, smaller Brandon Jacobs. That sounds like the prototype for a shitty RB, and he is. No way Alex Green is worse than him. And yes, I'm factoring in that SF had by far the bed run defense in the nfl last year and brought back all 11 guys. I don't care, he still sucks. I guess he can still get you 100 yards on 28 carries against a bad team, but I'm pretty sure there's like 60 guys at least that fit that bill. It still pisses me off that they didn't go after Michael Bush. We get it TT, you like to draft because that's the smartest way to build a team. But once you build that team, FA is useful. To deny using it on principle alone would be like a coach refusing to use his challenges because he's old school and it goes against his beliefs. Refusing to even step foot in FA isn't old or new school, it's just fucking stupid.

Still love me some TT though. Hard to become a top 5 GM without utilizing FA. Imagine what he could do if he realized the offseason started before mid-April.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
:lol: We agree on something!

How do you feel about Thursday?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Spaulding wrote:
:lol: We agree on something!

How do you feel about Thursday?

I'm worried. I have a lot of respect for the Bears running game and I could be eating a lot of crow for the next 18-20 Sundays or so about Marshall and Cutler. But, I dont think Jennings is a very good cover corner yet, and I don't have much respect for the Bears defense overall without a fully healthy Urlacher. I hope we can outscore you guys. I think yesterday's game was more about how good SF is and not how bad GB is. But it takes a special kind of meatball to go into Thursday with any sort of confidence after what we saw yesterday. Im just an ordinary meatball, I have to draw the optimism line somewhere. I'm hoping for a Bad Jay game to make things easier.

How do you feel?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Image

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Worried. The defense will struggle w/o Url and Tillman. I hope for continued success on offense but think it could fall apart and look epically bad at any time. You never know what you have week to week with Lovie's teams. I feel better his little fingers are off the offense, no more his guys there, but it's still not like yours. It could be maybe...we do have a running game too. I'm used to losing in a way. We don't typically beat the good teams.

For some reason you guys seem like you are in panic mode though, and I don't understand why.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Spaulding wrote:
Worried. The defense will struggle w/o Url and Tillman. I hope for continued success on offense but think it could fall apart and look epically bad at any time. You never know what you have week to week with Lovie's teams. I feel better his little fingers are off the offense, no more his guys there, but it's still not like yours. It could be maybe...we do have a running game too. I'm used to losing in a way. We don't typically beat the good teams.

For some reason you guys seem like you are in panic mode though, and I don't understand why.

I don't get the sense the Pack are in panic mode, but I don't have a great pulse on the fan base up there. I'm quite certain the players and coaching staff aren't in panic mode. I refuse to ever go in panic mode, as evidenced by last years oft-repeated "I'm not worried about the defense" claim.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33819
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
You're a smart fan, like Bernstein. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Spaulding wrote:
You're a smart fan, like Bernstein. :P

That's the worst insult you've ever given me. :x

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57262
Spaulding wrote:
You're a smart fan, like Bernstein. :P


:lol:

BernsteinFan

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Keeping Score wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
Worried. The defense will struggle w/o Url and Tillman. I hope for continued success on offense but think it could fall apart and look epically bad at any time. You never know what you have week to week with Lovie's teams. I feel better his little fingers are off the offense, no more his guys there, but it's still not like yours. It could be maybe...we do have a running game too. I'm used to losing in a way. We don't typically beat the good teams.

For some reason you guys seem like you are in panic mode though, and I don't understand why.

I don't get the sense the Pack are in panic mode, but I don't have a great pulse on the fan base up there. I'm quite certain the players and coaching staff aren't in panic mode. I refuse to ever go in panic mode, as evidenced by last years oft-repeated "I'm not worried about the defense" claim.

I'm not in panic mode. I am in pissed off mode. It is very tiring to watch the mind boggling zine defense schemes capers comes up with. The same glaring weaknesses from last year were all present again. Morgan Burnett needs to be benched. He still has no idea what his and the other backs responsibilities are in coverage and his piss poor effort tackling us unnacceptable. That effort to tackle gore on the 3 yard line was sickening.

This crap clay and now jarret bush are talking about how the packers beat themselves against the giants and now 49ers is absurd and mm not correcting those statements is concerning. This team needs to understand that this is 2012 and they are as good as their record says they are. The super bowl win was a long time ago.

The Packer fan base is never in panic mode. At least in Wisconsin, we are huge meatballs and back them almost no matter what. We are extremely un-critical of almost anything (plays, coaches, players) and always feel things will get better etc......

Critical thinking is not a huge part of Wisconsin.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Keeping Score wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Spaulding wrote:
Worried. The defense will struggle w/o Url and Tillman. I hope for continued success on offense but think it could fall apart and look epically bad at any time. You never know what you have week to week with Lovie's teams. I feel better his little fingers are off the offense, no more his guys there, but it's still not like yours. It could be maybe...we do have a running game too. I'm used to losing in a way. We don't typically beat the good teams.

For some reason you guys seem like you are in panic mode though, and I don't understand why.

I don't get the sense the Pack are in panic mode, but I don't have a great pulse on the fan base up there. I'm quite certain the players and coaching staff aren't in panic mode. I refuse to ever go in panic mode, as evidenced by last years oft-repeated "I'm not worried about the defense" claim.



The Packer fan base is never in panic mode. At least in Wisconsin, we are huge meatballs and back them almost no matter what. We are extremely un-critical of almost anything (plays, coaches, players) and always feel things will get better etc......

Critical thinking is not a huge part of Wisconsin.


and Packer gear is considered Sunday best or wedding type clothing

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Keeping Score wrote:
The forecast is calling for 18 straight hours of rain in Green Bay, with it ending right around kickoff.

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group