It is currently Wed Nov 13, 2024 11:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23728
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
FavreFan wrote:
I agree with Danny Green and Gold. The statement boiled down to "What you saw last night is not actually what happened. Your eyes are lying to you."

Yeah, it doesn't pass the eye test.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
FavreFan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Yeah saw that.

Love the statement from the NFL.

I agree with Danny Green and Gold. The statement boiled down to "What you saw last night is not actually what happened. Your eyes are lying to you."


Mac is just pissed cause he lost $200.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Northside_Dan wrote:
My mind is doing the same thing Frank. Poorly written rule that will be addressed in the offseason
Awesome that both of these bad rule/good call situations have benefited the BEARS! :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
To have control you have to maintain control to the ground. Tate has his hands on the ball before they both go to the ground. This is different than if the Packers guy catches the ball and goes to the ground and then Tate gets his hands in there. When they hit the ground the Packers guy is squirming around. If he has complete control of the ball why is he not stationary?

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27515
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Yep

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Keeping Score wrote:
Jay Glazer ‏@JayGlazer
The league's statement says PI should've been called on Tate but result of the game is final


That's true, but it wouldn't be the first time that a referee has not called a penalty on the last play of a game.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33767
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Keeping Score wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Keeping Score wrote:
On a side note, UMN and I whittled down the Mini Ditka mystery last night to one of these three people:

Qbo, Spaulding, good dolphin.

We're leaning heavily towards Qbo at the moment.

Its none of those



Yes it is.


Pick me!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:47 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Is anyone really surprised that the result of the game won't be overturned? Goodell would have never taken that hit to his image.

It's a dumb rule that unfortunately goes against what everyone who saw the play "sees". As a fan of the sport, this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Mini Ditka wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.

How many fucking times are you going to type the same fucking thing, loose the god damn keyboard already. We get your fucking point!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Mini Ditka wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.

Image
Please, just stop. Just stop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Your picture just proves the correct call was made according to the way the rules are written.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
The picture shows that Tate has his hand on the ball. Because of the rule the intercepting team can't have the ball if Tate has his hand on the ball before the catch is completed when both players go to the ground. The Packers player must have 100 percent control of the ball. Tate is only required to have a portion of control over the ball.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:05 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Mini Ditka wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.


So by that logic, if an offensive player has a single hand on the ball while the defensive player has BOTH ARMS WRAPPED AROUND THE BALL and both players are in the endzone, it's a touchdown?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Your picture just proves the correct call was made according to the way the rules are written.

No where does it conclusively show a hand on the ball. It shows an arm around Jennings shoulder. Case closed. Pick. /thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:08 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Kirkwood wrote:
No where does it conclusively show a hand on the ball.
You need to look at your picture again. It shows a Tate's wrist and forearm on the ball.

TD. You lose. Ha. Ha. Ha.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Kirkwood wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.

Image
Please, just stop. Just stop.

/thread

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
Remember that Tate can gain control at any point during the play until the catch is completed. The Packers guy has to catch the ball and keep it all the way till he gets to the ground and completes the catch. Tate gets his hand in there before the catch is completed. It's not a catch if Tate has any form of a hand on the ball before the catch is completed. For the Packers to receive possession the Packers guy has to catch the ball and maintain complete control until he reaches the ground. In the event of both guys having hands on the ball the Seahawks keep the ball.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Mini Ditka wrote:
Remember that Tate can gain control at any point during the play until the catch is completed. The Packers guy has to catch the ball and keep it all the way till he gets to the ground and completes the catch. Tate gets his hand in there before the catch is completed. It's not a catch if Tate has any form of a hand on the ball before the catch is completed. For the Packers to receive possession the Packers guy has to catch the ball and maintain complete control until he reaches the ground. In the event of both guys having hands on the ball the Seahawks keep the ball.


And if that is the way the rule is meant to be understood, then it is a stupid rule saturated with gray.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
this rule needs to be overhauled to eliminate the grey area.


There was no gray area. The Packers guy has to maintain complete control as he goes to the ground. Tate got his hand in there before he went to the ground and he gained a portion of possession when both players reached the ground. For it to be an interception the Packers guy has to control the ball to the ground and can't let Tate get any portion of the ball. The Packers guy did not complete the catch and because of the tie going to the receiving team it's a touchdown.


So by that logic, if an offensive player has a single hand on the ball while the defensive player has BOTH ARMS WRAPPED AROUND THE BALL and both players are in the endzone, it's a touchdown?

Yes, that is what we are talking about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Correct. Rule, bad. Call, correct. Packers, last place; http://www.nfl.com/standings


And only now, /thread

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
putting all the drama aside, I would be concerned if I were a Packers fan right now about the way the team is playing

Yeah that is a concern. I like that McCarthy immediately acknowledged he took too long to adjust the gameplan to the defense. I don't like the fact that it took til halftime though. Something doesn't look good with Rodgers though. He's playing very tentatively. Very game-managerish.

Defense looks awesome though. Reloading through the draft looks like it has potential to pan out sooner rather than later.

I still think they look the best of the four North teams through 3 games.

Game one: Loss to SF with very little offense
Game Two: Get 4 Interceptions, Score two TDS
Game Three: 8 sacks before halftime


They havent played a solid game yet, have they?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
putting all the drama aside, I would be concerned if I were a Packers fan right now about the way the team is playing

Yeah that is a concern. I like that McCarthy immediately acknowledged he took too long to adjust the gameplan to the defense. I don't like the fact that it took til halftime though. Something doesn't look good with Rodgers though. He's playing very tentatively. Very game-managerish.

Defense looks awesome though. Reloading through the draft looks like it has potential to pan out sooner rather than later.

I still think they look the best of the four North teams through 3 games.

Game one: Loss to SF with very little offense
Game Two: Get 4 Interceptions, Score two TDS
Game Three: 8 sacks before halftime


They havent played a solid game yet, have they?

Nope. But like I said, they were playing 3 of the best defenses in the NFL. I'm concerned about it. I'm not in panic mode.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
putting all the drama aside, I would be concerned if I were a Packers fan right now about the way the team is playing

Yeah that is a concern. I like that McCarthy immediately acknowledged he took too long to adjust the gameplan to the defense. I don't like the fact that it took til halftime though. Something doesn't look good with Rodgers though. He's playing very tentatively. Very game-managerish.

Defense looks awesome though. Reloading through the draft looks like it has potential to pan out sooner rather than later.

I still think they look the best of the four North teams through 3 games.

Game one: Loss to SF with very little offense
Game Two: Get 4 Interceptions, Score two TDS
Game Three: 8 sacks before halftime


They havent played a solid game yet, have they?

Game two is the definition of "solid". But, no, they have not played up to the Packer standard. Luckily, three games don't make a season and the offense has a history of success.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I see.

I guess its like CGS said

Its good that its the O struggling, and not the D, because you have more confidence in the O getting it together


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Kirkwood wrote:
Game two is the definition of "solid".

Disagree. Should have blown em out with all the Turnovers and miscues of the Bears.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Game two is the definition of "solid".

Disagree. Should have blown em out with all the Turnovers and miscues of the Bears.

I was assuming you were only discussing the offense here. If you are taking into account entire team performance, I agree Game 2 was solid. The defense played outstanding. The defense played very well last night too, but Seattle is limited in what they can do offensively and it took the coaching staff far too long to start using the running game to counteract those pass rushers.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Portion of arm on top of the ball is contact, not control. Unless velcro or maple syrup is involved.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Furious Styles wrote:
Portion of arm on top of the ball is contact, not control. Unless velcro or maple syrup is involved.

Agreed. I think most people see that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Furious Styles wrote:
Portion of arm on top of the ball is contact, not control. Unless velcro or maple syrup is involved.

Agreed. I think most people see that.

That is not what the rule book states though

If you are going by common sense, yes. NFL rulebook, no.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group