It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 10:52 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 351 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:22 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Northside_Dan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't disagree with you guys that Trout deserves it, but aren't you basically making a case that all of these awards should simply go to whoever has the highest score on the advanced metrics that have been created?

Why not just cancel all voting on all awards?


I'd make the argument taking any 'advanced' stats out of it. Show me basic stats and eye test and I'd vote for Trout. Gold Glove caliber defense, amazing baserunner and slightly less accomplished hitting season Cabrera.

If Hamilton had 2 more homeruns we wouldn't be having this discussion


So, in September, when you watched Cabrera put the Tigers on his back and pretty much carry them to the playoffs overtaking the White Sox while Trout floundered horribly and the Angels choked their way out of the playoffs you were thinking that Trout passed the eye test for most valuable?

Without Cabrera, no way the Tigers make the playoffs. Without Trout, the Angels still would have come in 3rd place in their division.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Yes, because I watched the previous 5 months of the baseball season as well.

Even with Cabrera having the year he had, the Tigers were trailing an overachieving White Sox team in an absolutely terrible division for the vast majority of the season. Meanwhile, Trout was keeping the Angels competitive and within playoff striking distance in a difficult AL West.

Sure Cabrera had a better hitting stat line in September which allowed to him to have a better hitting season than Trout. With Trout, when the bats not working, he was still getting on base via walks and playing gold glove defense. When Cabrera isn't hitting, he's worthless.

One last point, Trout achieved his numbers, the 2nd better hitter in the AL, in 22 less games.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:31 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Northside_Dan wrote:
Yes, because I watched the previous 5 months of the baseball season as well.

Even with Cabrera having the year he had, the Tigers were trailing an overachieving White Sox team in an absolutely terrible division for the vast majority of the season. Meanwhile, Trout was keeping the Angels competitive and within playoff striking distance in a difficult AL West.

Sure Cabrera had a better hitting stat line in September which allowed to him to have a better hitting season than Trout. With Trout, when the bats not working, he was still getting on base via walks and playing gold glove defense. When Cabrera isn't hitting, he's worthless.

One last point, Trout achieved his numbers, the 2nd better hitter in the AL, in 22 less games.


Trout achieved his numbers through July. He was pretty average after the trade deadline. He was the MVP of the 1st half. Cabrera was MVP of the 2nd half. And because the 2nd half is clutch time, Cabrera wins the season award.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Northside_Dan wrote:
Yes, because I watched the previous 5 months of the baseball season as well.

Even with Cabrera having the year he had, the Tigers were trailing an overachieving White Sox team in an absolutely terrible division for the vast majority of the season. Meanwhile, Trout was keeping the Angels competitive and within playoff striking distance in a difficult AL West.

Sure Cabrera had a better hitting stat line in September which allowed to him to have a better hitting season than Trout. With Trout, when the bats not working, he was still getting on base via walks and playing gold glove defense. When Cabrera isn't hitting, he's worthless.

One last point, Trout achieved his numbers, the 2nd better hitter in the AL, in 22 less games.

You buried the lead, IMO. If Trout started Opening Day this is also a non-discussion and the Angels are a playoff team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The point is, whatever he did, he didn't help his team win enough to get to the postseason. So who gives a shit. He didn't put up good enough numbers to overcome his team not winning its division or the wild card.


Angels had a better record playing in a tougher division. So what else you got?


They didn't even get one of the two wild cards. Plus, when they needed to win in September, Trout sucked.

Trout hit .289/.400/.500 in September. :lol:

Plus the Angels had the best record in baseball since Trout arrived. HE SHOULD HAVE HELPED THE TEAM WIN MORE WHEN HE WASN'T PLAYING FOR THEM!!! :roll:


Last edited by Keyser Soze on Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Keyser Soze wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The point is, whatever he did, he didn't help his team win enough to get to the postseason. So who gives a shit. He didn't put up good enough numbers to overcome his team not winning its division or the wild card.


Angels had a better record playing in a tougher division. So what else you got?


They didn't even get one of the two wild cards. Plus, when they needed to win in September, Trout sucked.

Trout hit .289/.400/.500 in Septemeber. :lol:


And the second half is clutch time. Don't forget that :lol:

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:32 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Keyser Soze wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The point is, whatever he did, he didn't help his team win enough to get to the postseason. So who gives a shit. He didn't put up good enough numbers to overcome his team not winning its division or the wild card.


Angels had a better record playing in a tougher division. So what else you got?


They didn't even get one of the two wild cards. Plus, when they needed to win in September, Trout sucked.

Trout hit .289/.400/.500 in September. :lol:

Plus the Angels had the best record in baseball since Trout arrived. HE SHOULD HAVE HELPED THE TEAM WIN MORE WHEN HE WASN'T PLAYING FOR THEM!!! :roll:


Trout hit .257 in September with 6 RBI.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
http://www.baseball-reference.com/playe ... r=2012&t=b


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:43 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Keyser Soze wrote:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=troutmi01&year=2012&t=b



http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/gamelog/_/id/30836/mike-trout


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?id=troutmi01&year=2012&t=b



http://espn.go.com/mlb/player/gamelog/_/id/30836/mike-trout

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Somebody's lying

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:

Angels had a better record playing in a tougher division. So what else you got?


They didn't even get one of the two wild cards. Plus, when they needed to win in September, Trout sucked.

Trout hit .289/.400/.500 in September. :lol:

Plus the Angels had the best record in baseball since Trout arrived. HE SHOULD HAVE HELPED THE TEAM WIN MORE WHEN HE WASN'T PLAYING FOR THEM!!! :roll:


Trout hit .257 in September with 6 RBI.


Referencing RBI for a leadoff hitter. Nice work, moron.

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:00 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
redskingreg wrote:

Referencing RBI for a leadoff hitter. Nice work, moron.



So, it's okay to mention his RBI and HR's with respect to the MVP award, but not when you are examining him sucking ass down the stretch because he was a lead off hitter?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Would you use ERA as a factor in determining the best reliever of the season?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79585
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't disagree with you guys that Trout deserves it, but aren't you basically making a case that all of these awards should simply go to whoever has the highest score on the advanced metrics that have been created?

Why not just cancel all voting on all awards?


One could make a case for that.



But it would be a poor case. There are far too many variables and there isn't some tidy little number that authoritatively declares one player better than another.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
Baseball-reference added in the final 3 games in October where he hit .538/.571/.846 but those games don't matter in this arbitrary he sucked argument.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
You have to factor in everything related to batting / offense.
So there is no comparison then. Miggy wins.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
:lol: :lol:

Lots of real bad in here.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Would you use ERA as a factor in determining the best reliever of the season?

Your analogy is a failure.

We're not comparing leadoff hitters, or middle of the order hitters.

We are comparing players for the most valuable player award (usually batter). You have to factor in everything related to batting / offense.


That's as silly as using offensive numbers to determine Gold Glove winners.

The Silver Slugger is for purely batting. MVP should be for all-around play.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
Let us sum it up very simply.

In September, Mike Trout had his worst month of the season. In September, the Angels had their best month of the season.

That is all that needs to be said.

So this is MVP of September then?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.

If it was an inning in a game and each team had a number of runs, I know which one I'd want on my team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 12:13 pm
Posts: 15062
pizza_Place: Four hours away....and on fire :-(
FavreFan wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Let us sum it up very simply.

In September, Mike Trout had his worst month of the season. In September, the Angels had their best month of the season.

That is all that needs to be said.

So this is MVP of September then?


Remember these?

Image

_________________
-- source


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:14 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79585
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.



Exactly. And I'm not going to worry about the tiny percentage of a chance that a ball might be hit in that very small area of the outfield where Trout can get the ball and an average outfielder cannot. I'll take my chances.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.


Your team will be in less of these situations with the amount of runs he's saving with his defense. But it's fun to pick and chose scenarios that aid your point.

What if your team HAD to steal 2nd base so a base hit would tie the game. I know who I'd want.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79585
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Northside_Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.


Your team will be in less of these situations with the amount of runs he's saving with his defense. But it's fun to pick and chose scenarios that aid your point.

What if your team HAD to steal 2nd base so a base hit would tie the game. I know who I'd want.



How many runs do you think he's saving with his defense?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:18 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Northside_Dan wrote:
What if your team HAD to steal 2nd base so a base hit would tie the game. I know who I'd want.
Not even Mike Trout can steal 1st base.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Northside_Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I look at it like this. If I've got a one-run lead with two outs and the bases loaded, I know which of those two I'd prefer to face.

But if you had a 2 run lead in the 9th, I know which one would get replaced defensively.
If you are down 2 runs in the 9th with a runner on first, I know which one I would rather have at the plate.


Your team will be in less of these situations with the amount of runs he's saving with his defense. But it's fun to pick and chose scenarios that aid your point.

What if your team HAD to steal 2nd base so a base hit would tie the game. I know who I'd want.

The scenario thing is stupid anyways. If you did it like that with other sports, Tom Brady would have about 8 MVPs already, Jordan would have over 10, Kobe would have 3-4, Carmelo would have 2-3, and LeBron probably wouldn't have any.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Let us sum it up very simply.

In September, Mike Trout had his worst month of the season. In September, the Angels had their best month of the season.

That is all that needs to be said.

So this is MVP of September then?

The Angels do not go as Mike Trout goes.

That means he is simply not as valuable to his team as Cabrera is to his own respective team. The Angels can win without Trout.


Angels had a better record with Trout in the starting lineup (80-58, .580) than the Tigers did with Cabrera in theirs (87-74, .540).

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
Good stat. Except the September comparison I've already presented shows that in all likelihood the Angels were slumping to begin the season and that they would have picked up the pace whether or not Trout was called up, or performed well.

So a 1 month sample size now is more valid than a 5 month sample size?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Mike Trout's mere presence lifted them out of their slump.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 351 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group