That's not what the disclaimer says.

I hate facts.

I was paid to stop doing the CSFMB Wikipedia thread.

oh comeon dude.... you know any decent corporation worth a lick has their IT dept routinely go through and "spruce up" their page/s.... and how many times have you read a wiki on some obscure actor/producer/writer/author/etc that's incredibly fleshed out and descriptive to the point where it's like ["gee, i wonder what DEVOTED FAN wrote this one...."

oh comeon dude.... you know any decent corporation worth a lick has their IT dept routinely go through and "spruce up" their page/s.... and how many times have you read a wiki on some obscure actor/producer/writer/author/etc that's incredibly fleshed out and descriptive to the point where it's like "gee, i wonder what DEVOTED FAN wrote this one...."

The simple fact that IMU is editing Wiki pages is reason enough not to rely upon them for truth and accuracy.

if wiki's non-prophet and SOOOOO IMPORTANT that it has to transcend the bernsteinesque sponsors-are-off-limits policy.... then like, comeon... this should be subsidized by teh UN or something as an important consortium of collected human knowledge or something..... not an overglorified sanctimonious subvertively-brilliant website that's permanently got a couple'a meaty fingers up google's twat whenever you search something in the hopes of secretly/subtly revising human history over the long term..... colbert covered it awhile back when the w(/)rd was "wikiality"

* twilight zone theme broadcast directly to my tinfoil hat *