It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Go to NFL.com and view the rankings and you will see them listed as I posted them here.

immessedup17 wrote:
NFL.com has a writer with personal opinions like like every other writer on every other website. Their list isn't any more "official" than the list I found.

immessedup17 wrote:
The only Week 17 ones I can find show him at 25th out of the 32 starting QB's for Week 17.
:scratch:

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Freeman had a 5-6 game stretch where he was terriffic. About as good as anyone in the league. But early and especially late in the season, he was mostly awful. Bradford is not consistent either. He has some good games and just about as many bad games. Tannehill is probably ranked a bit high, but I have more issue with where Rivers is ranked (too high). Also not really in step with Rothlisberger and Eli Manning being ranked along with Ryan and Brees. Brees belongs in the Top Tier. But the fact that Ponder is ranked in the bottom catagory is not something I have issue with. Do you?

First off, you admitted you think there are several flaws in the list. I see many also. Therefore, it's not really something you should cite as credible or official just because they happened to get one you think is correct.

I dont think Ponder is a good QB right now. He is probably below average. He also had some similar problems to guys like Cutler, Freeman, Bradford, Fitzpatrick, etc, and that problem is consistency. Freeman started playing poorly when he lost his top two linemen for the season. Cutler has problems when guys get hurt around him. Ditto for Ponder with Harvin - he had a stretch in the middle of this season that he was just awful, had something like 300 passing yards combined in 3 games and like a 50 QB rating. But he rebounded and played well down the stretch against pretty good teams. These are QBs who need everything around them in place and then they can perform at above average levels. I think Ponder's ceiling is what Alex Smith has done the past year and a half. I agree with IMU that he can be good, but probably not great. He's still in his second season so I think he will get better. He was awful last year, and he was noticeably better this year, which is a good sign. So yeah, I think it's fair to categorize him as a bottom 8 or 10 QB, but he's at the top of that list right now and closer to average than Sanchez-level terrible. And he should get better. A lot of those guys ahead of him like Fitzpatrick, Cutler, Palmer, Rivers, etc will not get better.

Also, I dont think Brees is on the top level. I think he's a clear cut 4th best QB in the league, but I think Brady, Rodgers, and Manning are clearly better than the rest of the league.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Dempster got slapped around against good teams in the a.l....records mean little...I look at era..whip and I.p....I am looking forward to him getting raped in the a.l. east this year.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:45 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Please do tell where you "found" your list. I would love to go search out the list you say has Ponder listed significantly higher.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1460 ... r-rankings

25th, as I said.


Didn't you originally say that the prevailing opinion of Ponder holds that he isn't bad?

To support this view, you are linking to a webpage that contradicts your thesis. That's probably not a good idea.

Here's the bleacherreport.com analysis of Ponder and his ranking of 25 (of 32):

Quote:
Christian Ponder's lack of production this season was overshadowed by the play of Adrian Peterson. His inability to produce explosive plays through the air really limited the effectiveness of the Minnesota Vikings offense.

Ponder had nine games where he failed to reach 200 yards passing, and in three of those games, he failed to throw for more than 100 yards. Those numbers are hard to believe for a quarterback who plays for a winning team.

The biggest issue facing Ponder is his inability to make plays down the field. These issues are twofold, as he isn't comfortable stretching the field and he also lacks the long accuracy to complete a high percentage of those throws.


Does this sound like an endorsement of Ponder to you?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 3:13 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
immessedup17 wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Didn't you originally say that the prevailing opinion of Ponder holds that he isn't bad?


I said he is average. Because you've refused to read all of my posts in this thread, I could see where you are getting confused. This is your own fault, but I'll be kind. Those rankings are for the 32 quarterbacks that started Week 17. It does not count the many other quarterbacks who have started in 2012. Ponder would be ranked higher than those quarterbacks, I'd assure you. 39 QB's started 4 games or more in the NFL this year.

And again, I cite the ranking of Jay Cutler, and point out that he and Ponder share the same stats while Jay Cutler had Marshall all year, and Ponder did not have such a potent weapon.

I will post correct power rankings.


1)Your initial post in this thread states that you disagree with Steve's assessment that Ponder is bad and that you "hadn't heard that at all." You then linked to a ranking that indicates exactly the opposite of your original contention.

2)The heading for the rankings you posted is "Final Regular Season NFL QB Power Rankings." The rankings encompass the entire season, not Week 17 alone. You apparently are unable to comprehend the meaning of the sources you cite to support your arguments.

3)Does it really matter that Ponder is better than all of the Cardinals 4 quarterbacks? Will any of them be starters in the NFL next year?

4)A QB ranking of 25 in a league that has 32 starters is not average. It is well below average.

5)I am not sure why you are making the Cutler comparison in responding to me. I am on the record as stating that he should be replaced as the Bears QB.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Posting a ranking of Ponder that empasizes that he threw for under 200 yards in 9 games and under 100 in 3 and he showed an inability to produce explosive plays in a one dimensional offense is hardly gonna support your argument. It reinforced my position that he belongs in the "Bottom of the Barrel" catagory of QB's. Thanks for supporting my position on the subject. :lol:

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Posting a ranking of Ponder that empasizes that he threw for under 200 yards in 9 games and under 100 in 3 and he showed an inability to produce explosive plays in a one dimensional offense is hardly gonna support your argument. It reinforced my position that he belongs in the "Bottom of the Barrel" catagory of QB's. Thanks for supporting my position on the subject. :lol:


Almost 63% of passes completed? Low number of attempts = low yardage.

Ponder has the 21st most attempts through 17 weeks (ESPN provides 40 entries). So you're partially correct. But he's also 31st out of 32 in yards per attempt. That's WITH Percy Harvin having the 3rd most YAC this year. His completion percentage is more a function of his conservative check-down throws. A receiver who can blow the top off the D I guess is needed to fully evaluate Ponder's potential. But FavreFan is probably right his peak is Alex Smith if everything breaks 100% right for him.

Used ESPN's sortable stats table.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/passing/sort/yardsPerPassAttempt


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23862
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
immessedup17 wrote:
Almost 63% of passes completed? Low number of attempts = low yardage.

Or he's terrible throwing the ball deep, or even medium distances. No QB has a higher % of his total yardage as YAC. The Vikings (Peterson) do a good job of masking his inadequacies.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65804
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
immessedup17 wrote:
**10-20 CSFMB members who are known to have primarily intelligent sports thoughts.

Well I'm out.

Ponder's arrow is pointing up. Cutler's is kinda teetering on level.
Part of this is that no one expected Ponder to be worth a damn and everyone here thought that Cutler was the Prophet.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 6:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Ponder is out. Pussy. Let's see how MJD has to say about this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Oh, and Cutlers QB rating 81.3. Ponders QB rating 81.2. The stats overall are nearly identical. IMU-as a Viking fan your opinion on Ponder must be biased. Nobody outside Vikings fans consider Ponder a good QB. He's right at the top of the list for QB's likely to be replaced in 2013, along with Sanchez, Gabbert/Henne, and Jake Locker.

One can be a fan and still be unbiased. It is called being an intelligent fan.

He is in his second year. No, he is not at the top of the list of QB's being replaced. He is the QB of a playoff team. A QB that never hurts his offense. He is a dependable game manager on a run-based team.

If I was crazy in this opinion, I'd have 10-20 CSFMB members calling me on it.


It is a crazy opinion and if you were not debating ME on the subject many would have called you on it. Of all the QB's rated prior to the season, only Jake Locker and Blaine Gabbert were rated lower. Kevin Kolb Ryan Fitzpatrick, Sam Bradford and Matt Cassel were all rated higher. he's a QB of a playoff team because he plays with the greatest RB in the league. He's a passenger on this cruise, not the Captain. I give him credit for a good game last week against the Packers, but I'll bet he doesn't have a similar effort this weekend in Green Bay. He'll revert to being a lousy game manager, incapable of making plays when needed. Packers 27-13.



Okay, so I gave each team 3 points too many.....Some people hate to say I told you so..I'm not one of those people. :wink:

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 05, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Ponder was getting booed by Viking fans most of the season. The team improved and so did he towards the end of the season. He made some nice throws against the Pack in game 16. He looks like maybe another Alex Smith in the making at best.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Keeping Score wrote:
Not sure on the Cutler/Ponder thing, but I do believe Cutler > Webb.


:lol: Marginally. :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23862
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
immessedup17 wrote:
All QB's do this. I guarantee every single NFL quarterback has overthrown or underthrown a wide-open target this season.

62% completion rate.


Image

If you threw for the fewest yards in the air in the NFL you better have a decent completion %.

No QB threw the ball away less than Jay Cutler did this season and Jay had zero spikes. A model of efficiency. Go Bears!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group