It is currently Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:48 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Bio on NFL network this morning. Always just great new info.

-Ditka DUI after the Dallas game, on 294 North. Ditka says he was swearing at the cop, while being bent over the hood and handcuffed....but the best is the camera then cutting to McMahon saying he was driving by right when the cops cuffed him...Honked and waived.

-Outtakes of the interview, Ditka calling the camera guy 'Cesil B DeMills", with a "Lets go...it's an interview, not an epic"

-V. Dallas when up 28-0 Ditka wanted to stop the blitzing because it was Lamdry, his mentor, he asked Buddy to stop blitzing and Buddy gave him a "Fuck you, I handle the defense!"

Could watch a 5 hour movie on them!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40834
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
lol I would love to have been around just to watch the stuff Ditka and Buddy said to each other all year.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
That could be 2 hours worth.

"never felt so helpless in a football game" Joe Montana after getting sacked 7 times v The Beloved.

Reminded me of Grogan saying it was the first time since he played pee wee that he was scared. That as from the Super Bowl.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
ah, the youngsters don't realize how dominant they were and how much fucking fun the personalities were.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38909
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Still the greatest single season team ever. Fuck the 72 Dolphins, fuck the Double-O Ravens.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


Nonsense.

They didn't have to play against big black studs!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


Nonsense.

They didn't have to play against big black studs!

Leave your sexual preference out of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


Agree.

The Bulls had an amazing national appeal and the 72-10 was great, but the Bear that year were complete bad asses!

ESPN ran a poll a few years back as to what was the best Super Bowl winning team and the Bear got 40% of the vote out of 5 options.

WOOF WOOF

Also, top Chicago Sports Moment, Fridge and Wilbur running back the fumble as the snow came down. That was pretty intense!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16692
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Agreed on the dominance...but I always wonder what would've happened if the Bears had to face the Dolphins again in the Super Bowl.

Didn't they film the Super Bowl shuffle right after that loss? Ballsy!

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
bigfan wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


Agree.

The Bulls had an amazing national appeal and the 72-10 was great, but the Bear that year were complete bad asses!

ESPN ran a poll a few years back as to what was the best Super Bowl winning team and the Bear got 40% of the vote out of 5 options.

WOOF WOOF

Also, top Chicago Sports Moment, Fridge and Wilbur running back the fumble as the snow came down. That was pretty intense!

What if the 85 Bears had to play the 72-10 Bulls team? Wow, somebody would've been fucked!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 2:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


I always felt the 1992 Bulls were better than the 1996 Bulls. Jordan was at his absolute apex in 92's, Pippen was also more dynamic that year as well. You also had the underrated Grant and solid core of Cartwright/Scott Williams/perdue at center, much better than Longley. I also liked the shooting they had with Armstrong and Paxson. Most of it however revolves around MJ. I wouldn't take any player ever over the 29 year old 1992 version, I think he's considerably better than the 96' version.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80246
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Powerhouse233 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


I always felt the 1992 Bulls were better than the 1996 Bulls. Jordan was at his absolute apex in 92's, Pippen was also more dynamic that year as well. You also had the underrated Grant and solid core of Cartwright/Scott Williams/perdue at center, much better than Longley. I also liked the shooting they had with Armstrong and Paxson. Most of it however revolves around MJ. I wouldn't take any player ever over the 29 year old 1992 version, I think he's considerably better than the 96' version.


You'll probably get an argument on that from most of the average fans, but among basketball insiders and those who really know the game, the teams from the first threepeat are considered stronger than those from the second.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


I always felt the 1992 Bulls were better than the 1996 Bulls. Jordan was at his absolute apex in 92's, Pippen was also more dynamic that year as well. You also had the underrated Grant and solid core of Cartwright/Scott Williams/perdue at center, much better than Longley. I also liked the shooting they had with Armstrong and Paxson. Most of it however revolves around MJ. I wouldn't take any player ever over the 29 year old 1992 version, I think he's considerably better than the 96' version.


You'll probably get an argument on that from most of the average fans, but among basketball insiders and those who really know the game, the teams from the first threepeat are considered stronger than those from the second.


I believe Dan Bernstein shares the above view. You will undoubtedly want to immediately reconsider your stated position. :wink:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:42 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80246
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
Most dominant team we've ever had in Chicago, including the 72 win Bulls.


I always felt the 1992 Bulls were better than the 1996 Bulls. Jordan was at his absolute apex in 92's, Pippen was also more dynamic that year as well. You also had the underrated Grant and solid core of Cartwright/Scott Williams/perdue at center, much better than Longley. I also liked the shooting they had with Armstrong and Paxson. Most of it however revolves around MJ. I wouldn't take any player ever over the 29 year old 1992 version, I think he's considerably better than the 96' version.


You'll probably get an argument on that from most of the average fans, but among basketball insiders and those who really know the game, the teams from the first threepeat are considered stronger than those from the second.


I believe Dan Bernstein shares the above view. You will undoubtedly want to immediately reconsider your stated position. :wink:


:lol: bernstein isn't always wrong, you know.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Im not sure I agree with NBA insiders

Also, its not like you can only compare 3 vs. 3

The 72 win team was probably better than the team that beat the Lakers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57618
If you are looking at the first 3 years vs. the 2nd 3 years as a whole then no doubt the first 3 year run was better. But for an individual season, the 72 win team was by far the best IMO.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
RFDC wrote:
If you are looking at the first 3 years vs. the 2nd 3 years as a whole then no doubt the first 3 year run was better. But for an individual season, the 72 win team was by far the best IMO.


I disagree. The 92' team had MJ at his absolute best, better bigs, an even more dynamic Pippen, and awesome shooters in Paxson and Armstrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57618
Powerhouse233 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
If you are looking at the first 3 years vs. the 2nd 3 years as a whole then no doubt the first 3 year run was better. But for an individual season, the 72 win team was by far the best IMO.


I disagree. The 92' team had MJ at his absolute best, better bigs, an even more dynamic Pippen, and awesome shooters in Paxson and Armstrong.


MJ was athletically at the top of his game in 92, but he was a more complete basketball player in the 72 win season. The Bigs are a wash. Rodman is better than Grant. Cartwright better than Luc. Pippen is the real place I disagree with you. Pippen was a much better player in the 2nd run. He was good in the first run, he was great in the 2nd. The 2nd run had great shooters too. Steve Kerr...

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Agreed on the dominance...but I always wonder what would've happened if the Bears had to face the Dolphins again in the Super Bowl.

Didn't they film the Super Bowl shuffle right after that loss? Ballsy!


Super Bowl Shuffle took close to 2 months to start and finish. Notice all the guys super imposed in...and 99% of the singing done by one guy "FRENCHY"...he sings in a local wedding band these days.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80246
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
RFDC wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
If you are looking at the first 3 years vs. the 2nd 3 years as a whole then no doubt the first 3 year run was better. But for an individual season, the 72 win team was by far the best IMO.


I disagree. The 92' team had MJ at his absolute best, better bigs, an even more dynamic Pippen, and awesome shooters in Paxson and Armstrong.


MJ was athletically at the top of his game in 92, but he was a more complete basketball player in the 72 win season. The Bigs are a wash. Rodman is better than Grant. Cartwright better than Luc. Pippen is the real place I disagree with you. Pippen was a much better player in the 2nd run. He was good in the first run, he was great in the 2nd. The 2nd run had great shooters too. Steve Kerr...



I don't think he was a "more complete" player during the second run. Jordan had two distinct careers- the first as one of the most dynamic high-flyers the game has ever seen and the other as a damn good mid-range jump shooter. The one constant was his defense, although later in his career teams figured out that if you could force him into matching up with a quick little guy, he had problems. During the second threepeat I would compare Jordan's offensive game to Rip Hamilton's. That certainly isn't why Jordan is remembered as "the best that ever was, the best that ever will be."

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:36 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
11-1 in the 2005 playoffs is one of the most dominant runs ever.

So. Chew on that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43791
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
During the second threepeat I would compare Jordan's offensive game to Rip Hamilton's.

If that Rip Hamilton would show up, this current Bulls team would be something.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43791
Frank Coztansa wrote:
11-1 in the 2005 playoffs is one of the most dominant runs ever.

So. Chew on that.

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80246
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Douchebag wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
During the second threepeat I would compare Jordan's offensive game to Rip Hamilton's.

If that Rip Hamilton would show up, this current Bulls team would be something.



The problem is, Rip Hamilton has also had two distinct careers- one as a great mid-range jump shooter and the other on the inactive list.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
RFDC wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
If you are looking at the first 3 years vs. the 2nd 3 years as a whole then no doubt the first 3 year run was better. But for an individual season, the 72 win team was by far the best IMO.


I disagree. The 92' team had MJ at his absolute best, better bigs, an even more dynamic Pippen, and awesome shooters in Paxson and Armstrong.


MJ was athletically at the top of his game in 92, but he was a more complete basketball player in the 72 win season. The Bigs are a wash. Rodman is better than Grant. Cartwright better than Luc. Pippen is the real place I disagree with you. Pippen was a much better player in the 2nd run. He was good in the first run, he was great in the 2nd. The 2nd run had great shooters too. Steve Kerr...


Jordan was as complete as ever in 1992. It was the peak of peaks, the absolute apex of his career. It was the perfect combination of athleticism, mind, and skill. He still had the incredible athleticism, his shot was beautiful and he could destroy his opponents very easily. The bigs are not a wash. The 92' team had three bigs who were big and could defend and rebound. Williams, Cartwright, and Perdue were all as good as Longley. Longley was ok, but he couldn't move his feet, Wennington was just a big body with a decent shot. 92' Pippen was also a better athlete and had an incredible year, as good as 96'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
This team will never die. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57618
I am just going to ignore the fact that MJ was compared in this thread to Rip.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43791
RFDC wrote:
I am just going to ignore the fact that MJ was compared in this thread to Rip.

Yeah. Rip in his prime was probably just as good as Wizards era Jordan.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 85 Bears
PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
Kirkwood wrote:
This team will never die. :lol:


The 05' White Sox should be revered in a similar fashion. A 99 win team that absolutely obliterated every team in the playoffs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group