It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:38 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38358
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Psycory wrote:
The only offense I took was that it wasn't that good of a joke.



I agree. If you're going to call a nine year old a Caller Bob, you should make sure that it's damn funny.

Someone made the decision to tweet that shit. They had to know that it was going to be really controversial. What offends me is that they were unwilling to own it. Fuck you. You said it. Stand by that shit.



The person that posted it it, stood by it.

The CEO of The Onion did not want to standing next to the poster, on his site, while they "owned" it.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 12:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79563
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Seacrest wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Psycory wrote:
The only offense I took was that it wasn't that good of a joke.



I agree. If you're going to call a nine year old a Caller Bob, you should make sure that it's damn funny.

Someone made the decision to tweet that shit. They had to know that it was going to be really controversial. What offends me is that they were unwilling to own it. Fuck you. You said it. Stand by that shit.



The person that posted it it, stood by it.

The CEO of The Onion did not want to standing next to the poster, on his site, while they "owned" it.



Well, fuck the CEO then. That's even more offensive. He should make sure about who the fuck is putting out content under his masthead and that he supports what they have to say. Is the CEO of The Onion Pat Fitzgerald?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:04 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38358
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
The CEO is a gent named Steve Hannah.

Btw, sorry about the Clint Boyer misstatement yesterday.

If you don't like H&R because of that, feel free to turn on Douche Levine.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
The CEO is a gent named Steve Hannah.

Btw, sorry about the Clint Boyer misstatement yesterday.

If you don't like H&R because of that, feel free to turn on Douche Levine.


:lol:

I love Seacrest.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Columbine Jocks Safely Resume Bullying


LITTLETON, CO—On April 20, when two students at Columbine High School opened fire in a brutal shooting spree that left 12 classmates and a teacher dead, many feared that this affluent suburban school would never be the same.


Members of Columbine High School's popular crowd, who, more than four months after the tragic shooting at their school, have finally begun to exclude again.

But now, more than four months after a tragedy that shook the nation to its core and marked the most notorious incident of school violence in U.S. history, the atmosphere is optimistic. Slowly but surely, life at Columbine is returning to normal.

Thanks to stern new security measures, a militarized school environment and a massive public-relations effort designed to obscure all memory of the murderous event, members of Columbine's popular crowd are once again safe to reassert their social dominance and resume their proud, longstanding tradition of excluding those who do not fit in.

"We have begun the long road to healing," said varsity-football starting halfback Jason LeClaire, 18, a popular senior who on Aug. 16 returned to the school for the first time since the shooting. "We're bouncing back, more committed than ever to ostracizing those who are different."

Added LeClaire's girlfriend, cheerleader Kellie Nelson: "A school where the jocks cannot freely exclude math geeks, drama fags, goths and other inferiors without fearing for their lives is not the kind of school I want to go to."

The resilient attitude displayed by LeClaire and Nelson speaks volumes about Columbine administrators' deep commitment to making the school a safe place for members of the popular cliques. Last spring, the entire nation watched in horror on live television as terror-stricken students fled the school, running with their hands above their heads, flanked by SWAT teams. But when Columbine reopened its doors on Aug. 16, a spirit of boosterism, school pride and unquestioning conformity once again prevailed as the elite jock crowd "took back the school" as its own.

On Sept. 6, amid a pep-rally atmosphere of marching-band fanfare, cheerleaders and mass chanting, a group of jocks wearing T-shirts bearing the slogan, "We, Not You, Are Columbine" were escorted by armed guards into the school for the first day of the new semester. Approximately one hour later, the rest of the student body was allowed into the building through a side door.

"It's almost as if a helpful 'big brother' is watching us now," homecoming queen Lori Nowell said. "None of the losers can mess with us. Now that the entire school is blanketed by surveillance equipment, the popular kids, like, totally rule the school!"

"Its gonna be a great year!" best friend Jessica Wohlpert added with a high-five.

As the school year begins under the watchful eye of 24-hour electronic monitoring and police protection, a sense of normalcy has returned to Columbine. Just like at any other school, the computer geeks are mocked, the economically disadvantaged kids are barely acknowledged, and the chess-club, yearbook and debate-team members are universally reviled. While these traditions are nothing new, from now on they will be much easier to preserve, thanks to the high-tech, draconian security measures that now dominate Columbine life.

Prior to the April shootings, it was thought that Columbine's unpopular students were under control. After all, geeks like Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the "Trench Coat Mafia" members who committed the killings, had been persecuted for years as a matter of policy. But according to vice-principal Dr. Frederick Mondrian, the tragedy made Columbine administrators realize that not nearly enough had been done to enforce adherence to the school's dominant social pecking order.


An armed police officer stands guard over a group of Columbine
cheerleaders.

"We thought that the systematic cruelties inflicted on our school's desperate, alienated outcasts would be sufficient," Mondrian said. "Those kids were beaten up, pelted with rocks and universally rejected by their more popular peers, not only because they were smart and computer-literate, but also because of the way they dressed and the music they liked. But the shootings sent a clear message to this school and this community: We hadn't done nearly enough to keep such misfits shunned and in their place."

To rectify the problem, school authorities consulted with top ostracization experts and developed a comprehensive jock-safety plan. Cameras were installed on school grounds, enabling authorities to more closely monitor the activities of all students for suspiciously nonconformist behaviors or modes of dress. All entrances to the school are now locked and accessible only by intercom or specially coded key card, preventing the sort of open, comfortable learning environment that might encourage students to express themselves. The soothing presence of armed patrols, coupled with high fences surrounding the grounds, reassures jocks that they can feel free to once again torment the school's geeks as they did before April 20, without fear of reprisal.

In addition to these changes, school authorities have brought in special fashion consultants, who are lending their time and expertise to help educators identify "at-risk" clothing and hair. Students who are seen wearing "red-flag" items such as thick eyeliner, long coats, tattoos, Marilyn Manson T-shirts, non-designer jeans and the color black are now required to attend special makeover sessions with a trained psychiatric professional, who will assess the student's potential for nonconformist behavior and then outfit him or her in Tommy Hilfiger jeans, Gap T-shirts and Abercrombie & Fitch baseball caps with a curved brim, on penalty of expulsion.

Thus far, the beefed-up security measures have done wonders to restore the self-esteem of Columbine's jocks, who say they feel safer shunning, berating, belittling and picking on those who are different from themselves than ever before. And the jocks are doing their part to keep the untouchables in line, more than doubling the number of swirlies, noogies and wedgies doled out to Columbine's many outcasts since last year.

Happily, the many efforts to protect Columbine's jocks seem to be working. In fact, schools across the country have begun to pick up on the Columbine model, with many districts imposing measures even more stern than those at Columbine itself. These include mandatory dress codes, transparent book bags that are subject to random search, metal detectors, electronic handprint-identification systems and automatic expulsion of anyone who goes out of his or her way to "separate themselves socially" from classmates or "break the status quo."

Meanwhile, here at Columbine, the popular kids say they just want to get on with their privileged lives. As cheerleader Tammi Brandon put it at a recent pep rally, "Go Rebels!"

School authorities stressed that the remark merely referred to the name of the Columbine football team and was not intended to be taken literally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:12 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38358
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
The CEO is a gent named Steve Hannah.

Btw, sorry about the Clint Boyer misstatement yesterday.

If you don't like H&R because of that, feel free to turn on Douche Levine.


:lol:

I love Seacrest.



Thank you.

You, my wife and at least two of the kids. The list is growing.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Disagree.

Edgy, but funny. Either way, its comedy, if people are offended that's ok.


I hear what you are saying, I wonder if the parents have a lawsuit. I could see a valid argument that this had impact on future roles.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37838
Location: ...
this was pretty good, from EW.com.

Such a frank admission of remorse is unusual for The Onion, a publication that’s never shied away from controversial jokes or strong, vulgar language. In fact, this may be the first time the paper has actually apologized for something it’s written — even though plenty of its creations have stoked the public’s ire before. (We can’t say for sure whether The Onion has ever issued another apology, since the site hasn’t yet responded to EW’s inquiries.)

In 2011, The Onion drew criticism for posting a series of “breaking news” tweets about a supposed hostage situation in the U.S. Capitol, complete with witness accounts of “screaming and gunfire.” The tweets were linked to a fake news story about Congress members taking schoolchildren hostage — but several panicked Twitter users took them at face value, prompting the Capitol Police to tell reporters that there was no merit to The Onion’s story. When contacted by the Washington Post, the satirical site’s writers were unapologetic: “This is satire,” they said. “That’s how it works.”

The paper gave a similarly flippant response last year, when readers were enraged by an Onion News Network video that featured a 9/11-inspired image of a plane flying into Chicago’s Willis Tower. “9/11 must never be the fodder for jokes. Perhaps you didn’t see the news that humor died after 9/11,” Onion marketing director Grant Jones dryly told The Huffington Post. He also expressed mock surprise that “other major news sources are not giving [this story] the coverage it deserves.”

The Onion also chose not to apologize when Santa Rosa’s California Parenting Institute took issue with a story that credited the organization with releasing a fake study, even after the Institute felt moved to issue a press release stating that it had nothing to do with the article. “Generally people recognize The Onion and are familiar with what we do. However, there are certainly cases of confusion for those that have never heard of us,” Onion spokeswoman Anne Finn told the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, leaving the issue at that.

There seems to be just one other incident in Onion history that’s led to an apology — in 2008, a Canadian firefighter was upset to find that the paper had run a photo of him without his consent. “We feel really crummy about it and we apologize to the firefighter in question,” ex-Editorial Manager Chet Clem told the Ottawa Citizen, adding that the picture was a properly licensed shot from a photo service. Even here, though, the Onion wasn’t apologizing for its actual content.

What, then, made the Quvenzhané Wallis joke so different from every other offensive quip that’s been published by The Onion? Context seems to be the key. Although full-length stories and videos can flesh out a joke using narrative, a tweet’s 140-character limit makes that sort of development impossible. Whoever wrote that Wallis tweet may have been trying to comment on the way the media treats celebrities, or the difficulties child stars face, or even how Seth MacFarlane had sexualized Wallis with his joke about her and George Clooney. Unfortunately, there wasn’t enough space for any of those ideas to be conveyed fully in the tweet — leaving The Onion with a personal attack that did nothing but attempt to shock by calling a child an ugly word.

Unless a reader really reaches for it, the c-word tweet barely even contains a joke to begin with — which, from a comedy writer’s perspective, may be the worst thing about it. And that, in the end, is probably why it warrants The Onion’s first real apology.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
Image

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Douchebag wrote:
312player wrote:
Agree with DB on what? Its acceptable to target a kid today? Or last month when he said "kids are off limits"

Who is being attacked? It's fake news. No one is posting pictures of Bears coaches children, which was actually part of an actual news site.

If you are comparing the Onion to an actual news source, you're dumber than I thought.






This message board is hardly an actual news site.
I think jimmypasta posting a picture of a guys family n is commenting is not even comparable to calling a child a Cynthia...but what do I know.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Onion
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79563
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Douchebag wrote:
If you are comparing the Onion to an actual news source, you're dumber than I thought.



Of course not. I get my news from Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group