It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 11:32 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
bigfan wrote:
I thought we established this Learning thing is overrated! MBA's are basically not worth anything and it is a wonder anyone gets them! Whoever does is an idiot! Experience is all that matters! All thos kids should go get jobs today!

Are you familiar with the concept of "Return on Investment"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43573
bigfan wrote:
I thought we established this Learning thing is overrated! MBA's are basically not worth anything and it is a wonder anyone gets them! Whoever does is an idiot! Experience is all that matters! All thos kids should go get jobs today!

Ok. I know you probably aren't capable of understanding anything I wrote in that other thread, so I'll type it V-E-R-Y S-L-O-W-L-Y so you might understand better. You obviously didn't complete your MBA if you are having this kind of comprehension problem.

I never said an MBA is worthless, I just said that in cases where someone younger (Like Dan) has an MBA, it probably wouldn't give him any advantage versus someone with more experience. All of this is of course dependent on what field he is working, and what field he might want to go to. If he is going to start fresh somewhere in an entirely new industry, I don't think an MBA would do anything. If I got a resume of someone who had got their bachelor's degree 3 years ago, and worked for those 3 years, and I got another resume from someone who never worked in a real career, and was just a career student who just got an MBA, I'm probably giving the job to someone with experience almost every time. That's what I said.

But continue to speak in absolutes and say that an MBA will get him a higher paying job, more interviews, and Frank's jealousy.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Dave In Champaign wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Creating their own knowledge.


That really bothered me as well. Is this part of the "everybody's right" mentality, or just someone using an incredibly poor choice of words. I have little faith in the latter.


It just sounds like some terrible, bought-in-bulk Franklin-Covey book. Create Your Own Knowledge: The Nine Steps To Dynamic Reimagination Initiatives.


None of the above. It's called self-directed learning, it's the Holy Grail of modern pedagogy, and it's best achieved through the use of differentiated instructional technology. This thread is a bucketful of stupid.


It could just be me showing my age at creaky old 26, but I can't help but be cynical about some of this stuff. I'm not going to be so atavistic as to say that kids should schlep around a backpack full of giant textbooks and write all their essays longhand, but for context, I was in high school from 2000-2004, when fully embracing new technology was still in its infancy and being done rather poorly -- at least by my horseshit rural school district. The year before that, in 8th grade, we had just gotten a new middle school building that was going to be on the technological forefront with "tech modules" replacing home ec and wood shop and art class, and all they ever did was break themselves or get broken by asshole kids, and the whole thing was just a waste of time and money. That's not even getting into how all three grades were given two 25-terminal computer labs, most of which sat vacant 90% of the time, to say nothing of the computer lab in the library, the one for teaching keyboarding, and the one at the end of the hallway that had no discernible purpose for any special class or grade level but was there just in case someone might have needed it.

I guess where all this is going is that when we needed a new roof on the high school and a new music wing, the money wasn't there till it was too late -- for the class of '04, at least -- because we had already dropped so much money on all these computers that never worked or no one used that we couldn't get the funding to put the wind ensemble in a practice space that they could actually fit in, or walk from class to class without having to sidestep the giant garbage bins being used to collect the rainwater seeping through the ceiling. So when it comes to giant expenditures on technology, no matter how well-intentioned or how different their circumstances are from what mine were, I can't help but get a little itchy at the likelihood that the money they're dropping on this stuff is being diverted from somewhere that the money could be allocated more effectively.

So if SHS's roof ever caves in and inundates a box full of iPads, don't say I didn't I warn you!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Last edited by Curious Hair on Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Maybe they should use this money to figure out how to get these dumbass kids to school when it snows instead of technology most of them already have access to at home.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Doesn't apple partially/subsidize all of these ipads so the kids are indoctrinated to their little cult? I'm pretty sure that's how it worked when I was growing up, going from the apple IIe to the apple IIgs to * puts arm around buzz lightyear * macintoshes, macintoshes everywhere!!!!

you think these kids are gonna want a google nexus or a proper ipad when it comes that time to bow down and accept the future?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Funny you mention that. Every school I went to as a kid (gifted school in Mt. Prospect, public school in Arl. Hts., public school in Lake Geneva) had Apple computers, until we switched to Gateways in 1999 with the aforementioned computer shopping spree. I guess Apple can only go so far.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
sinicalypse wrote:
Doesn't apple partially/subsidize all of these ipads so the kids are indoctrinated to their little cult? I'm pretty sure that's how it worked when I was growing up, going from the apple IIe to the apple IIgs to * puts arm around buzz lightyear * macintoshes, macintoshes everywhere!!!!

you think these kids are gonna want a google nexus or a proper ipad when it comes that time to bow down and accept the future?


I'm watching Toy Story 2 with my two year old right now.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
Curious Hair wrote:
It could just be me showing my age at creaky old 26, but I can't help but be cynical about some of this stuff. I'm not going to be so atavistic as to say that kids should schlep around a backpack full of giant textbooks and write all their essays longhand, but for context, I was in high school from 2000-2004, when fully embracing new technology was still in its infancy and being done rather poorly -- at least by my horseshit rural school district. The year before that, in 8th grade, we had just gotten a new middle school building that was going to be on the technological forefront with "tech modules" replacing home ec and wood shop and art class, and all they ever did was break themselves or get broken by asshole kids, and the whole thing was just a waste of time and money. That's not even getting into how all three grades were given two 25-terminal computer labs, most of which sat vacant 90% of the time, to say nothing of the computer lab in the library, the one for teaching keyboarding, and the one at the end of the hallway that had no discernible purpose for any special class or grade level but was there just in case someone might have needed it.

I guess where all this is going is that when we needed a new roof on the high school and a new music wing, the money wasn't there till it was too late -- for the class of '04, at least -- because we had already dropped so much money on all these computers that never worked or no one used that we couldn't get the funding to put the wind ensemble in a practice space that they could actually fit in, or walk from class to class without having to sidestep the giant garbage bins being used to collect the rainwater seeping through the ceiling. So when it comes to giant expenditures on technology, no matter how well-intentioned or how different their circumstances are from what mine were, I can't help but get a little itchy at the likelihood that the money they're dropping on this stuff is being diverted from somewhere that the money could be allocated more effectively.

So if SHS's roof ever caves in and inundates a box full of iPads, don't say I didn't I warn you!


Cynicism is fine. sini is right in that it's not a coincidence that they're buying iPads (and not, say, Chromebooks or whatever); my fiance works for a school-research think tank, and her former officemate drew a second paycheck from Apple for basically infiltrating school-research think tanks and surreptitiously suggesting that they move everything to Macs, or incorporate iPods in the curricula they write, or whatever. And my high school's "media center" was (I assume) just as expensive and (I'm certain) just as unused as yours. Though I support this purchase wholeheartedly for a number of reasons both personal and professional, you could certainly make a case that this money would be better spent elsewhere, and I don't begrudge you your itchiness about infrastructure. I do, however, bristle at the idea that a suburban school's purchase of instructional technology is grounds for a fucking tax revolt. Hey, if these greedy schools are going to throw away their money on stuff that helps kids learn, by golly, they'd better not expect me to vote for their budget next year!

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Dave In Champaign wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It could just be me showing my age at creaky old 26, but I can't help but be cynical about some of this stuff. I'm not going to be so atavistic as to say that kids should schlep around a backpack full of giant textbooks and write all their essays longhand, but for context, I was in high school from 2000-2004, when fully embracing new technology was still in its infancy and being done rather poorly -- at least by my horseshit rural school district. The year before that, in 8th grade, we had just gotten a new middle school building that was going to be on the technological forefront with "tech modules" replacing home ec and wood shop and art class, and all they ever did was break themselves or get broken by asshole kids, and the whole thing was just a waste of time and money. That's not even getting into how all three grades were given two 25-terminal computer labs, most of which sat vacant 90% of the time, to say nothing of the computer lab in the library, the one for teaching keyboarding, and the one at the end of the hallway that had no discernible purpose for any special class or grade level but was there just in case someone might have needed it.

I guess where all this is going is that when we needed a new roof on the high school and a new music wing, the money wasn't there till it was too late -- for the class of '04, at least -- because we had already dropped so much money on all these computers that never worked or no one used that we couldn't get the funding to put the wind ensemble in a practice space that they could actually fit in, or walk from class to class without having to sidestep the giant garbage bins being used to collect the rainwater seeping through the ceiling. So when it comes to giant expenditures on technology, no matter how well-intentioned or how different their circumstances are from what mine were, I can't help but get a little itchy at the likelihood that the money they're dropping on this stuff is being diverted from somewhere that the money could be allocated more effectively.

So if SHS's roof ever caves in and inundates a box full of iPads, don't say I didn't I warn you!


Cynicism is fine. sini is right in that it's not a coincidence that they're buying iPads (and not, say, Chromebooks or whatever); my fiance works for a school-research think tank, and her former officemate drew a second paycheck from Apple for basically infiltrating school-research think tanks and surreptitiously suggesting that they move everything to Macs, or incorporate iPods in the curricula they write, or whatever. And my high school's "media center" was (I assume) just as expensive and (I'm certain) just as unused as yours. Though I support this purchase wholeheartedly for a number of reasons both personal and professional, you could certainly make a case that this money would be better spent elsewhere, and I don't begrudge you your itchiness about infrastructure. I do, however, bristle at the idea that a suburban school's purchase of instructional technology is grounds for a fucking tax revolt. Hey, if these greedy schools are going to throw away their money on stuff that helps kids learn, by golly, they'd better not expect me to vote for their budget next year!


School text books (from grades K-College) are a huge racket, a huge ripoff and a large waste of resources. I like the idea as long as there is an actual well thought out curriculum to actually pursue "self directed learning" and such. Often times, in my experience, it's "Fire, Aim, Ready" and they grand new ideas gain zero traction and are a detriment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38696
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Dave In Champaign wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
It could just be me showing my age at creaky old 26, but I can't help but be cynical about some of this stuff. I'm not going to be so atavistic as to say that kids should schlep around a backpack full of giant textbooks and write all their essays longhand, but for context, I was in high school from 2000-2004, when fully embracing new technology was still in its infancy and being done rather poorly -- at least by my horseshit rural school district. The year before that, in 8th grade, we had just gotten a new middle school building that was going to be on the technological forefront with "tech modules" replacing home ec and wood shop and art class, and all they ever did was break themselves or get broken by asshole kids, and the whole thing was just a waste of time and money. That's not even getting into how all three grades were given two 25-terminal computer labs, most of which sat vacant 90% of the time, to say nothing of the computer lab in the library, the one for teaching keyboarding, and the one at the end of the hallway that had no discernible purpose for any special class or grade level but was there just in case someone might have needed it.

I guess where all this is going is that when we needed a new roof on the high school and a new music wing, the money wasn't there till it was too late -- for the class of '04, at least -- because we had already dropped so much money on all these computers that never worked or no one used that we couldn't get the funding to put the wind ensemble in a practice space that they could actually fit in, or walk from class to class without having to sidestep the giant garbage bins being used to collect the rainwater seeping through the ceiling. So when it comes to giant expenditures on technology, no matter how well-intentioned or how different their circumstances are from what mine were, I can't help but get a little itchy at the likelihood that the money they're dropping on this stuff is being diverted from somewhere that the money could be allocated more effectively.

So if SHS's roof ever caves in and inundates a box full of iPads, don't say I didn't I warn you!


Cynicism is fine. sini is right in that it's not a coincidence that they're buying iPads (and not, say, Chromebooks or whatever); my fiance works for a school-research think tank, and her former officemate drew a second paycheck from Apple for basically infiltrating school-research think tanks and surreptitiously suggesting that they move everything to Macs, or incorporate iPods in the curricula they write, or whatever. And my high school's "media center" was (I assume) just as expensive and (I'm certain) just as unused as yours. Though I support this purchase wholeheartedly for a number of reasons both personal and professional, you could certainly make a case that this money would be better spent elsewhere, and I don't begrudge you your itchiness about infrastructure. I do, however, bristle at the idea that a suburban school's purchase of instructional technology is grounds for a fucking tax revolt. Hey, if these greedy schools are going to throw away their money on stuff that helps kids learn, by golly, they'd better not expect me to vote for their budget next year!

:) Wife just received 10 new iPads for her classroom. Wrote a proposal for some sort of grant and she got them. Whole school received 20 I believe.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55959
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Dave In Champaign wrote:
Cynicism is fine. sini is right in that it's not a coincidence that they're buying iPads (and not, say, Chromebooks or whatever); my fiance works for a school-research think tank, and her former officemate drew a second paycheck from Apple for basically infiltrating school-research think tanks and surreptitiously suggesting that they move everything to Macs, or incorporate iPods in the curricula they write, or whatever. And my high school's "media center" was (I assume) just as expensive and (I'm certain) just as unused as yours. Though I support this purchase wholeheartedly for a number of reasons both personal and professional, you could certainly make a case that this money would be better spent elsewhere, and I don't begrudge you your itchiness about infrastructure. I do, however, bristle at the idea that a suburban school's purchase of instructional technology is grounds for a fucking tax revolt. Hey, if these greedy schools are going to throw away their money on stuff that helps kids learn, by golly, they'd better not expect me to vote for their budget next year!

Oh, of course. I did my share of bristling when the referendum for the music wing and roof failed. All that "b'awww, them kids are fine" crap. High school is anything but fine as it is, and that's presupposing that your roof isn't caving in.

And I might as well be honest: with every school district looking to slash funding for performing arts, I really care more about protecting that fiefdom than anything else to the point of irrationality. It seemed like more often than not when it was time to drop big money on gadgets, the first place that saw its budget reallocated was performing arts. Core academics were fine, athletics were fine because SPORTS, you couldn't cut the trade-school stuff because we're allegedly creating jobs for the few-chore, and so that pretty much leaves music to get squeezed -- never mind that the one thing that my high school has produced, almost in spite of itself, has been performers. I'm a true believer in everything music education has to offer. I owe a great deal of my career (such as it is) and quality of life (such as that is) to the performing arts. If we can put a tablet in every kid's hand without starving music departments to death, let's do it, but only then.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:55 pm
Posts: 3287
pizza_Place: Olde Silver Tavern, Manalapan, NJ [R.I.P.?]
No shame in your game. I would agree with all of that. And in the interest of full disclosure, the reason I got so pissy about the creating-their-own-knowledge thing in the first place is that that specific term is a fairly strong indicator of where those iPads will get the most play; if it's the subject I'm thinking of, then it happens to be the one closest to my heart (and my paycheck).

@SomeGuy: Generally, yes. One reason I support the iPad purchase is that it's an intermediate step toward making student inquiry and differentiation of materials major goals in and of themselves, which in turn is an intermediate step toward eliminating textbooks from certain subjects entirely.

@badrogue: The Borg claims another victim. Seriously though, that is awesome. I really do love iPads for classroom use.

_________________
The Bulls haven't done anything wrong, and they're not going to do anything wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
SomeGuy wrote:
School text books (from grades K-College) are a huge racket, a huge ripoff and a large waste of resources. I like the idea as long as there is an actual well thought out curriculum to actually pursue "self directed learning" and such. Often times, in my experience, it's "Fire, Aim, Ready" and they grand new ideas gain zero traction and are a detriment.


I agree with the final part of this comment. My district spent a year teaching the teachers how to leverage the devices in their classrooms and only rolled out two grades in year one. Next year will bring 3 more and the remainder is year 3. While maybe too methodical, I'd rather do that than throw devices over the wall and say use them.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group