It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Stupid.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92035
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Stupid.
Because just like boxing, it's scripted and it doesn't have to make sense.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Seriously though, It made a little bit of sense when WWE bought WCW but why do they still do it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Seriously though, It made a little bit of sense when WWE bought WCW but why do they still do it?


There's been talk of getting rid of one of them for a while. You're right that it makes no sense.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Terry's Peeps wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Seriously though, It made a little bit of sense when WWE bought WCW but why do they still do it?


There's been talk of getting rid of one of them for a while. You're right that it makes no sense.

Im sure all the obvious arguments have been made but it really cheapens the WWE title.

I mean, which one is more prestigious?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Seriously though, It made a little bit of sense when WWE bought WCW but why do they still do it?


There's been talk of getting rid of one of them for a while. You're right that it makes no sense.

Im sure all the obvious arguments have been made but it really cheapens the WWE title.

I mean, which one is more prestigious?


I'm sure Vince enjoys treating the old NWA title like shit.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 3895
Location: Ninjas
pizza_Place: Perry's Deli Home of the Swaggie
They have 2 world champs so they can advertise and have a champ at both Raw and Smakdown house shows. It also doesn't hurt that it's another toy they can sell. I would prefer they do it like they used to and call themselves WWE and tour an A show and a B show. The A show gets your champ, B show is headlined by top angle not involving the champ. No reason to have 2 champs at this point. Drop the US title while you're at it.

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
They should do a champ vs. champ angle for next Mania. Would be a huge draw if done properly. Don;t unify the belts, though. Let the winner keep both and find a way to give one to someone else if needed later on.

After typing that out, that sounds like a terrible idea. Let's all just ignore that one...

_________________
This is my signature...


Last edited by Krazy Ivan on Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
Terry's Peeps wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Seriously though, It made a little bit of sense when WWE bought WCW but why do they still do it?


There's been talk of getting rid of one of them for a while. You're right that it makes no sense.

Im sure all the obvious arguments have been made but it really cheapens the WWE title.

I mean, which one is more prestigious?


I'm sure Vince enjoys treating the old NWA title like shit.

I'm surprised he didn't put it on Gillberg on the first show he could have.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
They should go old school and have the World and US champ just dissappear and never explain it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
In case we've all forgotten, the number one reason the WWE exists is to make money.

One more belt means one more slot to push, which means more asses in seats, and more merchandise potential. That's the whole mystery why there's still two belts.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
In case we've all forgotten, the number one reason the WWE exists is to make money.

One more belt means one more slot to push, which means more asses in seats, and more merchandise potential. That's the whole mystery why there's still two belts.

I realize that Don. They could also make more money by having 9 world champs. At some point, the ridiculousness trumps the bottom line. The WWE hasnt gotten to that point yet


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 3895
Location: Ninjas
pizza_Place: Perry's Deli Home of the Swaggie
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
In case we've all forgotten, the number one reason the WWE exists is to make money.

One more belt means one more slot to push, which means more asses in seats, and more merchandise potential. That's the whole mystery why there's still two belts.

I realize that Don. They could also make more money by having 9 world champs. At some point, the ridiculousness trumps the bottom line. The WWE hasnt gotten to that point yet


Sadly Dana White beat them to it. They actually have 9 titles (Hvy, Lt. Hvy, Middle, Welter, light, feather, bantam, fly, chicks bantam).

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
In case we've all forgotten, the number one reason the WWE exists is to make money.

One more belt means one more slot to push, which means more asses in seats, and more merchandise potential. That's the whole mystery why there's still two belts.

I realize that Don. They could also make more money by having 9 world champs. At some point, the ridiculousness trumps the bottom line. The WWE hasnt gotten to that point yet



I think to suggest, even tacitly, that the level of saturation from 2 to 9 is a bit silly.

You'll also notice that they really don't give two frog nuts about pushing the other belts they have, at least not with any consistency. Hell, being Tag Champs is a great way to not be on a PPV oftentimes, at least not with your belts anyway.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
nothing to see here. RPB does not like wrestling now.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
RFDC wrote:
nothing to see here. RPB does not like wrestling now.

Do you like the two belt system?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
In case we've all forgotten, the number one reason the WWE exists is to make money.

One more belt means one more slot to push, which means more asses in seats, and more merchandise potential. That's the whole mystery why there's still two belts.

I realize that Don. They could also make more money by having 9 world champs. At some point, the ridiculousness trumps the bottom line. The WWE hasnt gotten to that point yet



I think to suggest, even tacitly, that the level of saturation from 2 to 9 is a bit silly.

You'll also notice that they really don't give two frog nuts about pushing the other belts they have, at least not with any consistency. Hell, being Tag Champs is a great way to not be on a PPV oftentimes, at least not with your belts anyway.

Yeah, well for me 2 might as well be 9. There should be one World Champion.

And Tag Champs not being on a ppv is stupid. What happened?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
rogers park bryan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
nothing to see here. RPB does not like wrestling now.

Do you like the two belt system?

It does not bother me. I understand why they have it set up like that and it is a far cry from 9 world titles. There are biggest problems for them to worry about.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
RFDC wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
nothing to see here. RPB does not like wrestling now.

Do you like the two belt system?

It does not bother me. I understand why they have it set up like that and it is a far cry from 9 world titles. There are biggest problems for them to worry about.

Its always been a sticking point for me and was part of the reason I stopped watching regularly.

I just hate it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
They need more championships. WWE, World Heavyweight, World Lightweight, Cruiserweight, Intercontinental, US, European, Hardcore, Women's, Diva's, Hardcore, World Tag, Lightweight Tag, US Tag, Women's Tag, Million Dollar Man's belt, Cena's spinarooni belt, Hulk Hogan's World Heavyweight belt that he took w/ him when Russo fired him, Hardcore, Intercontinental White belt...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:49 pm
Posts: 1430
pizza_Place: Frozen Home Run Inn Pizza
Not sure


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 9:58 am
Posts: 4456
Location: @ ROH Show Near Me.
pizza_Place: Freezer.
If they do it right, and I have no reason to expect they should... You run Smackdown live shows in certain states, and Raw in other states. Gives it a sort of "our team" aura. Then you use Wrestlemania as a super bowl for awarding WWE-wide belts.

_________________
Middle Aged Crazy, like Uncle Terry


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group