It is currently Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:54 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/77632/divisions-debate-down-to-indiana-purdue

"East" division

Maryland
Michigan
Michigan State
Ohio State
Penn State
Rutgers
Purdue or Indiana

"West" division

Illinois
Iowa
Minnesota
Nebraska
Northwestern
Wisconsin
Purdue or Indiana

Please send Purdue to the West.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Holy lopsided if Purdue goes West. Would definitely take that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Holy lopsided if Purdue goes West. Would definitely take that.
Huh?

It's lopsided either way. That's why I want Purdue going West.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Holy lopsided if Purdue goes West. Would definitely take that.
Huh?

It's lopsided either way. That's why I want Purdue going West.


Yea it's lopsided either way, but way worse if Purdue goes West.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57907
I don't like it either way.

Any idea how they go about deciding?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
I don't like it either way.

Any idea how they go about deciding?
Since the march to 16 teams seems inevitable, I would guess that IU or Purdue jumps over in a few years too. Nebraska has to love it. They should be in the title game most of the time.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27586
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I don't like it either way.

Any idea how they go about deciding?
Since the march to 16 teams seems inevitable, I would guess that IU or Purdue jumps over in a few years too. Wisconsin has to love it. They should be in the title game most of the time.


fixed

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41216
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I don't like it either way.

Any idea how they go about deciding?
Since the march to 16 teams seems inevitable, I would guess that IU or Purdue jumps over in a few years too. Wisconsin has to love it. They should be in the title game most of the time.


fixed

ii Had the same thought that Wis doesn't have a worry about Neb.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
ii Had the same thought that Wis doesn't have a worry about Neb.
If your frame of reference is simply the last 3 years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41216
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nebraska hasn't been to a level in a while in which you could say they would be in this proposed title game. I am not saying they are bad in any way but Wisconsin seems to find a way to be close every year.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Nebraska hasn't been to a level in a while in which you could say they would be in this proposed title game. I am not saying they are bad in any way but Wisconsin seems to find a way to be close every year.
Nebraska is a national cornerstone program just below Michigan and Ohio State and Notre Dame. They've also won their division 3 of the last 4 years.

Wisconsin has had a great 3 year run, and it probably will continue in the short term, but Nebraska is the best program in that division. Iowa and Wisconsin are probably second and third though Iowa has fallen off recently.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41216
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Nebraska year-by-year records / rankings


mcubed PFPG PAPG
Year Rank Rank Rank Score W L T GWF BLF OW% OOW%
2012 19 28 59 0.918 10 4 0.609 -0.281 58.6 53.0
2011 24 49 42 0.991 9 4 0.633 -0.380 57.5 52.5
2010 25 38 10 0.818 10 4 0.618 -0.556 52.8 54.0
2009 18 75 1 1.043 10 4 0.487 -0.232 51.5 52.6
2008 23 17 82 0.975 9 4 0.400 -0.197 51.0 53.6
2007 53 28 115 0.197 5 7 0.330 -0.643 60.1 52.0
2006 30 17 25 0.831 9 5 0.428 -0.276 56.1 51.4
2005 31 67 25 0.631 8 4 0.510 -0.592 52.8 56.7
2004 67 58 71 -0.225 5 6 0.267 -0.975 54.4 54.4
2003 18 74 2 1.117 10 3 0.538 -0.269 48.4 53.5

As I said not bad but in the last ten years they are not automatically in the title game if they were in that division. Hypothetically.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57907
Any way you slice it Wisc and Nebraska are happy with this set up

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41216
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
RFDC wrote:
Any way you slice it Wisc and Nebraska are happy with this set up



That is really what I was getting at.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94423
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
Any way you slice it Wisc and Nebraska are happy with this set up
All the teams should be. Avoiding both Michigan and Ohio State is good no matter how much you suck.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41216
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Have they ever figured out how many teams from other division you play each year and yearly rotation? With so many conference games not many chances to play non conference cupcakes.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 31027
pittmike wrote:
Have they ever figured out how many teams from other division you play each year and yearly rotation? With so many conference games not many chances to play non conference cupcakes.

I would think it would be 2 and they would rotate. That would leave 3 non-conference games. I know I heard Alvarez talk about the non-conference games and they want to step who they are can and can't play as a league in these non-conference games.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Big Ten Realignment
PostPosted: Wed Mar 20, 2013 1:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12574
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Well, it might be good to be in the east also since so many of them are not eligible for championship play. :)

I think they probably should have done a straight up geographic divide to begin with, and this just illustrates the point further. You really can't try to pick and choose to keep competitive balance the same (for now.) Whose to say what this will look like in even five years. 2018, come back to this thread. We'll probably have a dominant Minnesota and Maryland squad.

They definitely need to drop that Leaders and Legends thing.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group