tried to watch the game at Vines yesterday and didnt get to see one goal due to the weather knocking out dish reception, but did see most of the first...

I know the Hawks dominated the 1st with 17-2 SOG difference, my question is is that going to be more of the norm in this series? As it seemed that LA's shots weren't great even when they did get a shot on goal.

Seems the Hawks could out skate this team.

Quick did look awesome, so that is going to be a hinderance, but other than that, am I correct in saying the Hawks should beat the Kings?

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

I had the same feeling after game 1 vs Detroit. We'll have to see what adjustments Sutter makes. Surely they won't continue to give the Hawks all that time and space with the puck again? Expecting a more tightly checked game tonight.

_________________
The motto of the B&B section:

I honestly don't listen much-Reared On The Score Thu Jan 28, 2016 9:38 am

Be careful basing too much on one game. After game 1 with the Red Wings I did not think they had any business on the same ice as the Blackhawks and they went on to win 3 games in a row.

I think the Blackhawks should win this series, but I am not confident in that opinion at all.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

It's not a matter of giving the Hawks time and space so much as the Hawks are just faster and more elusive than the Kings are. They made their time and space.

No, shots aren't going to be around 17-2 again (I think we ended at 36-22 Hawks, I want to say?), but they will outshoot the Kings more periods than they won't. The Kings haven't reckoned with an offense as good as Chicago's in the last two years. If you look at who they've faced--Vancouver, St. Louis, Phoenix, New Jersey, St. Louis again, San Jose--there's really not a lot of firepower there. Last year's Canucks had a good offense in the regular season, but came in with no Daniel Sedin and some severely rustled jimmies about it. This year's Sharks had a lethal power play, but were 24th in the league in scoring, which indicates near-total impotence at even strength. Everyone else was typical neo-dead-puck, just-enough-to-win-and-no-further rubbish. Quick might not look so great against an offense like this one.

_________________

We, the people who watched the game with an eye on shots on goal. I always have an out.

_________________

Yeah, you tried to take it back in the next sentence with a "they"

Too late, Luther

Too late

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

What's the answer, yes or no?

Hawks win 2 more they should make the finals.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Won't believe it until Steven in Burbank lets me know how it works

_________________
Team Cutler.

The Hawks should beat the Kings this series given the 1st two games. But if the Kings take care of business at home and steal one at the UC the Hawks are screwed.

_________________
Not a mult.

YES

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”

Thank you for answering.