It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 7:01 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » SHOUTOUTS!!

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 26 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Nas
 Post subject: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Great day for equal rights.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
denisdman
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33214
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I am with you. Time to put this issue to bed. Live and let live.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:27 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Great day for equal rights.


Did you miss yesterday's news?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Peoria Matt
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great day for equal rights.


Did you miss yesterday's news?


No shit.

Talk about a make up call.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43788
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great day for equal rights.


Did you miss yesterday's news?

This.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Tall Midget wrote:
Nas wrote:
Great day for equal rights.


Did you miss yesterday's news?


I didn't.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.


What an asshole...

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Don Tiny
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.


What an asshole...



What? Why's pmike an asshole? Skip the obvious reasons ... :D

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George
Top
 Profile  
 
KDdidit
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24453
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Good to see Scalia had an incredibly douchey dissent from the bench for DOMA.
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.


What an asshole...


Well thats odd? Especially since I am not against gays, marriage or civil rights? Sheesh.

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.


What an asshole...


Well thats odd? Especially since I am not against gays, marriage or civil rights? Sheesh.


:x

If I have to start explaining jokes on here....

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43788
pittmike wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
pittmike wrote:
I didn't see much in the initial stuff I just read. Didn't they simply say that they had no right to rule and that the 9th feds should not have even taken it? It reads to me like CA ban is/was overturned by high state court or trial court and that stands. Says nothing about other states. Probably would have been better had they ruled more broadly.

As for the DOMA it was obvious to me that would not stand. Again though it only helps folks where states do these marriages so they are recognized as more than 2nd tier marriages. Or I suppose those that go to a state to get married and return home?

Either way it is a step but not some huge landmark.

As for the civil rights stuff yesterday why the hand wringing and sure death of civil rights? Didn't say just update and don't punish states using facts and info from 40 years ago? Told them to take into account progress made? Correct me please if I am wrong here.

So I would say neither shoutout or d-bag. Kinda lazy of SCOTUS imho.


What an asshole...


Well thats odd? Especially since I am not against gays, marriage or civil rights? Sheesh.

Maybe he was just complimenting your asshole.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
:lol: :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Furious Styles
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
pittmike is just a little sensitive when it comes to asshole talk...

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:43 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Yeah but he takes a licking and keeps on tick(l)ing.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Hawg Ass
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
Keeping Score wrote:
I am very pleased with this meme.

What does it mean?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Furious Styles wrote:
pittmike is just a little sensitive when it comes to asshole talk...



I am really surprised I haven't appeared on a sig line with that yet. :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Houston Homer
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 3023
Location: defying gravity
pizza_Place: Meet you at Arni's!
KDdidit wrote:
Good to see Scalia had an incredibly douchey dissent from the bench for DOMA.



He's obviously insane! Why was he ranting about hedonistic sodomy? There's no hedonistic sodomy in marriages!! :lol:

Seriously, the law was NOT about sex, but federal rights extended or not to ALL married couples. Why does it always come back to sex with these creeps??

Today was a good day.

_________________
I follow where my mind goes...
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Houston Homer wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Good to see Scalia had an incredibly douchey dissent from the bench for DOMA.



He's obviously insane! Why was he ranting about hedonistic sodomy? There's no hedonistic sodomy in marriages!! :lol:.


Usually no regular sodomy either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Douchebag
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43788
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Houston Homer wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Good to see Scalia had an incredibly douchey dissent from the bench for DOMA.



He's obviously insane! Why was he ranting about hedonistic sodomy? There's no hedonistic sodomy in marriages!! :lol:.


Usually no regular sodomy either.

Image

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?
Top
 Profile  
 
Don Tiny
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 4:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
:x

If I have to start explaining jokes on here....



You'll do what you're told, Ivan-Lite.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George
Top
 Profile  
 
Houston Homer
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:23 pm
Posts: 3023
Location: defying gravity
pizza_Place: Meet you at Arni's!
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Houston Homer wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Good to see Scalia had an incredibly douchey dissent from the bench for DOMA.



He's obviously insane! Why was he ranting about hedonistic sodomy? There's no hedonistic sodomy in marriages!! :lol:.


Usually no regular sodomy either.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
I follow where my mind goes...
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Don Tiny wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
:x

If I have to start explaining jokes on here....



You'll do what you're told, Ivan-Lite.


Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Nas
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:11 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Image

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Terry's Peeps
 Post subject: Re: SCOTUS
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 26 posts ] 

Board index » SHOWS & MEDIA » SHOUTOUTS!!

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group