You're kidding yourself if you don't think football sates bloodlust.

_________________

It may do that for many, I don't disagree. It doesn't for me, and my main objection has more to do with the whole brain damage thing than anything else.

As for bloodlust, I guess I look toward movies for that sort of stuff. I'm not into it when it comes to sports, or at least not projecting it on to something like football (or that's how I see it).

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY

I could do without the collisions too. I'd rather watch a guy go 70 yards for a touchdown. Football may one day be played with two less people per side to open the field more and I wouldn't like it any less.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.

I don't think football really sells bloodlust. If so, they'd let them fight on the field or allow the players to smash others into walls with little to no penalty.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

Not sure where I fall on this list. I enjoy all aspects of the game to be sure. I must admit though when I see a hit like Bostic laid the other game I hit the edge of my seat and make man sounds. Maybe different because I played as a youth? Judging from people in my circles though it is not too uncommon.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

I see what you did there.

And I agree.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.