It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 12:05 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Adam Schefter says so on twitter. Irsay isn't as crazy as B&B say.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Chus wrote:
Adam Schefter says so on twitter. Irsay isn't as crazy as B&B say.
So I guess Irsay won't have to sell the team as Hub suggest Goodell may make him do?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Don't understand this at all right now. Do they figure he's overrated and dealt him before the rest of the league caught on? Perhaps behind the scenes character issues?

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Chus wrote:
Adam Schefter says so on twitter. Irsay isn't as crazy as B&B say.


ont-Day ell-tay Irtsay ees-hay ot-nay azy-cray.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
I like it for the Browns. The Colts will be a below .500 team this year so their 1st round pick likely will be top-15. Browns wisely going all in for a blue-chip quarterback.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Kirkwood wrote:
I like it for the Browns. The Colts will be a below .500 team this year so their 1st round pick likely will be top-15. Browns wisely going all in for a blue-chip quarterback.


That would be ideal but this is the same "brain" trust that used a first round pick on a 30 year old QB, then selected a great RB in the same round only to trade him after an 11 TD season for a draft pick. Maybe they had concerns about Richardson's youth.

This is the same GM, right?
Also, I don't think the Colts will be that bad. They made the postseason last year, and now have a good back to pair with Luck.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
veganfan21 wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
I like it for the Browns. The Colts will be a below .500 team this year so their 1st round pick likely will be top-15. Browns wisely going all in for a blue-chip quarterback.


That would be ideal but this is the same "brain" trust that used a first round pick on a 30 year old QB, then selected a great RB in the same round only to trade him after an 11 TD season for a draft pick. Maybe they had concerns about Richardson's youth.

This is the same GM, right?
Also, I don't think the Colts will be that bad. They made the postseason last year, and now have a good back to pair with Luck.

Nope, totally new regime. Colts squeaked out at home against Raiders and now have lost to the Dolphins at home.

Colts still have:
@ SF
vs. SEA
@SD
vs. DEN
@HOU
@ TEN
@CIN
vs. HOU
@ KC

They probably drop at least 7 of those.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:27 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Colts now have arguably the best young RB and QB. The Browns will get a mid 1st round pick at best. This is an awful trade.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27561
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Alabama beats the shit out of their running backs. He has a lot of mileage already on that body. His rookie contract should be up soon so this is actually a pretty good move for the Browns. This is not 1965. They need to pass the ball first. Now don't blow your draft picks on a shitty 30 year old qb.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:06 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Alabama beats the shit out of their running backs. He has a lot of mileage already on that body. His rookie contract should be up soon so this is actually a pretty good move for the Browns. This is not 1965. They need to pass the ball first. Now don't blow your draft picks on a shitty 30 year old qb.


None of this makes sense.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57615
Nas wrote:
The Colts now have arguably the best young RB and QB. The Browns will get a mid 1st round pick at best. This is an awful trade.

What makes this guy arguably the best young RB???

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27561
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
37th last year in yards per attempt at 3.6. Now he did catch 51 passes but 3.6?? You can't win with a guy getting that many carries with that little production.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
37th last year in yards per attempt at 3.6. Now he did catch 51 passes but 3.6?? You can't win with a guy getting that many carries with that little production.


I assume he faced an extra defender more often than not since his QB didn't pose a threat.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27561
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Kinda reminds me of Steven Jackson. How many playoff games has steven jackson played in? A nice asset but definitely not a guy you focus the offense around.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Alabama beats the shit out of their running backs. He has a lot of mileage already on that body. His rookie contract should be up soon so this is actually a pretty good move for the Browns. This is not 1965. They need to pass the ball first. Now don't blow your draft picks on a shitty 30 year old qb.


None of this makes sense.


I agree this is a great trade for Indy, but all of UMN's post makes perfect sense.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11115
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
37th last year in yards per attempt at 3.6. Now he did catch 51 passes but 3.6?? You can't win with a guy getting that many carries with that little production.


running lanes will be easier to find when you go from brandon weeden to andrew luck at QB.... and when you swap out the ravens and bengals in your schedule for titans & jags


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Drop In wrote:
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Alabama beats the shit out of their running backs. He has a lot of mileage already on that body. His rookie contract should be up soon so this is actually a pretty good move for the Browns. This is not 1965. They need to pass the ball first. Now don't blow your draft picks on a shitty 30 year old qb.


None of this makes sense.


I agree this is a great trade for Indy, but all of UMN's post makes perfect sense.


The part I didn't get is what about having a good back like Richardson precludes a team from becoming adept at passing the ball as well? I've read some articles discussing the new coaching staff's concern that Richardson doesn't fit in scheme-wise and stuff, and that sort of makes sense, but I'm still not convinced it's a good move to jettison a young RB who is only two years into his rookie deal.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
It doesn't make sense. If Cleveland had the option, I think they would trade the Browns instead of TRich. He doesn't work with your system? Say you want to start over and you're taunting Jacksonville to find a way to be more awful.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Drop In wrote:
It doesn't make sense. If Cleveland had the option, I think they would trade the Browns instead of TRich. He doesn't work with your system? Say you want to start over and you're taunting Jacksonville to find a way to be more awful.


I agree. If you think he's good and can be good for a long time, you find a way to make it work with him instead of gambling with a draft pick. Trading Richardson really compounds the horrid decision to draft Weeden in the first round of the same draft; new regime or not, at least with Richardson you could be somewhat optimistic about the offense you inherited even while knowing your "second-year" QB sucks, but now everything has changed.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
veganfan21 wrote:
Drop In wrote:
It doesn't make sense. If Cleveland had the option, I think they would trade the Browns instead of TRich. He doesn't work with your system? Say you want to start over and you're taunting Jacksonville to find a way to be more awful.


I agree. If you think he's good and can be good for a long time, you find a way to make it work with him instead of gambling with a draft pick. Trading Richardson really compounds the horrid decision to draft Weeden in the first round of the same draft; new regime or not, at least with Richardson you could be somewhat optimistic about the offense you inherited even while knowing your "second-year" QB sucks, but now everything has changed.


The old regime thought he was OK.

@danwiederer Browns drafted Trent Richardson: They traded 4th, 5th, 7th rders to Vikings to move from No. 4 to No. 3 to get TR.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
What young back (2 years or less) is better? He played last year with broken ribs. He is an every down back and will be even better in a good offense.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
Nas wrote:
What young back (2 years or less) is better? He played last year with broken ribs. He is an every down back and will be even better in a good offense.


I'd take Doug Martin. But again, this is a great move for the Colts.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I think Richardson is a top, young talent, but this article argues otherwise: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/96915 ... me-changer

I'm not sure how much stock I put into his YPC last year, and I don't care what Jim Brown thinks of Richardson. Does anyone who knows more about Richardson care to comment on this article position on Richardson? It essentially says Richardson is not a special back.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 9:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57615
Nas wrote:
What young back (2 years or less) is better? He played last year with broken ribs. He is an every down back and will be even better in a good offense.


Alfred Morris

Doug Martin

Steven Ridley

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
veganfan21 wrote:
Drop In wrote:
It doesn't make sense. If Cleveland had the option, I think they would trade the Browns instead of TRich. He doesn't work with your system? Say you want to start over and you're taunting Jacksonville to find a way to be more awful.


I agree. If you think he's good and can be good for a long time, you find a way to make it work with him instead of gambling with a draft pick. Trading Richardson really compounds the horrid decision to draft Weeden in the first round of the same draft; new regime or not, at least with Richardson you could be somewhat optimistic about the offense you inherited even while knowing your "second-year" QB sucks, but now everything has changed.

Without a QB I don't think any fan base can be excited for their offense. A Super Bowl will never be attainable. The Browns are wisely loading up assets to either draft weapons for a QB they draft with their own draft pick or be able to package it to draft one. Getting a 1st round pick for a RB who's done absolutely nothing except get overdrafted is an A+ in my book.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Agree with Kirkwood.


Running backs are a dime a dozen, do everything you can to get a franchise QB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
I really like this deal for the Browns. Trading away a running back almost always works out well for the team that did it. The shelf life for any running back is short. Champ Bailey is still playing in Denver. If the Browns get a quarterback that is still around in 10 years then it was a home run. They weren't winning a Super Bowl on the back of Trent Richardson. They may on the qb they draft.

For as good as Adrian Peterson is, his team still isn't a real Super Bowl contender. You can live without Trent Richardson.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57615
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I really like this deal for the Browns. Trading away a running back almost always works out well for the team that did it. The shelf life for any running back is short. Champ Bailey is still playing in Denver. If the Browns get a quarterback that is still around in 10 years then it was a home run. They weren't winning a Super Bowl on the back of Trent Richardson. They may on the qb they draft.

For as good as Adrian Peterson is, his team still isn't a real Super Bowl contender. You can live without Trent Richardson.


That is exactly how I see this deal. Great move by the Browns. They were not winning anything with him at RB and now they have a shot at getting an impact player in the draft.

I don't think the Colts are going to have a very good year so this should be a pretty good pick.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
It gives the Browns a chance to draft a TOP QB in a good QB class and follow it up by getting him a top WR. They have a good looking TE and an emerging WR in Gibson so they may be able to nicely revamp things quickly with this move.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
There will be a 3rd, 4th, or 5th round RB that out performs T Rich next year if not this year


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group