It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 2:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
With all the rule changes,how does a coach teach tackling? A lot of free-wheeling offenses and lesser athletes on defense make the NFL into a pinball machine with teams marching up and down the field. You can say it has evolved but I'm having a tough time seperating the lucky from the good (not just the Bears)

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
That's what I like about Chip Kelly coaching in the NFL. When you play football on a video game you don't let the play clock run down. You call your play and get your guys up to the line in like 10 seconds and snap the ball. Football would so much more fun with a shorter play clock.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I like sports where scoring is at a premium, not stops. The NFL is not there yet, and I hope they don't get there.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24453
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
leashyourkids wrote:
I like sports where scoring is at a premium, not stops. The NFL is not there yet, and I hope they don't get there.

Stop by the soccer forum!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
KDdidit wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I like sports where scoring is at a premium, not stops. The NFL is not there yet, and I hope they don't get there.

Stop by the soccer forum!


Ha! A reasonable premium, not a "slit my wrists" premium.
:P

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Seems like the NBA wants to move this way, too. I can enjoy high and low scoring games as long as they happen due to talent, and not incompetence.

For example, I would enjoy a SF-Seattle game that's 3-3 with 5 minutes left in the fourth quarter, but I'd hate a 40-37 Saints-Falcons game because it's more than likely that sucky defense is the cause of the high scoring, as opposed to brilliant offense against an equally brilliant defense. The same reasoning would apply to a 7-7 game between the Jags and the Jets - just bad all around, as opposed to a 7-7 game between the Texans and Patriots. The same for the NBA.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37980
Location: ...
veganfan21 wrote:
but I'd hate a 40-37 Saints-Falcons game


well that's reasonab--haaayyyy...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56540
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Not much is worse in the sports world than a 1-0 hockey game where a team scores early and then goes in a shell for 45+ minutes and you wind up with either 46 shots on goal from the losing team or 16 shots on goal and a billion that didn't even get through the shell. The NHL's solution to teams keeping five skaters back and not letting anything through? Shrink the goalie pads.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
W_Z wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
but I'd hate a 40-37 Saints-Falcons game


well that's reasonab--haaayyyy...


he did have the saints winning

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 22, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Green Bay-Cincinnati-more terrible football=exciting football. It seems to be the norm now.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
jimmypasta wrote:
With all the rule changes,how does a coach teach tackling? A lot of free-wheeling offenses and lesser athletes on defense make the NFL into a pinball machine with teams marching up and down the field. You can say it has evolved but I'm having a tough time seperating the lucky from the good (not just the Bears)



After last nights Denver/Dallas fiasco,I am wondering if this is what the league wants. Whatever THAT was last night,it wasn't NFL football!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24453
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Holding out for it to resemble mutant league football.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
The game hasn't changed, its just all the quarterbacks are better now.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Hatchetman wrote:
The game hasn't changed, its just all the quarterbacks are better now.



You are kidding,right?

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
KDdidit wrote:
Holding out for it to resemble mutant league football.
Tim Tebow still wouldn't get to play.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7342
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Over the coarse of NFL history, per-game scoring actually hasn't fluctuated all that much. the 70's were pretty low-scoring, but generally speaking teams score in the 20-23 range per game on average. It is definitely trending higher now for sure, but it isn't at all-time highs yet, teams aren't all of a sudden scoring 10 or more points per game. each era has its "high-flying" offenses that put up a ton of points, and horse shit teams that can't score to offset it.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/y ... son_totals


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
passing yards/game has exploded last three years.

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/y ... ushing.htm

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7342
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
what i dont like are some of the rule changes that are making it absurdly easy for a quarterback to get away with throwing the ball away with no ramifications other than loss of down. the perfectly legal intentional grounding in situations where the quarterback has given ground 15-20 yards, sees good coverage and is being pursued and simply throws the ball 30 yards out of bounds is totally unfair to a good defense. i understand protecting the QB and the rules prohibiting blows to the head and all that, but with rules like that in place scoring can't help but increase and there is no way for a defense to counter that.

eli manning got called for 3 intentional groundings yesterday, i didn't think it was even possible to get three of those called in a season, let alone a game! these days there is no excuse for getting an intentional grounding.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
How can you still get called for intentional grounding?? :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
The problem I had was the pass interference and holding calls on the Jets last night. They didn't call that in the Super Bowl, so why should they call that in the regular season? I noticed that the referee crew was the one that makes a lot of mistakes.

I think the NFL does want more scoring. I think they call pass interference much more closely than they did years ago. The way they call the game also contributes to teams being able to pick up first downs on ridiculous penalties.

In terms of injuries if the NFL wanted to stop some of them they shouldn't allow players to dive on sliding quarterbacks or hit players that are clearly going out of bounds.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43788
Hatchetman wrote:
How can you still get called for intentional grounding?? :lol:

I never understood why the QB spike into the ground isn't intentional grounding. The QB is literally intentionally throwing the ball in the ground.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
How can you still get called for intentional grounding?? :lol:

I never understood why the QB spike into the ground isn't intentional grounding. The QB is literally intentionally throwing the ball in the ground.
You have to be pressured for intentional grounding and be attempting to avoid a sack.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43788
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
How can you still get called for intentional grounding?? :lol:

I never understood why the QB spike into the ground isn't intentional grounding. The QB is literally intentionally throwing the ball in the ground.
You have to be pressured for intentional grounding and be attempting to avoid a sack.

The defense is probably less than a couple feet away from him, I would call that pressured.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93297
Location: To the left of my post
Douchebag wrote:
The defense is probably less than a couple feet away from him, I would call that pressured.
He is not in danger of being sacked. If the defense was able to get between the offensive lineman and the quarterback it would be intentional grounding.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 9:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
jimmypasta wrote:
With all the rule changes,how does a coach teach tackling? A lot of free-wheeling offenses and lesser athletes on defense make the NFL into a pinball machine with teams marching up and down the field. You can say it has evolved but I'm having a tough time seperating the lucky from the good (not just the Bears)



THIS!

I just wanted to bump this thread because even though it's fun to watch,the NFL has taken 2 steps back with this "no defense" allowed version. It kind of reminds me of Sosa vs. McGwire in MLB.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I agree Jimmy. This amount of scoring is stupid and the league needs to review it. It doesn't tell us who the better team is. It tells us who had the last possession.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11255
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
veganfan21 wrote:
I can enjoy high and low scoring games as long as they happen due to talent, and not incompetence.


:salut:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
I agree Jimmy. This amount of scoring is stupid and the league needs to review it. It doesn't tell us who the better team is. It tells us who had the last possession.

Completely agree.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
In addition, a good number of these games are being decided on subjective P.I. calls made by blind old men. When a coach's best strategy for a comeback is to throw a bomb and hope for a flag , it might be time to review some things.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40829
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I really think that the PI calls are the thing ruining games for me. I don't feel they should be called as ticky tacky.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group