It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 4:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Cubs to get new TV deal
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
The Cubs informed WGN on Tuesday that they were opting out of their contact with WGN to broadcast Cubs games following the 2014 season. WGN has 30 days to agree to a higher rate to broadcast the approximately 70 game package they air. After 30 days, if no agreement has been reached, the team can negotiate with other media outlets or might opt to create their own network from which to broadcast. This will certainly result in a hefty influx of additional revenue to the team.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16459
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Quote:
or might opt to create their own network from which to broadcast


I see this as the much more likely option.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Quote:
or might opt to create their own network from which to broadcast


I see this as the much more likely option.


It certainly had the potential to be the most lucrative way to go. WGN still may agree to the higher rates just to retain the Cub broadcasts before the 30 days are up. I doubt they can afford it though.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55840
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I mean, when the product is this good, how could they.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
The shitty Product will cost them enough revenue early in the deal, that in hindsight this might not have been the best route!

Moreland gone!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23752
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
They're dreaming of Dodgers TV money which they won't even come close to getting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
bigfan wrote:
The shitty Product will cost them enough revenue early in the deal, that in hindsight this might not have been the best route!

Moreland gone!

The product we are talking about is the 2015 model and beyond. By that time things might be greatly improving.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
KDdidit wrote:
They're dreaming of Dodgers TV money which they won't even come close to getting.

Generally while negotiating a deal you want to strike while the iron is hot and this is the coldest the Cubs have been in awhile.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91926
Location: To the left of my post
Phil McCracken wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
They're dreaming of Dodgers TV money which they won't even come close to getting.

Generally while negotiating a deal you want to strike while the iron is hot and this is the coldest the Cubs have been in awhile.
It won't matter. The CUBS network is a necessity for any cable company within driving distance of Chicago.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
They're dreaming of Dodgers TV money which they won't even come close to getting.

Generally while negotiating a deal you want to strike while the iron is hot and this is the coldest the Cubs have been in awhile.
It won't matter. The CUBS network is a necessity for any cable company within driving distance of Chicago.

I guess. Don't you consider baseball to be a completely dead sport? The kids these days with their twitter don't really watch Cubs baseball on the old TV.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91926
Location: To the left of my post
Phil McCracken wrote:
I guess. Don't you consider baseball to be a completely dead sport? The kids these days with their twitter don't really watch Cubs baseball on the old TV.
It's just like the Big Ten Network though. 10-20% of your customer base will freak out if they don't have it on day one. When the BTN came out, cable companies got calls non stop asking why they didn't have it.

Old people love cable too. They don't want to twitter a roku to watch the Cubs.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Look at the deals the Yankees and Dodgers have struck in recent years and then reconsider your question Phil.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
I guess. Don't you consider baseball to be a completely dead sport? The kids these days with their twitter don't really watch Cubs baseball on the old TV.
It's just like the Big Ten Network though. 10-20% of your customer base will freak out if they don't have it on day one. When the BTN came out, cable companies got calls non stop asking why they didn't have it.

Old people love cable too. They don't want to twitter a roku to watch the Cubs.

Yeah CBS is the number one network in America for a reason.

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Look at the deals the Yankees and Dodgers have struck in recent years and then reconsider your question Phil.

Pull your head out of your own asshole and then go fuck yourself

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55840
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
The Royals and Astros tried to start RSNs and failed, and I'd say the Cubs look a lot more like the Royals and Astros than the Yankees and Red Sox these days.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Curious Hair wrote:
The Royals and Astros tried to start RSNs and failed, and I'd say the Cubs look a lot more like the Royals and Astros than the Yankees and Red Sox these days.


Except the Cubs play in a major market and the Royals and Astros no not. That makes all the difference in the world and again, by the time 2015 rolls around they should have some of the better young players already at the major league level and the team should be significantly improved. From there, it should only continue to improve.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group