It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:29 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
It's really unbelievable how quickly the narrative regarding the Bears offense has turned around.

Emery/Trestman starting to build up some credit in my mind. Obviously his first draft is still a huge question mark (other than Alshon who just might be just short of elite), but free agent signings/2nd draft etc looking rock solid.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Northside_Dan wrote:
It's really unbelievable how quickly the narrative regarding the Bears offense has turned around.

Emery/Trestman starting to build up some credit in my mind. Obviously his first draft is still a huge question mark (other than Alshon who just might be just short of elite), but free agent signings/2nd draft etc looking rock solid.


They reinvented the offensive line. Everything good that has happened has sprung from their ability to at least pass block since game 1 (run blocking is still a work in progress).

The progress of Alshon has also been remarkable. He is on the cusp of being elite in my opinion. One more season and he is going to make Marshall expendable.

Bennett, even not being elite, has made a huge difference.

I'm at the point with this team that even with all the offensive holes, I say put the pedal down and keep drafting offense. QB, speed WR and 3 down TE would be nice.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:01 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
good dolphin wrote:
There were several throws Mc Cown didn't make that Cutler would have. This game would have been a blowout with Cutler. Mc Cown did fine for a spot starting replacement.

If Cutler is ready, he starts. If not, this is a really easy stretch of games after the Lions and he is not needed until Cowboys.



Right. McCown has played fine. Made some very good throws. I was impressed. But 22-41 isn't exacly lighting it up. No picks was great. But we also need to remember that both the Packers and Redskins are bottom 5 in pass defense.

The offensive line has also been great the last 2 games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:52 pm
Posts: 12816
Location: My Pants
pizza_Place: Geo's Pizza
22-41 with at least 4-5 catch-able dropped passes. Not that it makes it that much better, but still.

_________________
The Original Spanky wrote:
I don't like white rappers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I like that McCown's modest success gives the Bears a bit of leverage with Cutler. Not serious leverage, but a bit. Enough so that drafting a QB in the first round and starting the year with McCown at least sounds like a reasonable option.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
There were several throws Mc Cown didn't make that Cutler would have. This game would have been a blowout with Cutler. Mc Cown did fine for a spot starting replacement.

If Cutler is ready, he starts. If not, this is a really easy stretch of games after the Lions and he is not needed until Cowboys.


No one is arguing McCown has more talent than Cutler. Clearly Cutler is more talented. The offense has looked a lot better under McCown though. His decision making is superior. While he can't make all the throws that Cutler can he played within himself and didn't force any unnecessary passes into double and triple coverage. He took what was there. That allowed the offense to sustain multiple long drives (How many long drives has Cutler had this year or last year?) and that kept a injury riddled defense off the field. Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:14 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
22-41 with at least 4-5 catch-able dropped passes. Not that it makes it that much better, but still.


True. Like I said, very good game.

I like McCowen. He's certainly better than most backups in the NFL.

Just saying Cutler is better and plays once he's fully healthy. Let's not act like Cutler wasn't playing well. He was.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.
That only works with a good defense, which the Bears do not have.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:17 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Beardown wrote:
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote:
22-41 with at least 4-5 catch-able dropped passes. Not that it makes it that much better, but still.


True. Like I said, very good game.

I like McCowen. He's certainly better than most backups in the NFL.

Just saying Cutler is better and plays once he's fully healthy. Let's not act like Cutler wasn't playing well. He was.


If you looked at his stats they would say Cutler was playing at a very high level. If you actually watched the games then the eye test would tell you it's the same Cutler.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:20 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.
That only works with a good defense, which the Bears do not have.


I'm going to disagree. I think the long drives give the defense a lot of time to rest. In short spurts they can still be really good but when you ask them to stay on the field for a very long time because the offense continues to go 3 and out then they are going to get exposed. If the Bears win the time of possession battle I believe this defense is still good enough to win with.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.
That only works with a good defense, which the Bears do not have.


I'm going to disagree.
The Bears have allowed the following amount of points this season;

24, 31, 23, 32, 26, 21, 45, and 20. The Bears defense is not good. It can be good enough to win a couple of games here and there when they can get off the field on 3rd down and force punts like they did last nite, but it is nowhere near good enough to run a "kyle orton style" of offense and still win ~11 games and make the playoffs. That might work against a bad Baltimore team and against the Rams, but it won't work against the Lions, Cowboys, Eagles, or Packers again.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Last edited by Frank Coztansa on Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.
That only works with a good defense, which the Bears do not have.


I'm going to disagree.
The Bears have allowed the following amount of points this season;

24, 31, 23, 32, 26, 21, 45, and 20. The Bears defense is not good. It can be good enough to win when they can get off the field on 3rd down and force punts like they did last nite, but it is nowhere near good enough to run a "kyle orton style" of offense and still win ~11 games and make the playoffs. That might work against a bad Baltimore team and against the Rams, but it won't work against the Lions, Cowboys, Eagles, or Packers again.


I gave you my reasoning for it. You selectively edited my post. We will probably find out on Sunday. I imagine the offenses long drives allowed the defense to have enough in the tank to get off of the field last night.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.


I think calling it Orton style football is a disservice to both the QB and Trestman. No way Orton engineers five scoring drives, four of which went 60 yards or more, and one of which went 93 yards. Trestman made the QB better this game; in the Orton days, you hoped to give him a short field so he could help you kick a FG or score a TD. That wasn't the style of ball played last night, as evidenced by multiple long scoring drives.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Ortman/McCown, I don't really see much difference.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
Nas wrote:
Kyle Orton style of football may be best for this Bears team.


I think calling it Orton style football is a disservice to both the QB and Trestman. No way Orton engineers five scoring drives, four of which went 60 yards or more, and one of which went 93 yards. Trestman made the QB better this game; in the Orton days, you hoped to give him a short field so he could help you kick a FG or score a TD. That wasn't the style of ball played last night, as evidenced by multiple long scoring drives.


I always considered the Orton style of football to be taking what is there and not forcing anything. Making the safe play/call instead of going for a homerun. You have to get good production from your RB for that to work and Forte has gotten it done. He loves the Lions defense too so I expect that to continue.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 05, 2013 2:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
As I said last night, not starting McCown against the Lions would be criminal. Cutler is not a doctor and therefore should not be telling anyone when he is coming back, which is only for the sake of his own ego and potential for a big payday.

The turf at Soldier Field is a pile of shit, and someone with an iffy groin should not be testing it on a surface like that.

McCown doesn't have the arm strength of Cutler, but I will take a QB that makes good decisions and can run an offense to a T like last night. No INT's and just good decision making was shown last night along with some great play-calling from Trestman. He doesn't need to light it up, look at Russel Wilson's numbers from last week and although they won he was pedestrian.

Run McCown out there for as long as you can, then bring in Pouty McPouterson when he is medically cleared.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Josh Mccown looks to me like his arm is strong enough. He had some almost perfect tosses in the EZ against the Ravens that were caught but the receivers feet didn't land in bounds,too. Also Marshall dropped a 1st down right in his hands. Josh has been playing at a very high level!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 18, 2013 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Mc Cown has probably added 2-3 years to his career because of Trestman. This guy was as done as anyone a couple of years ago.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: McCown or Cutler?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 20, 2013 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
You just have to love this guy!

Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17 and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group