It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 6:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:23 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79562
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Apparently the editorial position of WSCR is that only the two or three teams who appear able to win a championship should try. Everyone else should be tanking for a draft choice. If it actually comes to this, sports will be over. The one silver lining in that case will be that Matt Spiegel will no longer have a job.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
+1 (as usual!)

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I agree with JORR and disagree that he's oversimplifying it. Good nomination.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79562
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Kirkwood wrote:
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.


How's that? The very nature of sport depends on the concept that competitor is actually doing his- or its- best to compete. Do you want to watch a team tank? It's the most idiotic thing I've ever heard.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:42 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Kirkwood wrote:
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.

Yes, Rodney. It's my understanding, you must first monetize it.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79562
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Mr. Reason wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.

Yes, Rodney. It's my understanding, you must first monetize it.


It will be very difficult to monetize a sport in which 80% of the teams are tanking. Or do Matt Spiegel and dan bernstein believe that the only teams that should hold such a philosophy are the ones they root for?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.

Yes, Rodney. It's my understanding, you must first monetize it.


It will be very difficult to monetize a sport in which 80% of the teams are tanking. Or do Matt Spiegel and dan bernstein believe that the only teams that should hold such a philosophy are the ones they root for?


So what you're saying is that we should get them both some Milwaukee Bucks gear?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Don't be a drama queen. You're oversimplifying it.


How's that? The very nature of sport depends on the concept that competitor is actually doing his- or its- best to compete. Do you want to watch a team tank? It's the most idiotic thing I've ever heard.



Image

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
This is my view of the NBA sort of. Not that they tank it but like 4 out of how many teams even have a chance.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
pittmike wrote:
This is my view of the NBA sort of. Not that they tank it but like 4 out of how many teams even have a chance.


Exactly! That's why the NBA will never be a threat to the NFL or MLB. There is just no hope for "Cinderella" teams.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

It's not the league being stupid. It's a flaw(if you wish to call it that) inherent to 5 on 5 basketball. I'm not sure what the league can do about it short of making the courts twice as big and playing 12 on 12. What would you do to fix it?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
I agree with JORR and disagree that he's oversimplifying it. Good nomination.


Agreed

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:17 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Mr. Reason wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?


No. somebody just showed showed the data here - since 1980, only 10 franchises have won an NBA title vs 18 in baseball. that's a pretty big difference.

Obviously, they could alter the rules to make it more a team game and less reliant on 1-2 guys.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?


No. somebody just showed showed the data here - since 1980, only 10 franchises have won an NBA title vs 18 in baseball. that's a pretty big difference.

Obviously, they could alter the rules to make it more a team game and less reliant on 1-2 guys.

What rules?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hatchetman wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?


No. somebody just showed showed the data here - since 1980, only 10 franchises have won an NBA title vs 18 in baseball. that's a pretty big difference.

Obviously, they could alter the rules to make it more a team game and less reliant on 1-2 guys.



College basketball does fine as a team game and not every champ is the one with the one and done guy. Obviously, this is what NBA wants big stars for tv money. Screw the fans in the assorted cities?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I would guess NHL has the most random chance of any team winning followed by MLB and the NFL.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:31 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Hatchetman wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?


No. somebody just showed showed the data here - since 1980, only 10 franchises have won an NBA title vs 18 in baseball. that's a pretty big difference.

Obviously, they could alter the rules to make it more a team game and less reliant on 1-2 guys.

I'm basketball one player can make a difference. Not so much in baseball.
I stand by my statement.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Problem is so many teams have essentially zero chance. Stupid leagues (not Ligues) is the problem.

Isn't that the case in all professional team sports?


No. somebody just showed showed the data here - since 1980, only 10 franchises have won an NBA title vs 18 in baseball. that's a pretty big difference.

Obviously, they could alter the rules to make it more a team game and less reliant on 1-2 guys.

What rules?



Allow true zone defense? Maybe actually call double dribble, traveling and offensive fouls on the "stars?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
you could make all kinds of minor changes. 5 fouls, closer 3 point line, hand checking, defensive 3 seconds, I could go on all day.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
you could make all kinds of minor changes. 5 fouls, closer 3 point line, hand checking, defensive 3 seconds, I could go on all day.

Except for the 5 fouls thing(which wouldn't really make a difference since star players are rarely in foul trouble), the rest of your list has already been tinkered with in the NBA with the same results. As I said, it's a problem inherent to basketball. You can't negate the impact of a single player through rule changes.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
FavreFan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
you could make all kinds of minor changes. 5 fouls, closer 3 point line, hand checking, defensive 3 seconds, I could go on all day.

Except for the 5 fouls thing(which wouldn't really make a difference since star players are rarely in foul trouble), the rest of your list has already been tinkered with in the NBA with the same results. As I said, it's a problem inherent to basketball. You can't negate the impact of a single player through rule changes.


The rules have always been further modified to FAVOR the stars, which the NBA figured would make them more money. When the Pistons won with a bunch of "nobodys" the league got pissed and made all sorts of new rules to prevent that from happening again.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
In watching my kids play basketball I noticed a rule I either forgot about or never knew. A ball handler cannot possess the ball for more than 5 seconds without passing or shooting it. Is there that rule in the NBA? Is it enforced?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Hatchetman wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
you could make all kinds of minor changes. 5 fouls, closer 3 point line, hand checking, defensive 3 seconds, I could go on all day.

Except for the 5 fouls thing(which wouldn't really make a difference since star players are rarely in foul trouble), the rest of your list has already been tinkered with in the NBA with the same results. As I said, it's a problem inherent to basketball. You can't negate the impact of a single player through rule changes.


The rules have always been further modified to FAVOR the stars, which the NBA figured would make them more money. When the Pistons won with a bunch of "nobodys" the league got pissed and made all sorts of new rules to prevent that from happening again.

No. The rules were changed in favor of offense because defenses were getting too good and nobody wants to watch a 70-68 NBA game, stars or no stars. When the league had lower scoring, uglier games there wasn't some magical equalizing effect. It was still a top heavy league that just wasn't as aesthetically pleasing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
In watching my kids play basketball I noticed a rule I either forgot about or never knew. A ball handler cannot possess the ball for more than 5 seconds without passing or shooting it. Is there that rule in the NBA? Is it enforced?

That's not an NBA rule. Hinrich would be out of the league tomorrow if it was adopted.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I don't know if the score matters. You can watch Charlotte and Toronto play a 120-118 game and neither has any chance to really compete in the playoffs. It is probably more the cap and other things that really prevent trades and player movement from year to year. What other league do you have to trade for a guy just for expiring contract or cut him 8 hours after you get him because it made the trade work for the cap?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I disconcur with the FarveFan but i'm not going to go back and forth BRick style. All I know is Kobe and Shaq LOST so they changed the rules.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Losing on purpose
PostPosted: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The new CBA is an attempt by the NBA to create parity. Not allowing star players to leave so easily and really penalizing teams that go over the salary cap. It may make a difference in 3 to 5 years.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group