It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:51 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38357
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Caleb Hanie is available.

Problem solved.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
I keep saying McCown sucks but after playing arguably the greatest game a Bears QB has every played and doing it in freezing weather I am willing to admit that I may be wrong. McCown may have just needed the right system to bring out his talents. I expect him to suck and in the 7 games he has played in he has been good to all time great. Why has he been able to get the offense and be more efficient than Cutler (I still believe he has far more talent) even though Cutler has taken at least twice the number of reps? McCown just may be a better QB for this system.

I don't know why that concept is so hard to grasp. Rich fucking Gannon was a career journeyman who won an MVP at 37 friggin' years old with this guys system. McCown played on awful teams and wasn't very good himself. Maybe its just the perfect synergy ( muhahaha) between a player and coach / system we see developing right now. So McCown has sucked on different teams, so fucking what. Its what he's doing right now, for this team that matters and he's performing at an unprecedented rate and better than the far more naturally talented superman Jay Cutler ever has. Bears aren't going anywhere this year and probably next year anyway. Save the money, let Cutler fuck off to Tennessee, develop a rookie, and if by chance its a one year turnaround and the D gets good next year you have a qb in McCown who you know can operate in this system at a high level and make your run with him. If the D still blows bring the rookie along and sit McCown.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Good post, BadRogue (finally)


It seems a lot of people forgot just how average Gannon was before the Raiders resurgence


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38695
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Good post, BadRogue (finally)

What can I say, Santa dropped one off for me early this year.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Score a TD against 31st worst pass D.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
I was always a Cutler defender, but this is it. If we re-sign Cutler to a multi-year deal with big money? Folly. I don't see how I can continue to root for this team. He's not good enough, and he's proved it again and again.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
This thread should have ended with the word Cutler. Do not resign Cutler.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I've changed my mind on this.

Unless Cutler is good to very good in beating the Packers and then, likely, also very good in winning a playoff game, the Bears should let him go.

I thought after the Cleveland game the furor would die down but it has not. Cutler is pretty close to not being able to win back a good portion of the fanbase which will lead to far too much team distraction going forward in years to come.

He's been Ditka'd. The drama around him is likely to wear this team and coaching staff out.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
I've changed my mind on this.

Unless Cutler is good to very good in beating the Packers and then, likely, also very good in winning a playoff game, the Bears should let him go.

I thought after the Cleveland game the furor would die down but it has not. Cutler is pretty close to not being able to win back a good portion of the fanbase which will lead to far too much team distraction going forward in years to come.

He's been Ditka'd. The drama around him is likely to wear this team and coaching staff out.


Come on, Doc. You're like my favorite poster on this board, but you think Cutler shouldn't be re-signed because of the fanbase not liking him? Is there a reason the fanbase doesn't like him? Is it possibly because his "talents" will demand a huge contract, but he has accomplished basically nothing in his career? I mean, at what point is it fair to criticize the guy? When is his "talent" completely mitigated by his lack of performance?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
pssst leash, doc is playing devils advocate

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Not really because of that alone. But, don't you get the sense that the team will tire of this "controversy"?

If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga. Next year will be the booing at home and the questions to the team about "how is Jay", "do you support Jay", etc. It wears on a team.

Even if he gets off to a tremendous start in the first 4 games next year and then has a clunker, it will come up again "there's Old Jay".

He needs to fix the goodwill right now in these next 2 games or it will be too much of a distraction, IMO.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Quote:
He needs to fix the goodwill right now in these next 2 games
How about the next 5 games, my friends?


Quote:
If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga.
Agreed, but that is because of the meathead fans and media. If the Bears lose Sunday, the offseason saga should be how unbelievably putrid this defense was all season. Even just a below average defense and this team has 11 wins.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Last edited by Frank Coztansa on Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
Good post, BadRogue (finally)


It seems a lot of people forgot just how average Gannon was before the Raiders resurgence


Yes, I was equally shocked.

I agree with BRogue... in addition, the league is DIFFERENT now. "Efficient" passers are dominating the league. Peyton Manning (WEAK arm at this point in his career), Russell Wilson, Drew Brees, Nick Foles, Alex Smith are all excelling...

Big-armed quarterbacks like Joe Flacco, Matt Stafford, Colin Kaepernick, Jay Cutler, and even Cam Newton are effective ONLY when they are also efficient. Their "big arms" mean very little in today's NFL unless they are also making quick, smart decisions.

I still fail to see how Cutler's "talent" is utilized in today's NFL outside of maybe one throw a game. Keeping an offense on time and in rhythm is much, much, much more important, and that is done through decision-making and a basic level of talent.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Not really because of that alone. But, don't you get the sense that the team will tire of this "controversy"?

If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga. Next year will be the booing at home and the questions to the team about "how is Jay", "do you support Jay", etc. It wears on a team.

Even if he gets off to a tremendous start in the first 4 games next year and then has a clunker, it will come up again "there's Old Jay".

He needs to fix the goodwill right now in these next 2 games or it will be too much of a distraction, IMO.


I don't disagree with any of this. I just think it is a secondary reason not to re-sign him. I think the primary reason is that he's not good enough to warrant any type of big contract. That's what I'm saying.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Quote:
He needs to fix the goodwill right now in these next 2 games
How about the next 5 games, my friends?


Quote:
If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga.
Agreed, but that is because of the meathead fans and media. If the Bears lose Sunday, the offseason saga should be how unbelievably putrid this defense was all season. Even just a below average defense and this team has 11 wins.


Yep... anybody who isn't a fan of Cutler is a meathead, Frank. Great counterpoint. Every time anyone criticizes Cutler, they are a meathead moron. You can only criticize ONE part of the Bears at a time. How do us meatheads not realize this!?

The only way this bit could be more tired is if you stole it from someone else...

Oh.. wait... you did...

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Not what I said, but keep jumping to conclusions.

The defense is the biggest problem with this team, and has been since week 2/3. The QB has been a problem at times, but is not the biggest issue. It is, however, the most polarizing issue so that is what will be made of it. Why would fans not want to fix the biggest problem with this team? Why would fans not want to talk about that. Defense has lost 3 road games against last place teams this season. If the Bears had won just two of those, the division would be wrapped up.

Most people who don't like Jay Cutler fail to realize that he is not the biggest problem with the Bears right now. Its the defense. Honestly, I don't know how you meatheads don't realize this?!.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Not what I said, but keep jumping to conclusions.

The defense is the biggest problem with this team, and has been since week 2/3. The QB has been a problem at times, but is not the biggest issue. It is, however, the most polarizing issue so that is what will be made of it. Why would fans not want to fix the biggest problem with this team? Why would fans not want to talk about that. Defense has lost 3 road games against last place teams this season. If the Bears had won just two of those, the division would be wrapped up.

Most people who don't like Jay Cutler fail to realize that he is not the biggest problem with the Bears right now. Its the defense. Honestly, I don't know how you meatheads don't realize this?!.


NO ONE IS SAYING THE DEFENSE DOESN'T NEED FIXING!

Is there any way to make you understand this? Do we need to use pictures? Are you a visual learner?

The Bears are facing a HUGE decision next year regarding what to do about QB. It's what this entire thread is based on. Many of us don't think the current QB, who has accomplished nothing in his career, is worth the money that many think the market will demand.

Where in my above statement did I say the Bears should trot out the 11 defensive players they have this year, next year? Why are the two mutually exclusive? What about what we are saying do you not understand? Please let us know immediately so we can tailor it to your understanding.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:39 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I don't think he should be signed longterm either. I still don't think the franchise tag is a terrible option, but I'm not going to lose sleep if they let him walk either. You are the one that brought up the point of only talking bad about one aspect of the Bears.

Let me quote for you;
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Quote:
If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga.
Agreed, but that is because of the meathead fans and media. If the Bears lose Sunday, the offseason saga should be how unbelievably putrid this defense was all season. Even just a below average defense and this team has 11 wins.
Dr Ken painted a picture where Cutler performs below average and loses Sunday, the Bears sign/franchise him for next year and the talk all summer is Cutler this Cutler that. My point was that if the 2013 Bears are put to bed on Sunday afternoon, the offseason discussion should be about how bad the defense was, not how bad the offense/QB was at certain times.

Clear?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Franchise him and trade him for a 2nd rounder.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank, please answer the following question...

Why not both?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:48 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Uh...Why not both what?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Uh...Why not both what?


Really?

Why can't both the defense and quarterback be topics of conversation in the offseason? Why can't they both be addressed? Why are the two mutually exclusive, in your eyes?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Anything can be discussed. Talk about the long snapper for all I care. Both can (and should) be addressed.

My opinion that the biggest problem with the 2013 Bears is the defense. If they miss the playoffs or lose in the playoffs, that will be the reason. Not Cutler, McCown, or Palmer.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Let me also add that there are two very successful teams in the NFC right now (San Fran and Seattle) who are successful because they have adequate quarterbacks who cost very little and were able to spend the majority of their money on defense. The current league rules, in my opinion, favor efficient quarterbacks who don't cost a lot. Ironically, the current rules which undoubtedly favor offenses, favor teams who are able to plug in a QB who makes good decisions and get playmakers on defense who can overcome the rules that put them at a disadvantage.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I don't think he should be signed longterm either. I still don't think the franchise tag is a terrible option, but I'm not going to lose sleep if they let him walk either. You are the one that brought up the point of only talking bad about one aspect of the Bears.

Let me quote for you;
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Quote:
If he plays poorly and loses to Green Bay, the entire off-season will be the Cutler Saga.
Agreed, but that is because of the meathead fans and media. If the Bears lose Sunday, the offseason saga should be how unbelievably putrid this defense was all season. Even just a below average defense and this team has 11 wins.
Dr Ken painted a picture where Cutler performs below average and loses Sunday, the Bears sign/franchise him for next year and the talk all summer is Cutler this Cutler that. My point was that if the 2013 Bears are put to bed on Sunday afternoon, the offseason discussion should be about how bad the defense was, not how bad the offense/QB was at certain times.

Clear?

The franchise tag IS a terrible option if you want to see the defense improved.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Anything can be discussed. Talk about the long snapper for all I care. Both can (and should) be addressed.

My opinion that the biggest problem with the 2013 Bears is the defense. If they miss the playoffs or lose in the playoffs, that will be the reason. Not Cutler, McCown, or Palmer.


I guess our expectations are different. I want to win a Super Bowl. Signing an average QB to a huge contract inhibits the Bears ability to actually spend money on defense. Today's NFL allows for an efficient QB and a good system, and it would be stupid to sink a bunch of money into that position for a guy who isn't even elite.

In short, to fix the defense, you can't continue with Cutler.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
In short, to fix the defense, you can't continue with Cutler.


You can though, if you want to. Pretty easily. Lots of money, and lots of guys on the defensive side leaving. And Peppers alone could clear up lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Bucky Chris wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
In short, to fix the defense, you can't continue with Cutler.


You can though, if you want to. Pretty easily. Lots of money, and lots of guys on the defensive side leaving. And Peppers alone could clear up lot.


Of course, it's possible. It is not probable when you give that much to your QB. It makes even less sense to give that much to a QB who isn't that good. Seattle and San Fran are great examples of this.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
In short, to fix the defense, you can't continue with Cutler.


You can though, if you want to. Pretty easily. Lots of money, and lots of guys on the defensive side leaving. And Peppers alone could clear up lot.


Of course, it's possible. It is not probable when you give that much to your QB. It makes even less sense to give that much to a QB who isn't that good. Seattle and San Fran are great examples of this.


Not wanting to give him the money because of how good/bad he is, is a different argument than the line I quoted, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
There is not going to be enough money to sign/tag Cutler and fix the defense. In all likelihood there is not enough money to fix the defense in one offseason anyway.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 433 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group