It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
He will shrug his shoulders at the press conference,smirk at reporters and say he knows he can "make that throw" on the 2-3 balls that were intercepted and cost the Bears the game.

On Monday,Bernstein will insist the Bears need Cutler back and Terry will stammer some bullshit in the background.


....and life goes on!

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I knew this thread wouldn't draw flies but feel free to come back to it on Monday when Bernstein argues the point that the loss to GB & Cutler's poor play means nothing. The Bears must sign him.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
jimmypasta wrote:
I knew this thread wouldn't draw flies but feel free to come back to it on Monday when Bernstein argues the point that the loss to GB & Cutler's poor play means nothing. The Bears must sign him.


If the Bears lose and Cutler plays mediocre or worse, the Bears would be fucking insane to re-sign or even franchise him. But I wouldn't put it past them.

If the Bears win and Cutler plays well, they will at least franchise him. If they win a playoff game, regardless of his play, the Bears will cave and sign him long-term.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
I think with Gould getting a new contract today, we'll know Cutler's status before next weekend.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
I hope it's ultimately Trestman's decision whether to bring Cutler back. He shouldn't bow to pressure form above. He needs to realize this will be his only chance at an NFL head coaching gig. If he's comfortable with Jay, fine. If not, he needs to put his foot down and demand the option to choose his own guy. I am going to trust Trestman, when it comes to the offense, until he gives me a reason not to. He's had some bad moments this year but I still think he'll be a good coach. This offense could be scary if they get a Knox type field stretcher, another TE that can catch and an upgrade at center.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:17 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Good post. I agree.

The rough times he's had is due to being a rookie head coach. He's clearly shown he knows what he's doing with offense, and I'm even willing to give him and Tucker a bit of a pass on defense because of all of the injuries and lack of personnel.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Trestman did good with an offense that has 2 stud WRs, a good TE, a good versatile RB and a much improved offensive line???

Tell me more about this offensive genius...

The Special Teams and Defense are terrible, he needs his share of the blame on that. People were quick to bash Lovie for having shit offense. Why does Trestman get a pass?

Mel Tucker has just overseen two of the worst defenses of all time in back to back seasons. Why does he get a third chance again?

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Trestman did good with an offense that has 2 stud WRs, a good TE, a good versatile RB and a much improved offensive line???

Tell me more about this offensive genius...

The Special Teams and Defense are terrible, he needs his share of the blame on that. People were quick to bash Lovie for having shit offense. Why does Trestman get a pass?

Mel Tucker has just overseen two of the worst defenses of all time in back to back seasons. Why does he get a third chance again?


Can't argue with any of that. I still think if Cutler started every game Alshon would still be a "complimentary" guy instead of a 1-1a type that McCown turned him into.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Trestman did good with an offense that has 2 stud WRs, a good TE, a good versatile RB and a much improved offensive line???

Tell me more about this offensive genius...

The Special Teams and Defense are terrible, he needs his share of the blame on that. People were quick to bash Lovie for having shit offense. Why does Trestman get a pass?

Mel Tucker has just overseen two of the worst defenses of all time in back to back seasons. Why does he get a third chance again?


He gets credit for maximizing the talents of all those guys. Jeffrey definitely has progressed, while I'm pretty sure bennett and forte have new career highs in this offense for yards, receptions, or whatever. Having Alshon do that end around that sets up other stuff is an example of Trestmans positive influence on individual and collective progress for the offense.

On the other hand I think you can make a case for blaming and or firing Tucker for the defense this year, even with the injuries.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:01 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:19 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Shorewood, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Whether it is fair or not, and whether he likes it or not this game will define Cutler as a Bear.

If he succeeds I imagine the Bears will sign him to a deal that is beneficial to both sides.

If he fails, which I believe he will, the Bears will let him walk or sign him to a short-term incentive laden contract. If he throws picks and looks like he has versus the Pack in his Bears career, he will be the most hated man in Chicago come Sunday evening. At that point, he may consider going elsewhere.

_________________
RFDC thinks I'm retarded.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:59 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Good post. I agree.

The rough times he's had is due to being a rookie head coach. He's clearly shown he knows what he's doing with offense, and I'm even willing to give him and Tucker a bit of a pass on defense because of all of the injuries and lack of personnel.


NO FUCKING WAY!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:01 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Trestman did good with an offense that has 2 stud WRs, a good TE, a good versatile RB and a much improved offensive line???

Tell me more about this offensive genius...

The Special Teams and Defense are terrible, he needs his share of the blame on that. People were quick to bash Lovie for having shit offense. Why does Trestman get a pass?

Mel Tucker has just overseen two of the worst defenses of all time in back to back seasons. Why does he get a third chance again?


You make a good point about Trestman BUT he was able to coach up a high school coach to play at a pro bowl level. His offense and his play calling has something to do with that.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57241
Mr. Reason wrote:
I hope it's ultimately Trestman's decision whether to bring Cutler back. He shouldn't bow to pressure form above. He needs to realize this will be his only chance at an NFL head coaching gig. If he's comfortable with Jay, fine. If not, he needs to put his foot down and demand the option to choose his own guy. I am going to trust Trestman, when it comes to the offense, until he gives me a reason not to. He's had some bad moments this year but I still think he'll be a good coach. This offense could be scary if they get a Knox type field stretcher, another TE that can catch and an upgrade at center.

This pretty much sums up where I am at with this as well.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Jaw Breaker wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I knew this thread wouldn't draw flies but feel free to come back to it on Monday when Bernstein argues the point that the loss to GB & Cutler's poor play means nothing. The Bears must sign him.


If the Bears lose and Cutler plays mediocre or worse, the Bears would be fucking insane to re-sign or even franchise him. But I wouldn't put it past them.

If the Bears win and Cutler plays well, they will at least franchise him. If they win a playoff game, regardless of his play, the Bears will cave and sign him long-term.


I doubt the bears are basing their decision on the upcoming game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Bucky Chris wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I knew this thread wouldn't draw flies but feel free to come back to it on Monday when Bernstein argues the point that the loss to GB & Cutler's poor play means nothing. The Bears must sign him.


If the Bears lose and Cutler plays mediocre or worse, the Bears would be fucking insane to re-sign or even franchise him. But I wouldn't put it past them.

If the Bears win and Cutler plays well, they will at least franchise him. If they win a playoff game, regardless of his play, the Bears will cave and sign him long-term.


I doubt the bears are basing their decision on the upcoming game.


It has to play a role. It's a big game. I don't think it should make or break anything but it should be part of the overall evaluation.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
RFDC wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
I hope it's ultimately Trestman's decision whether to bring Cutler back. He shouldn't bow to pressure form above. He needs to realize this will be his only chance at an NFL head coaching gig. If he's comfortable with Jay, fine. If not, he needs to put his foot down and demand the option to choose his own guy. I am going to trust Trestman, when it comes to the offense, until he gives me a reason not to. He's had some bad moments this year but I still think he'll be a good coach. This offense could be scary if they get a Knox type field stretcher, another TE that can catch and an upgrade at center.

This pretty much sums up where I am at with this as well.


Also hoping it Is Trestman's call. As a fan I want jay back. But honestly, f Trestman doesn't want him back (and Emery does), that would be really unfortunate.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Nas wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I knew this thread wouldn't draw flies but feel free to come back to it on Monday when Bernstein argues the point that the loss to GB & Cutler's poor play means nothing. The Bears must sign him.


If the Bears lose and Cutler plays mediocre or worse, the Bears would be fucking insane to re-sign or even franchise him. But I wouldn't put it past them.

If the Bears win and Cutler plays well, they will at least franchise him. If they win a playoff game, regardless of his play, the Bears will cave and sign him long-term.


I doubt the bears are basing their decision on the upcoming game.


It has to play a role. It's a big game. I don't think it should make or break anything but it should be part of the overall evaluation.


It's not going to sway the decision either way IMO. So pretty irrelevant. My guess is they have already determined what they want to do and it probably involves a contract number they are comfortable with. I guess they could use a poor game as leverage, though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Bucky Chris wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
I hope it's ultimately Trestman's decision whether to bring Cutler back. He shouldn't bow to pressure form above. He needs to realize this will be his only chance at an NFL head coaching gig. If he's comfortable with Jay, fine. If not, he needs to put his foot down and demand the option to choose his own guy. I am going to trust Trestman, when it comes to the offense, until he gives me a reason not to. He's had some bad moments this year but I still think he'll be a good coach. This offense could be scary if they get a Knox type field stretcher, another TE that can catch and an upgrade at center.

This pretty much sums up where I am at with this as well.


Also hoping it Is Trestman's call. As a fan I want jay back. But honestly, f Trestman doesn't want him back (and Emery does), that would be really unfortunate.


Yup, this off-season the Bears will likely lose an extremely productive and system-friendly QB. Oh, and i think Cutler is a FA as well...


:D

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:43 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Unless Trestman has been bullshitting this entire time I am sure he really loves the tools Cutler has and wants to work with him. I'm fine with Trestman making the decision on which QB to draft BUT I don't want him deciding how much the Bears should invest in Cutler. I'm perfectly fine with Emery making that decision. He's been a pretty tough negotiator. He got Forte for a bargain and he's cut the cord on others at the right time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Nas wrote:
Unless Trestman has been bullshitting this entire time I am sure he really loves the tools Cutler has and wants to work with him. I'm fine with Trestman making the decision on which QB to draft BUT I don't want him deciding how much the Bears should invest in Cutler. I'm perfectly fine with Emery making that decision. He's been a pretty tough negotiator. He got Forte for a bargain and he's cut the cord on others at the right time.


I agree with that. My opinion has been that trestman loves Cutler, but if the price is way too high, I'm on board with Emery letting him walk. That's really scary for me without knowing the alternative, but I don't think they should pay him top dollar.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 8:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Mr. Reason wrote:
I hope it's ultimately Trestman's decision whether to bring Cutler back. He shouldn't bow to pressure from above.


He doesn't seem like a particularly religious man to me, so this shouldn't be an issue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6856
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Juiced wrote:
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


Yeah,I agree with that. I also think if he blows tomorrow,launch him!

Juiced,
Regarding your avatar,I just picture you posting with tears in your eyes every time.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juiced wrote:
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


I disagree. I don't care if he throws for 5 TDs and 500 yards. Any performance tomorrow, no matter how grand, doesn't just blot out four years of data. There should be nothing he can do tomorrow to change our appraisals of him in terms of signing him to a new contract. Let's not Matt Flynn ourselves into signing him to a large deal just because of a game or two of spectacular performances.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
veganfan21 wrote:
Juiced wrote:
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


I disagree. I don't care if he throws for 5 TDs and 500 yards. Any performance tomorrow, no matter how grand, doesn't just blot out four years of data. There should be nothing he can do tomorrow to change our appraisals of him in terms of signing him to a new contract. Let's not Matt Flynn ourselves into signing him to a large deal just because of a game or two of spectacular performances.



The last two years,he has been better. Overall,if you want to grade him,you have to take in to account his terrible talent that surrounded him until 2012.

I think a fair grade is: B- or C+ with the arrow pointing up.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
jimmypasta wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Juiced wrote:
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


I disagree. I don't care if he throws for 5 TDs and 500 yards. Any performance tomorrow, no matter how grand, doesn't just blot out four years of data. There should be nothing he can do tomorrow to change our appraisals of him in terms of signing him to a new contract. Let's not Matt Flynn ourselves into signing him to a large deal just because of a game or two of spectacular performances.



The last two years,he has been better. Overall,if you want to grade him,you have to take in to account his terrible talent that surrounded him until 2012.

I think a fair grade is: B- or C+ with the arrow pointing up.


Totally agree on being fair and contextual about this. That's a fair point. But I do not think tomorrow's performance, whether good or bad, should move that arrow - wherever you or I may think it's pointing - in one or the other direction in any significant way.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Hi,
As to my original post in this thread,I can just picture him with his "don't care" 'tude talking to reporters after the game. He needs to be very careful how he responds to a loss on Sunday. The other GM's around the league will be watching his postgame for a "heart" check on this guy. IF he acts like he usually does,he may cost himself a few million dollars. Nobody wants to invest in a guy that really could give a rat's ass if he wins or loses.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Q.Bovifs wrote:
#1, let's not forget: Cutler is an Angelo guy.

#2 Early this season, I got the distinct impression that Trestman and Cutler do not work well together. I think Trestman was pleased at how McCown's play might have reigned in Jay's insolence a bit, but I don't think Coach T wants to deal with this every year, for years to come. I truly believe that he is riding Cutler out so as not to lose his own team stock like a Greg Schiano-type could.

#3 This defense needs 2 Big DTs and at least one ELITE level safety. You get those pieces, and this thing all of a sudden looks good. The cap room that will be opened up from dumping Peppers, Hester, Earl Bennett, and Cutler should allow us to make some primo moves.


Hey,I read this and liked it! Bears have a lot of dead wood to move regardless of tomorrow.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Trestman did good with an offense that has 2 stud WRs, a good TE, a good versatile RB and a much improved offensive line???

Tell me more about this offensive genius...

The Special Teams and Defense are terrible, he needs his share of the blame on that. People were quick to bash Lovie for having shit offense. Why does Trestman get a pass?

Mel Tucker has just overseen two of the worst defenses of all time in back to back seasons. Why does he get a third chance again?


While the offensive line is better, it's still below average. That said, you are right about the 2 WR's, TE and RB. He had lots of good weapons. The defense was okay early in the season when everyone was healthy and getting turnovers. But when the injuries took away a few starters (Briggs and Tillman particularly) and the turnovers stopped coming regularly, the defensive shortcomings became glaring. If Tucker couldn't operate Lovie's defense effectively, he should have said so, rather than taking the DC job under the condition that he operate in that defense. He should be replaced at season's end, which will probably be tomorrow.

Cutler has 17 TD's and 11 Int's. That is a shit ratio. He will have failed to secure the division with 2 chances to do it. He will have established a 1-8 record VS their top rival and most importantly, chief competitor in their division. He has to go. With 9 Td's and 16 Int's VS Green Bay and a 61.5 overall QB rating which resulted in the 1-7 record he has established VS Green Bay. If his history VS the Packers repeats itself (history so often does) I am going to be VERY interested to see if the Bears finally come to their senses and realize he's NOT a franchise QB and need to go in another direction.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6856
veganfan21 wrote:
Juiced wrote:
This was the year for Cutler to show us why he deserves a big boy contract. So far he has a C, with a lot of sick days. Not good enough for that kind of a contract. However, this is his chance at extra credit, to bring his grade up to an A. A win tomorrow and a decent playoff run, would be enough to earn him that big boy contract.


I disagree. I don't care if he throws for 5 TDs and 500 yards. Any performance tomorrow, no matter how grand, doesn't just blot out four years of data. There should be nothing he can do tomorrow to change our appraisals of him in terms of signing him to a new contract. Let's not Matt Flynn ourselves into signing him to a large deal just because of a game or two of spectacular performances.


Will take more then a good performance tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group