It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 34  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
MattInTheCrown wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
This is an open invitation to anyone. Predict what Jay Cutler will do next year. Yards, touchdowns, interceptions, records, injuries, playoff performances, Super Bowl victories. Will he outperform Stafford? Will he outperform Romo? Will he outperform Ryan?


Here's my invitation to you or anyone. Tell me what he needs to do next year for you or anyone to approve of this signing and I'll tell you if I think he will do it.

I predict I think the Bears have a better chance at success in the next 3 years with Jay Cutler at QB than any FA that they could sign this offseason or any rookie they draft.

It is impossible to say if this is correct or not so prediction on stats are meaningless.

How about he gives us 3 300 yard games? 30 touchdowns? I'd set that as a bare minimum.


30 TD's a bare minimum? He's never had 30 in a season yet in his career. He only had 19, in each of the past 2 seasons. He's not like Manning or Brady (each with 50 or more in a season). In the year with his high total of 27 TD's he also had 26 INT's. He may have a stronger arm than either Manning or Brady, but he makes too many mistakes that wind up as interceptions, to get high TD totals. 19/12 is a horrible TD/INT ratio. If Jay had a 2/1 TD to INT ratio (which he has NEVER achieved) it would be a great improvement. forget the 55/10 manning amassed this season, or the 49/10 he had in 2004. Forget the 50/8 that Brady accumulated in 2007. The 25/11 Brady had this past season (for him an off year) would be the kind of target to aim for. It's not the # of TD's alone that should be focused on. It's the TD's VS INT's . If he can minimize the mistakes and have a good ratio, it would be a major improvement. I don't expect it.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
I know you're looking for something to hang me by.
No, I simply want you to stand by your thoughts. For too many years, people like you have stood behind Cutler and thought it was "hating" to think he wouldn't perform. Then, the cycle repeats again.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
I know you're looking for something to hang me by.
No, I simply want you to stand by your thoughts. For too many years, people like you have stood behind Cutler and thought it was "hating" to think he wouldn't perform. Then, the cycle repeats again.


FWIW, I would expect that the way you think we support Cutler too much is similar to how much we think you hate him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
For the record, I'd be happy with 4,000/30. But, if healthy, I'd hope he'd improve some over this year's averages.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
Cutler and McCown combined for 4450 passing yards this year. Cutler had 19 TDs and 12 picks, McCown has 13 TD's and 1 pick. I'm pretty sure Cutler would have hit 4000 and 30 TDs if he didn't get hurt.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
I know you're looking for something to hang me by.
No, I simply want you to stand by your thoughts. For too many years, people like you have stood behind Cutler and thought it was "hating" to think he wouldn't perform. Then, the cycle repeats again.


FWIW, I would expect that the way you think we support Cutler too much is similar to how much we think you hate him.
That isn't really the point. It just gets tiring to be called a Cutler hater by those who refuse to put expectations on him. If I hate Jay Cutler at least I'm pretty open on my expectations for him. Too many on this board seem to accept whatever Cutler does as good enough.

That's why I respect Dr. K for finally putting some actual expectations down. Then, if he fails next year, we'll see if he's still quite as happy with him as he seems to be today.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:04 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
4450 yards, 32 TD, 13 INT from the quarterback position, but its wrong to point the finger at the defense for the Bears missing the playoffs this season.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
30 TD's a bare minimum? He's never had 30 in a season yet in his career. He only had 19, in each of the past 2 seasons. He's not like Manning or Brady (each with 50 or more in a season). In the year with his high total of 27 TD's he also had 26 INT's. He may have a stronger arm than either Manning or Brady, but he makes too many mistakes that wind up as interceptions, to get high TD totals. 19/12 is a horrible TD/INT ratio. If Jay had a 2/1 TD to INT ratio (which he has NEVER achieved) it would be a great improvement. forget the 55/10 manning amassed this season, or the 49/10 he had in 2004. Forget the 50/8 that Brady accumulated in 2007. The 25/11 Brady had this past season (for him an off year) would be the kind of target to aim for. It's not the # of TD's alone that should be focused on. It's the TD's VS INT's . If he can minimize the mistakes and have a good ratio, it would be a major improvement. I don't expect it.


You're correct, but your example of Brady isn't that great. He didn't really become "great" (more than 30 TD's better than 2/1 td to int ratio) until he was 30, which was his 8th year. He won titles; that's why Brady was great. 2007 and after have all been better than his first 7 years... until this year of course. Manning is in another world.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
spmack wrote:
Cutler and McCown combined for 4450 passing yards this year. Cutler had 19 TDs and 12 picks, McCown has 13 TD's and 1 pick. I'm pretty sure Cutler would have hit 4000 and 30 TDs if he didn't get hurt.
I guess I set the bar too low. :lol:

Still going to be tough to outperform two of these three: Romo, Stafford, and Ryan though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Still going to be tough to outperform two of these three: Romo, Stafford, and Ryan though.
None of whom are playing in the postseason.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
We ALL want the same thing at the end of the day for crissake


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Frank Coztansa wrote:
4450 yards, 32 TD, 13 INT from the quarterback position, but its wrong to point the finger at the defense for the Bears missing the playoffs this season.

No, it's fair to point to the defense. The problem here is that the backup QB played better than the starter, yet people are arguing that the starter is worth $54M guaranteed based on the offense's production.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
rogers park bryan wrote:
We ALL want the same thing at the end of the day for crissake

No, I wanted a shitload of money allocated to an obviously-horrible defense. Management decided $22M should go to Cutty.

Edit: I can see it now. Defense will be Cutler's excuse going forward, never minding the fact that Cutler's contract is what hampers the defense (of course Cutler will still fail to stand out, like always).

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Last edited by MattInTheCrown on Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
MattInTheCrown wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
We ALL want the same thing at the end of the day for crissake

No, I wanted a shitload of money allocated to an obviously-horrible defense. Management decided $22M should go to Cutty.

You want the Bears to win the Super Bowl


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:23 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
rogers park bryan wrote:
You want the Bears to win the Super Bowl
Exactly. I'd love for Cutler to throw for 4000+ yards and 28+ TDs. But if that doesn't happen, and the Bears go 11-5 and make it to the Super Bowl, that doesn't make Cutler's deal a bad one.

Before Rick jumps all over me, I'll say Cutler goes for 3800 yards, 28 TDs, 12 INT in 2014. That, with a healthy Matt Forte and even just an average defense should be able at least get a wild card birth.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
MattInTheCrown wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
We ALL want the same thing at the end of the day for crissake

No, I wanted a shitload of money allocated to an obviously-horrible defense. Management decided $22M should go to Cutty.

Edit: I can see it now. Defense will be Cutler's excuse going forward, never minding the fact that Cutler's contract is what hampers the defense (of course Cutler will still fail to stand out, like always).



With the defense as poor as it was, it put extra pressure on Cutler to make plays. Cutler&Pressure=disaster. If the defense is bad, you can look for him to throw 20 or more interceptions again and of course his excuse makers will blame it on the defense. A smarter QB takes what the defense gives, avoids mistakes and executes the offense. Jay is more apt to force big plays and wind up with big mistakes.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Cutler&Pressure=disaster


Have you seen his fourth quarter stats and comeback stats?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Bucky Chris wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Cutler&Pressure=disaster


Have you seen his fourth quarter stats and comeback stats?


An intercption in the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter is still an interception. His mistakes early in games are often a big reason why a comeback is attempted. A 19/12 TD/INT ratio sucks.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Cutler&Pressure=disaster


Have you seen his fourth quarter stats and comeback stats?


An intercption in the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter is still an interception. His mistakes early in games are often a big reason why a comeback is attempted. A 19/12 TD/INT ratio sucks.


Sure does, and it's better than the TD/INT ratio for Matt Stafford and Matt Ryan. So they must suck too, right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Still going to be tough to outperform two of these three: Romo, Stafford, and Ryan though.
None of whom are playing in the postseason.
That's the amusing thing. Those three players are hated on for lack of postseason success/appearances even with gaudy regular season numbers. Cutler doesn't even have the gaudy regular season numbers to stand on.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Spiegel just reported that the cap hits are -

Year 1 - $11MM
Year 2 - $15MM
Year 3 - $16MM

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Spiegel just reported that the cap hits are -

Year 1 - $11MM
Year 2 - $15MM
Year 3 - $16MM

The numbers he was claiming are strikingly similar to the speculation I found on twitter yesterday:

MattInTheCrown wrote:
Image

To clarify: based on the above speculation, the idea is that you backload the contract for big dollars. If you win Superbowls, you have the option of keeping him in year 6 and 7. The base salary in the first five years starts very low, and grows over time, with the bonus money prorated over 5 years so as to minimize the cap damage in any given year.

If it's indeed structured this way, it's great in year 1, because it's only a $12M cap hit. The downside would be that you're basically married to him until year 5, which is sort of the situation we find ourselves in with Peppers right now, where we can cut him, but a big portion of the cap hit will remain based on his prorated bonus money.

I think it's a good bet that this is pretty close to the actual contract structure.


Edit: I think those are the exact numbers he claimed, fwiw.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
WestmontMike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Cutler&Pressure=disaster


Have you seen his fourth quarter stats and comeback stats?


An intercption in the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter is still an interception. His mistakes early in games are often a big reason why a comeback is attempted. A 19/12 TD/INT ratio sucks.


Sure does, and it's better than the TD/INT ratio for Matt Stafford and Matt Ryan. So they must suck too, right?


If you look at the numbers for this year alone, but that is not the case over their careers. Cutler (as I pointed out in an earlier post) has never even had a 2/1 TD/INT ratio in a single season, nor has he ever had more than 27 TD's in a season and he only did that once and had 26 INT's to go along with them. Ryan had TD/INT ratios of 28/9 in 2010, 29/12 in 2011 and 32/14 in 2012. Stafford had a ratio of 41/16 in 2011 and his off year this season resulted in a 29/19 ratio. Do you wish to compare their career ratios?

Ryan 153 TD's/ 77INT's
Stafford 109 TD's/ 73 INT's
Cutler 155 TD's/112 INT's

Cutler is inferior to Stafford in career ratio narrowly, but FAR inferior to Ryan in career ratio.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Last edited by Elmhurst Steve on Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16489
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Funny how we don't know whether the cap hit this year is 11m or 22.5m. Do the Bears know? :mrgreen:

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Funny how we don't know whether the cap hit this year is 11m or 22.5m. Do the Bears know? :mrgreen:

:lol:


Even funnier that we arguing both scenarios just in case


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
So did Meatpants find that chart and pretend he has a source, or what?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Spiegel said it was a very reliable source.

And we already know that Matt in the Crown is the King. So, it seems legit.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
WestmontMike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:

Have you seen his fourth quarter stats and comeback stats?


An intercption in the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter is still an interception. His mistakes early in games are often a big reason why a comeback is attempted. A 19/12 TD/INT ratio sucks.


Sure does, and it's better than the TD/INT ratio for Matt Stafford and Matt Ryan. So they must suck too, right?


If you look at the numbers for this year alone, but that is not the case over their careers. Cutler (as I pointed out in an earlier post) has never even had a 2/1 TD/INT ratio in a single season, nor has he ever had more than 27 TD's in a season and he only did that once and had 26 INT's to go along with them. Ryan had TD/INT ratios of 28/9 in 2010, 29/12 in 2011 and 32/14 in 2012. Stafford had a ratio of 41/16 in 2011 and his off year this season resulted in a 29/19 ratio. Do you wish to compare their career ratios?

Ryan 153 TD's/ 77INT's
Stafford 109 TD's/ 73 INT's
Cutler 155 TD's/112 INT's

Cutler is inferior to Stafford in career ratio narrowly, but FAR inferior to Ryan in career ratio.

I added the carrer ratios for your consideration...

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
WestmontMike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
An intercption in the 1st quarter, 2nd quarter or 3rd quarter is still an interception. His mistakes early in games are often a big reason why a comeback is attempted. A 19/12 TD/INT ratio sucks.


Sure does, and it's better than the TD/INT ratio for Matt Stafford and Matt Ryan. So they must suck too, right?


If you look at the numbers for this year alone, but that is not the case over their careers. Cutler (as I pointed out in an earlier post) has never even had a 2/1 TD/INT ratio in a single season, nor has he ever had more than 27 TD's in a season and he only did that once and had 26 INT's to go along with them. Ryan had TD/INT ratios of 28/9 in 2010, 29/12 in 2011 and 32/14 in 2012. Stafford had a ratio of 41/16 in 2011 and his off year this season resulted in a 29/19 ratio. Do you wish to compare their career ratios?

Ryan 153 TD's/ 77INT's
Stafford 109 TD's/ 73 INT's
Cutler 155 TD's/112 INT's

Cutler is inferior to Stafford in career ratio narrowly, but FAR inferior to Ryan in career ratio.

I added the carrer ratios for your consideration...


Compare whatever you'd like. You didn't mention career stats, you brought up Cutler's stats from this year and said they sucked. Statistical analysis in football isn't an absolute indicator of good and bad or more importantly winning and losing. Tom Brady had 18/12 TD/INT ratio, won a super bowl and went to the pro bowl. The first 7 years of his career he never had more than 28 TDs, never had better than a 2/1 td/int ratio, only threw for 4,000 yards once, had a qb rating of greater than 87.9 only twice yet he was considered a top five qb.

The real issue with Cutler at this point in his career is injuries. If he can stay healthy, then the Bears can win with him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
WestmontMike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
WestmontMike wrote:

Sure does, and it's better than the TD/INT ratio for Matt Stafford and Matt Ryan. So they must suck too, right?


If you look at the numbers for this year alone, but that is not the case over their careers. Cutler (as I pointed out in an earlier post) has never even had a 2/1 TD/INT ratio in a single season, nor has he ever had more than 27 TD's in a season and he only did that once and had 26 INT's to go along with them. Ryan had TD/INT ratios of 28/9 in 2010, 29/12 in 2011 and 32/14 in 2012. Stafford had a ratio of 41/16 in 2011 and his off year this season resulted in a 29/19 ratio. Do you wish to compare their career ratios?

Ryan 153 TD's/ 77INT's
Stafford 109 TD's/ 73 INT's
Cutler 155 TD's/112 INT's

Cutler is inferior to Stafford in career ratio narrowly, but FAR inferior to Ryan in career ratio.

I added the carrer ratios for your consideration...


Compare whatever you'd like. You didn't mention career stats, you brought up Cutler's stats from this year and said they sucked. Statistical analysis in football isn't an absolute indicator of good and bad or more importantly winning and losing. Tom Brady had 18/12 TD/INT ratio, won a super bowl and went to the pro bowl. The first 7 years of his career he never had more than 28 TDs, never had better than a 2/1 td/int ratio, only threw for 4,000 yards once, had a qb rating of greater than 87.9 only twice yet he was considered a top five qb.

The real issue with Cutler at this point in his career is injuries. If he can stay healthy, then the Bears can win with him.


You are right, I brought up his 19/12 ratio for this season initially. You then chose to compare those stats to Ryan and Stafford's stats for this past seasom, when each had poor seasons. I brought up the career numbers to show that each has superior seasons to those Jay has ever had. I'll take a Brett favre -like career that includes a 20/29 Td/INT ratio in one season, if it also has season where it's 33/7, 36/16, 39/13, 38/13 and 33/14 and 9 seasons of 30 or more TD's. Jay doesn't have exceptional seasons great/awful. He has varrying degrees of mediocrity.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group