It is currently Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:14 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Discussion between Dan Durkin and Bernstein about prospects and how to potentially build a defense was interesting. Bernsy pointed out NFL is a copy cat league so will teams be begin building from the outside in on defense? Both determined it's an intriguing idea and could work.

I say no. Seahawks have arguably best corner in NFL and top-3 safety. Chancellor, Browner, Maxwell, Thurmond are all decent to above too. But, they gloss over Seahawks also having above average line in Bennet, Avril, Clemons, Bryant, Mebane etc. What I do take away from past Super Bowl champions is line pressure and safety that can clean up mistakes or ballhawk Reed, Pollard, Sharper, Goldson, Polamalu, Collins, Rolle is necessary.

Corners get all the press but I think safety is the key DB and what's needed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 9:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
The larger secondary has been in vogue for awhile now. As most of the WR's are bigger.

I think you still need one smaller, quicker DB in your secondary...guys like Tillman dont cover smaller WR's well, so you still need that guy on your team.

But a SS that can line up as a LB. Thats a Bonus.

I just want a LB that can lineup!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
bigfan wrote:
The larger secondary has been in vogue for awhile now. As most of the WR's are bigger.

I think you still need one smaller, quicker DB in your secondary...guys like Tillman dont cover smaller WR's well, so you still need that guy on your team.

But a SS that can line up as a LB. Thats a Bonus.

I just want a LB that can lineup!

I feel very confident in saying the Packers have the worst inside linebackers and safeties in football, just awful.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
bigfan wrote:
I just want a LB that can lineup!



Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:45 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Seattle Blueprint is essentially the Lovie Blueprint. I think I mentioned this earlier in the playoffs. If they win the SB it will validate the Lovie philosophy. Run the ball successfully and have a great defense that can force turnovers.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Nas wrote:
The Seattle Blueprint is essentially the Lovie Blueprint. I think I mentioned this earlier in the playoffs. If they win the SB it will validate the Lovie philosophy. Run the ball successfully and have a great defense that can force turnovers.

Drinking early Nas?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:43 pm
Posts: 3715
Location: The Kingdom of Gene Siegel
Goddamn Hawg you are making me think about AJ Hawk. What a useless sack of formerly steroided shit he is. I swear I think he is smaller than most safeties.

_________________
Back off, Warchild. Seriously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 10:54 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Seattle Blueprint is essentially the Lovie Blueprint. I think I mentioned this earlier in the playoffs. If they win the SB it will validate the Lovie philosophy. Run the ball successfully and have a great defense that can force turnovers.

Drinking early Nas?


:lol: I honestly can't tell you the last time I had a drink. You don't believe Seattle is doing what Lovie tried to do with the Bears?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Seattle Blueprint is essentially the Lovie Blueprint. I think I mentioned this earlier in the playoffs. If they win the SB it will validate the Lovie philosophy. Run the ball successfully and have a great defense that can force turnovers.

Drinking early Nas?


:lol: I honestly can't tell you the last time I had a drink. You don't believe Seattle is doing what Lovie tried to do with the Bears?

Grand scheme yes. But you could copy Lovie D. It's nearly impossible to copy Seahawks defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30280
Zizou - I watch San Fran's and Seattle ILB and Safeties and just laugh thinking the Packers aren't in the same area code when looking how much better they are than the Packers. It is very noticeable, and I don't know how fast you can get that fixed with the way they choose to go about with their player personnel.


NAS- :lol:

Just having a little fun. They just have better players, the Seahawks defense is really good, maybe historically.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
The Seattle Blueprint is essentially the Lovie Blueprint. I think I mentioned this earlier in the playoffs. If they win the SB it will validate the Lovie philosophy. Run the ball successfully and have a great defense that can force turnovers.

Drinking early Nas?


Seattle's Defense is way too aggressive for Lovie.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 23, 2014 11:40 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
A Seattle victory may convince some GM's that you can win a SB with defense.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91903
Location: To the left of my post
If you have a cheap but effective quarterback like Russell Wilson you can probably think about copying it.

I don't think it's a coincidence that Kaepernick and Wilson happen to be the two lowest paid starting quarterbacks in the league.

I really see the key to winning in the league going forward to be this:
1) Future/Potential hall of fame quarterback.
2) Quality performer on a rookie deal with the lower the pick the better.

The rookie salary structure has really put great value on young quarterbacks.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Nah...this don't look like lovie anything...looks like the guy livie try to copy though, monte kiffen defense with tampa,

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82140
The Bears need to aim to be the Saints, not he Seahawks.

Saints defense was every bit as bad last year as this year's Bears. They made a quick fix but really didn't do anything that difficult. They are not dominating but pretty good with the offense driving the team.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group