March WSCR -VS- WMVP Ratings Results

Scorehead · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 12:20 am

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7.
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

Chus · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:49 am

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Telegram Sam · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:14 am

Diversity is not the key to a successful niche radio station. A vague semblance of 'variety" maybe, but not "Talkin' Bulls with a Gay Puerto Rican" diversity.

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 29758

Telegram Sam wrote:

Diversity is not the key to a successful niche radio station. A vague semblance of 'variety" maybe, but not "Talkin' Bulls with a Gay Puerto Rican" diversity.

bigfan · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:33 am

Q.Bovifs wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Diversity is key.

SCR needs to:

A. Have at least ONE(1) full-time female host;

B. Have at least ONE (1) full-time high profile local ex-jock host;

C. Have at least ONE (1) full-time Hispanic Host. Why is there not one employed now?

D. Have at least one professionally-trained comedian on staff, either as a show host or writer.

Until they complete these four things, the station will be a lacking, minor league outfit.

I don't agree with you at all, because I could have a female, boring, exjock who is a female comedian. His name is Pat Tomasulo. For the record, this guy steals peoples bits everywhere

Seacrest · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 9:40 am

The numbers in the men 25-54 and 18-34demo are what really matters in the ratings.

DannyB · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:10 am

Do they publish the ratings for morning and afternoon drive? I'd be curious to see those. They used to be in the newspaper every quarter.

Edit: Found this but I'd like to see the whole list.

For the December period ratings for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this:
Monday-Sunday, 6:00am-Midnight -- WSCR-AM #6 with a 4.4; WMVP-AM #7 with a 4.1
Weekdays 6:00am-10:00am -- WSCR-AM #3 with a 5.3; WMVP #4 with a 5.0
Weekdays 10:00am-3:00pm -- WMVP-AM #4 with a 4.9; WSCR-AM #7 with a 3.9
Weekdays 3:00pm-7:00pm -- WSCR-AM #2 with a 5.0; WMVP-AM #4 with a 4.7

In the total number of listeners, WMVP-AM has taken the lead over WSCR-AM. In the December ratings period for Men 25-54, it was...
Monday-Sunday, 6:00am-Midnight -- WMVP-AM 305,400; WSCR-AM 265,900
Monday-Sunday Prime Hours (6:00am-7:00pm) -- WMVP-AM 258,900; WSCR-AM 217,800

For the 2013 Fall Book ratings period for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this:
Monday-Sunday, 6:00am-Midnight -- WSCR-AM #6 with a 4.4; WMVP-AM #7 with a 4.1
Mornings -- WSCR-AM #3 with a 5.5; WMVP #4 with a 4.7
Middays -- WMVP-AM #5 with a 4.3; WSCR-AM #8 with a 3.8
Afternoons -- WSCR-AM #1 with a 5.1; WMVP-AM #8 with a 4.0

In the total number of listeners for the 2013 Fall Book ratings period for Men 25-54, WMVP-AM has also taken the lead over WSCR-AM. The comparison looked like this:
Monday-Sunday, 6:00am-Midnight -- WMVP-AM 284,200; WSCR-AM 256,600

badrogue17 · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:22 am

So MVP is beating SCR middays? Wow

Scorehead · **Posted:** Wed Apr 16, 2014 10:31 am

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Because The Score has become tired and stale. Berns, Meatpants, Hanley, Larry and Les are all Terrible. It's time for some new blood.

Chus · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 12:53 pm

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Because The Score has become tired and stale. Berns, Meatpants, Hanley, Larry and Les are all Terrible. It's time for some new blood.

You are avoiding the question. Why is it important to you that Mitch fires some Joos?

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:03 pm

DannyB wrote:

For the December period ratings for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this: Weekdays 10:00am-3:00pm -- WMVP-AM #4 with a 4.9; WSCR-AM #7 with a 3.9

For the 2013 Fall Book ratings period for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this:
Middays -- WMVP-AM #5 with a 4.3; WSCR-AM #8 with a 3.8
Afternoons -- WSCR-AM #1 with a 5.1; WMVP-AM #8 with a 4.0

I said all along it was merely a question of when Waddly & Silvy would get higher ratings than B&B, not a question of if.

Congrats to W&S!

pittmike · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:05 pm

I guess B&B made their bed and not they can shit in it.

Beardown · **Joined:** Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm **Posts:** 33972

Q.Bovifs wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Diversity is key.

SCR needs to:

A. Have at least ONE(1) full-time female host;

B. Have at least ONE (1) full-time high profile local ex-jock host;

C. Have at least ONE (1) full-time Hispanic Host. Why is there not one employed now?

D. Have at least one professionally-trained comedian on staff, either as a show host or writer.

Until they complete these four things, the station will be a lacking, minor league outfit.

The Score can kill 4 of the diversity birds with one stone. Simply hire and ex WNBA women who is half hispanic, half black and a lesbian.

RFDC · **Joined:** Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm **Posts:** 56712

Frank Coztansa wrote:

DannyB wrote:

For the December period ratings for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this: Weekdays 10:00am-3:00pm -- WMVP-AM #4 with a 4.9; WSCR-AM #7 with a 3.9

For the 2013 Fall Book ratings period for Men 25-54, the ratings looked like this:
Middays -- WMVP-AM #5 with a 4.3; WSCR-AM #8 with a 3.8
Afternoons -- WSCR-AM #1 with a 5.1; WMVP-AM #8 with a 4.0

I said all along it was merely a question of when Waddly & Silvy would get higher ratings than B&B, not a question of if.

Congrats to W&S!

How is that higher ratings for W&S?

If you include 10 to 3 they get higher for a month? Thats not really a fair comparison.

Afternoons for the fall, the Score wins easily.

Frank Coztansa · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:08 pm

Yeah I was looking at middays. Oops :oops:

The numbers are still getting closer and closer.

Scorehead · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:24 pm

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

The March radio ratings were released last week.

670 The Score got a 2.0
ESPN 1000 a 1.7
The Game 87.7 a .3

WMVP closing the gap to within .03 of The Score will give Mitch the runs. I'm hoping that ESPN 1000 passes WSCR in the ratings so that Mitch might awake from his slumber to shake things up.

That would be a .3 gap between 670 and 1000, not a .03 gap.

You do this every time the ratings are released. The Score is winning again, so why are you so hell bent on seeing Mitch fire some Joos?

Because The Score has become tired and stale. Berns, Meatpants, Hanley, Larry and Les are all Terrible. It's time for some new blood.

You are avoiding the question. Why is it important to you that Mitch fires some Joos?

Just the Joos that are terrible at radio. Also, Larry & Hanley arent Joos.

Curious Hair · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:24 pm

I don't know about the diversity thing, but the station's preference for clones is getting worrisome.

Chus · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:38 pm

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

You are avoiding the question. Why is it important to you that Mitch fires some Joos?

Just the Joos that are terrible at radio. Also, Larry & Hanley arent Joos.

You said that Mitch won't fire Joos (your actual words). Only bigots like yourself would come up with such an absurd premise.

Does the United Negro College Fund get under your skin, as well?

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:45 pm

Curious Hair wrote:

I don't know about the diversity thing, but the station's preference for clones is getting worrisome.

They need diversity of opinion and personality, not Dan Hampton in heels.

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:46 pm

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

You are avoiding the question. Why is it important to you that Mitch fires some Joos?

Just the Joos that are terrible at radio. Also, Larry & Hanley arent Joos.

You said that Mitch won't fire Joos (your actual words). Only bigots like yourself would come up with such an absurd premise.

Does the United Negro College Fund get under your skin, as well?

This could get interesting ...

Scorehead · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:48 pm

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

You are avoiding the question. Why is it important to you that Mitch fires some Joos?

Just the Joos that are terrible at radio. Also, Larry & Hanley arent Joos.

You said that Mitch won't fire Joos (your actual words). Only bigots like yourself would come up with such an absurd premise.

Does the United Negro College Fund get under your skin, as well?

That's not exactly what I said. Do you ever stop looking for a confrontation with me? You take this CSFMB business way too serious and way to literal. Your "I like the Joos and balcks more than you" is a tiresome waste of time and quite honestly is ignorant, intollerant, sterotypical, and immature.
Maybe you and I should only take about Jaspers?

Chus · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:31 pm

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

You said that Mitch won't fire Joos (your actual words). Only bigots like yourself would come up with such an absurd premise.

Does the United Negro College Fund get under your skin, as well?

That's not exactly what I said.

False.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=156&p=1970678

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Meatpants has absolutely zero value to The Score. No one tunes in to listen to him. I doubt that Mitch would launch him though.

The Joo thing again, huh?

Mitch hires 'em but doesn't fire 'em.

Here, you insinuate that Mitch hired Bruce simply because he is a member of the tribe.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=156&p=1965408

Scorehead wrote:

Levine is terrible. Awful voice & he's a tool who doesn't get along with anyone. He's had words with a few Score guys who he has co-hosted with already. I have no idea why Mitch hired him. Wait...never mind...

Those are the words of a bigot. Why don't you just own it?

I'm going to bookmark this thread, so the next time somebody calls you a bigot, and you deny it and ask for proof, I will have it.

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:48 pm

Will Scorehead have a rebuttal? Only time will tell...

Curious Hair · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:48 pm

For a pothead, you sure have the motivation to doggedly follow people around and annoy them.

RFDC · **Joined:** Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm **Posts:** 56712

Curious Hair wrote:

For a pothead, you sure have the motivation to doggedly follow people around and annoy them.

leashyourkids · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:50 pm

Curious Hair wrote:

For a pothead, you sure have the motivation to doggedly follow people around and annoy them.

Me!?

Hawg Ass · **Joined:** Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm **Posts:** 29758

RFDC wrote:

Curious Hair wrote:

For a pothead, you sure have the motivation to doggedly follow people around and annoy them.

Chus · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:58 pm

Curious Hair wrote:

For a pothead, you sure have the motivation to doggedly follow people around and annoy them.

That's an interesting take from a guy who repeatedly followed me around, to tell me that you didn't like what I posted (my music sucks, why am I posting so many pictures of tits, leave Chas alone, blah blah blah).

Yeah, let's make it about me.

Seacrest · **Posted:** Thu Apr 17, 2014 4:02 pm

Chus wrote:

Yeah, let's make it about me.

Where do you want me to start?

Btw, the midday show still hasn't come out of the tail spin that Meat and Larry put it in.

Scorehead · **Posted:** Fri Apr 18, 2014 12:58 am

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

You said that Mitch won't fire Joos (your actual words). Only bigots like yourself would come up with such an absurd premise.

Does the United Negro College Fund get under your skin, as well?

That's not exactly what I said.

False.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=156&p=1970678

Scorehead wrote:

Chus wrote:

Scorehead wrote:

Meatpants has absolutely zero value to The Score. No one tunes in to listen to him. I doubt that Mitch would launch him though.

The Joo thing again, huh?

Mitch hires 'em but doesn't fire 'em.

Here, you insinuate that Mitch hired Bruce simply because he is a member of the tribe.

posting.php?mode=quote&f=156&p=1965408

Scorehead wrote:

Levine is terrible. Awful voice & he's a tool who doesn't get along with anyone. He's had words with a few Score guys who he has co-hosted with already. I have no idea why Mitch hired him. Wait...never mind...

Those are the words of a bigot. Why don't you just own it?

I'm going to bookmark this thread, so the next time somebody calls you a bigot, and you deny it and ask for proof, I will have it.

How is it bigoted to acknowledge that Joo's take care of their fellow Man? I don't know what you do for a living, but I'm guessing that you don't interact with many Joo's on a regular basis. A largre percentage of my distributors & customers are owned by Joo's. I have done business with these guys for 30+ years & have become close friends with many of them & their Families. I know their Wives & Children. The fact that they are Jooish never enters my mind. It doesn't matter. We have lunch & dinner together regularly.
It isn't racist or bigoted to acknowledge that the Joo's take care of their own & hire each other & protect each other. If you know any Joo's they will tell you this. I don't blame them after what they went through. I would do the same thing.

I like the Joo's & the balcks more than you do!!!

Make sure that you bookmark this thread, because this CSFMB business is serious business!

March WSCR -VS- WMVP Ratings Results

Who is online