It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 6:40 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
billypootons wrote:
im no NBA cap guru, but to trade boozer the bulls would have to take on a lot of bad contracts in return thus thwarting the melo pursuit... right?

it looks like there is some overlap between the start of free-agency and the amnesty deadline... so technically couldnt the bulls get a sign and trade done with the knicks and then amenesty boozer?

melo is a pipe dream but its the only realistic shot at having a team that is feasibly a title contender...


Yea I can't see them getting anything for Boozer except bad contracts (thus negating their flexibility) and I'd be shocked if Phil would take him back in a sign and trade. Jerry will have to eat the 16.8M.

As for Melo? A long shot at best and not sure he'd be worth the cost either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
cpguy wrote:
billypootons wrote:
im no NBA cap guru, but to trade boozer the bulls would have to take on a lot of bad contracts in return thus thwarting the melo pursuit... right?

it looks like there is some overlap between the start of free-agency and the amnesty deadline... so technically couldnt the bulls get a sign and trade done with the knicks and then amenesty boozer?

melo is a pipe dream but its the only realistic shot at having a team that is feasibly a title contender...


Yea I can't see them getting anything for Boozer except bad contracts (thus negating their flexibility) and I'd be shocked if Phil would take him back in a sign and trade. Jerry will have to eat the 16.8M.

As for Melo? A long shot at best and not sure he'd be worth the cost either.

The Knicks might do it so Melo doesn't walk for nothing. New York wants as much money coming off the books in 2015 as they can get. Boozer would only help that issue.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Douchebag wrote:
cpguy wrote:
billypootons wrote:
im no NBA cap guru, but to trade boozer the bulls would have to take on a lot of bad contracts in return thus thwarting the melo pursuit... right?

it looks like there is some overlap between the start of free-agency and the amnesty deadline... so technically couldnt the bulls get a sign and trade done with the knicks and then amenesty boozer?

melo is a pipe dream but its the only realistic shot at having a team that is feasibly a title contender...


Yea I can't see them getting anything for Boozer except bad contracts (thus negating their flexibility) and I'd be shocked if Phil would take him back in a sign and trade. Jerry will have to eat the 16.8M.

As for Melo? A long shot at best and not sure he'd be worth the cost either.

The Knicks might do it so Melo doesn't walk for nothing. New York wants as much money coming off the books in 2015 as they can get. Boozer would only help that issue.


So nothing > Boozer??

Not sure about that one...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
cpguy wrote:
So nothing > Boozer??

Not sure about that one...

It's all about expiring contracts.

The Knicks are going to tank big time next year. They've got Amare and Chandler coming off the books next season, and if they acquire Boozer also, that will come to around $40 million in money to spend in free agency in 2015.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 9:08 pm
Posts: 5753
Location: Crown Point, IN
pizza_Place: Beggars
Douchebag wrote:
cpguy wrote:
So nothing > Boozer??

Not sure about that one...

It's all about expiring contracts.

The Knicks are going to tank big time next year. They've got Amare and Chandler coming off the books next season, and if they acquire Boozer also, that will come to around $40 million in money to spend in free agency in 2015.


But if they let Melo walk for nothing, don't they get all that cap space immediately? Why waste it on Boozer??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Time to start calling him what he is


Carlos Boozer's Expiring Contract


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
The Knicks would need the Bulls to take back some contracts and they would need some draft picks. Without giving up Taj I really can't see how it is possible.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
Image

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2014 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Apologist wrote:
Image


still the greatest basketball gif ever

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
IkeSouth wrote:
Apologist wrote:
Image


still the greatest basketball gif ever

I humbly disagree...

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2014 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57234
Apologist wrote:
Image

:lol: :lol: :lol: that one still gets me every time.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group