It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 10:14 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 6:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
For anyone whoever claimed Jerry didnt come as close to running MLB as one could possibly do, now he is trying to stop Rob Manfred from becoming the new commish.

Jerry believes the 30 owners should be able to select the new commish.

So the guy who has been baseballs COO , a Lawyer, graduated from Harvard and Cornell, not good enough for Jerry? There isn't anyone close to as qualified as the guy who has been the COO for 12 years.

Yet, the former used car salesman, who ran the brewers like a local softball team was a good hire for Jerry, because he was a pawn for Jerry and Manfred wont be.

“What I have said about Rob is none of your business,” Mr. Reinsdorf said in a telephone interview, interjecting an expletive.

Mr. Reinsdorf said he “had never said a bad word about Bud,” who he said “was the game’s best commissioner.” But he said that he believed that the owners — not Mr. Selig — should be in charge of picking the next one.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 8:27 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Don't you think he's right though? The commissioner works for the owners. In the time of Kenesaw Mountain Landis the commissioner was all powerful and held sway over the owners, the players, and everything else associated with MLB. That isn't the case today. It hasn't been since the advent of the player's union.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Point of order, Bud Selig ran the Brewers with some pretty high standards in the '70s and '80s. It was his daughter and his son-in-law that ran the ship aground in the '90s.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Jerry's pick

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQueOpYz11s&feature=player_embedded

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don't you think he's right though? The commissioner works for the owners. In the time of Kenesaw Mountain Landis the commissioner was all powerful and held sway over the owners, the players, and everything else associated with MLB. That isn't the case today. It hasn't been since the advent of the player's union.



IN theory, the commish should not work for the owners.

I think we are seeing that now in the NBA. The commish should have the power to do what is right for the game. That does include Jerry making a profit.

Of course the owners should vote on the proposal by Bud.

But to be honest I dont think Jerry gives a shit who is the commish, as long as they listen to him and they continue to try and keep spending under control, because thats all he cares about.

He sees the big TV deals and he knows one is coming to Chicago and it's not for him.

You can tell me he doesnt try and angle everything for his club that he does for MLB, but the absolute NO to Cuban, the changes to the International Cap, the Draft cap, remember Jerry trying to get the ISFA to buy Wrigley...ughhh...or even promoting Ricketts over some much more qualified Cubs buyers....It's always an alterior motive and thus when I see that person picking the new baseball commish, yes, I question it.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Curious Hair wrote:
Point of order, Bud Selig ran the Brewers with some pretty high standards in the '70s and '80s. It was his daughter and his son-in-law that ran the ship aground in the '90s.


Are you kidding me? They played in a softball field and it wasn't even mostly his money.

That place was a drunken ball room party.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
County Stadium wasn't really better or worse than most ballparks of its time. In fact, I'd rank it ahead of dumps like the Kingdome and Olympic Stadium by sheer dint of being open-air and natural grass. It was also built for baseball, more than can be said for the concrete donuts.

And I know the Brewers have a reputation as a crappy franchise, most of which is their own doing by sucking through the '90s and half of the 2000s and dwelling on '82 like it's the only season they've ever had, but they were a well-run organization for a while. Selig was just in way over his head as commissioner.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:18 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
bigfan wrote:
He sees the big TV deals and he knows one is coming to Chicago and it's not for him.


It's difficult to say how it's all going to play out, how a Cub Tv deal will work, what happens with Comcast and the rates, etc. But I'll just take a wild guess that Jerry with the Sox and Bulls and a strong alliance with Rocky Wirtz will somehow come out smelling like a rose.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
It's interesting that you mention Rocky Wirtz (and by extension, the Blackhawks), because they're a big part of this. People seem to assume that the McDonough relationship would bring the Hawks over to the new channel for winter programming (because honestly, with everything else spoken for, what the fuck else would they show for six months?) and that it would be just peachy, freeing up CSN nights for the Bulls and getting them off the overflow or channel 26. Incidentally, I'm sure I'm not the only one who noticed that the Bulls were getting kicked to the overflow feed much more often than the Hawks were this year.

But Wirtz and Reinsdorf are in together on the United Center, they're trying to develop the area and get new practice facilities (Bulls got theirs, Hawks working on theirs) around it. It would make no sense to mess around with TV rights.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Don't you think he's right though? The commissioner works for the owners. In the time of Kenesaw Mountain Landis the commissioner was all powerful and held sway over the owners, the players, and everything else associated with MLB. That isn't the case today. It hasn't been since the advent of the player's union.




The commish should not be working for the owners , that's a recipe for disaster and bad for the game.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Maybe, but the fact is that the modern commissioner is basically a league's CEO.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 4:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Curious Hair wrote:
Maybe, but the fact is that the modern commissioner is basically a league's CEO.


Or the baseball owners lapdog.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
This one is, yes, but the job doesn't ahve to be. Stern and Bettman both did a lot of marshaling of their owners/bosses.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
How would you pick a commissioner? A fan vote? Appointed by the President?

The owners pick a commissioner. Jerry is a powerful owner so he is going to get a lot of input into the matter and a lot of people are allies with him who probably have similar interests.

The commissioner has one job, make the owners and players the most amount of money. That is why for all the complaining about Goodell the owners and players both fully support him. He's growing the paychecks of everyone.

Jerry will pick someone who will do the same, and also screw over the Cubs right?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:23 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The commissioner has one job, make the owners and players the most amount of money.


I think the first half of that is correct. If the owners and their commissioner could get away with paying the players nothing, they would. The commissioner's real goal is to pay the players just enough to keep the money train rolling with no work stoppages.

The players have their own "commissioner" in the head of the player's union. His job is to make the most money for the players. And his real goal is for the owners to make just enough (or not lose so much) that the league does not contract.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the first half of that is correct. If the owners and their commissioner could get away with paying the players nothing, they would. The commissioner's real goal is to pay the players just enough to keep the money train rolling with no work stoppages.
I guess that is true for baseball. In other sports, player pay is a percentage of total money earned.

Still, you'd have to imagine that if the goal was to pay the players the least amount in baseball, some sort of salary cap would have been put in.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How would you pick a commissioner? A fan vote? Appointed by the President?

The owners pick a commissioner. Jerry is a powerful owner so he is going to get a lot of input into the matter and a lot of people are allies with him who probably have similar interests.

With Selig gone doesn't a considerable amount of "power" erode?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 6:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How would you pick a commissioner? A fan vote? Appointed by the President?

The owners pick a commissioner. Jerry is a powerful owner so he is going to get a lot of input into the matter and a lot of people are allies with him who probably have similar interests.

With Selig gone doesn't a considerable amount of "power" erode?
If he is as powerful as some say, he has a lot of important relationships throughout baseball.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the first half of that is correct. If the owners and their commissioner could get away with paying the players nothing, they would. The commissioner's real goal is to pay the players just enough to keep the money train rolling with no work stoppages.
I guess that is true for baseball. In other sports, player pay is a percentage of total money earned.

Still, you'd have to imagine that if the goal was to pay the players the least amount in baseball, some sort of salary cap would have been put in.



I think the major difference there is the strength of the MLB player's union. NFL players allow their union to be run by their own guys who are probably suffering from CTE and thus enter into bad CBAs.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the major difference there is the strength of the MLB player's union. NFL players allow their union to be run by their own guys who are probably suffering from CTE and thus enter into bad CBAs.
I don't think it's so much the strength of the union, but the strength of the guys on both sides of the ownership spectrum. Those who want to pay huge amounts of money, and those who want to pay almost nothing are pretty closely aligned in baseball. Both make lots of money for the same reasons.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79545
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think the major difference there is the strength of the MLB player's union. NFL players allow their union to be run by their own guys who are probably suffering from CTE and thus enter into bad CBAs.
I don't think it's so much the strength of the union, but the strength of the guys on both sides of the ownership spectrum. Those who want to pay huge amounts of money, and those who want to pay almost nothing are pretty closely aligned in baseball. Both make lots of money for the same reasons.



I don't really think that's true. I just think the small market owners allow themselves to be intimidated by the Reinsdorfs and the Steinbrenners. Bill James has written about the competitive imbalances based on local television deals. But the Yankees can't get paid for a game in which no other team is playing. The logical answer is to split the TV money between the two teams that play each game. Obviously, the Dodgers and Yankees would still get more money since they would receive half of a bigger pie, but it would even things out a whole lot and eliminate any need for an arbitrary and un-American salary cap.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92039
Location: To the left of my post
If the small market owners didn't like the setup, they'd get it changed. The only thing they seemed to fear was a salary floor.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
How would you pick a commissioner? A fan vote? Appointed by the President?

The owners pick a commissioner. Jerry is a powerful owner so he is going to get a lot of input into the matter and a lot of people are allies with him who probably have similar interests.

With Selig gone doesn't a considerable amount of "power" erode?
If he is as powerful as some say, he has a lot of important relationships throughout baseball.


Jerry is chairman of the new owners committee, so basically if Jerry doesnt like you, you are out. SEE Marc Cuban.

Thus, when you buy a team or relocate a team, Jerry needs to rubber stamp it.

So, from the get go, you owe jerry a favor if he suggests you would be a solid owner.

I know some here scoff as the idea that Jerry does things that might be surpress the Cubs, but just having him review the potential owners for the cubs, was a massive conflict of interests.

Of course, his suggestions that the ISFA buy Wrigley, or his self admitted desire to create a draft cap, then an international draft cap for years, that just happen to all come through when Theo started to abuse the existing system, these all just happen to coincide.

But who would think he does things to screw with the Cubs, that would be crazy.

Some might even say allowing the 42 year old kid whose Daddy has $2 Bill and tommy has zero experience in running anything close to an event/sports/entertainment/facility type of gig alone might not have been the best person/ownership group for the Cubs to truely flourish.

Some here might even have stories of Jerry running other potential, but more than capable, owners out of the game, because he didnt like them.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55941
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
I'm so glad he didn't get to infect the NHL like he wanted to.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm so glad he didn't get to infect the NHL like he wanted to.


The public attempts of undermining issues and people are only compounded by those that dont see the light of day.

Hey, but when you pay Jay Williams after he crashes a bike, when you pay for Bill Cartwrights surgery, when you give Randy Brown a job when he was broke, all the good deeds outweigh the bad ones and it's all ok then, in his book. Pretty much the same book Donald Sterling uses.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
asked some REALLY SMART PEOPLE today about this issue and there really isn't an issue that Manfred differs from Jerry in his opinion.

Jerry just wants to keep his power. Nothing more.

He wants to select to the next commish. He wants the new commish to know that Jerry said it was OK.

Jerry of course is chairing the committee now to find the new commissoner, with the Phillies owner. lol

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
I am just disappointed Biggie couldn't reply in the thread I had started about this. :(

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
I am just disappointed Biggie couldn't reply in the thread I had started about this. :(


I was unaware, please direct us to the thread.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30318
bigfan wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
I am just disappointed Biggie couldn't reply in the thread I had started about this. :(


I was unaware, please direct us to the thread.

viewtopic.php?f=92&t=87030

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Yup, Hawg had it.

I am just glad some in the media are getting to the heart of the issue is that Jerry doesnt want to lose power as he really has no issues with Manfred's methodology on the issues. Manfred probably is the only person who is as well versed on the labor issues as Jerry, maybe even more so and the bottom line is that Jerry isn't liking the fact a smarter guy might be stepping into the role of leader.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group