It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 343 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So IMU, should we expect the Cubs first pick to to be the best hitter in this years draft? No excuses about how they wanted to sign other players if he proves not to be?


The Cubs could have drafted Jackson, Gordon, Conforto, and Schwarber and I'd still hate it.

I want pitching.

That being said, I can not like the pick AND be a fan of signing as many arms into the organization as possible.
Ok, so it's already a bad pick then. No reason to even judge it later on then!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I really don't understand what you're doing. Pulling a Baby McNown?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
I really don't understand what you're doing. Pulling a Baby McNown?
It's simple. According to just about everyone, the Cubs drafted a player higher than they should have so they could sign him under slot and instead be more aggressive later on. This was pretty much confirmed when he signed first and others behind him got paid more money. That means the draft should be judged on whether the players they then signed over slot had meaningful success in MLB.

You just think it was a terrible pick, so either way you don't think they did a good job. I want to give Theo the ability to show that his overdrafting in the first round was the right choice by setting the parameters for success.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I think the player is a bad pick. I think the strategy behind why they did it is sound.

I'm just not sure why they didn't take Hoffman instead of Schwarber. The discount would have been about the same, no?

If Schwarber ends up being close to Bryant, I'm wrong on every count. But again...his high floor / low ceiling prevents that, I believe.

.220 with 20-25 HR with no defensive value and no baserunning value isn't so great.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
I think the player is a bad pick. I think the strategy behind why they did it is sound.
So that is why it is to be judged based on how much meaningful production you get from those who were picked. That is the whole point.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I think the player is a bad pick. I think the strategy behind why they did it is sound.
So that is why it is to be judged based on how much meaningful production you get from those who were picked. That is the whole point.

I see.

The way you had phrased your original post is why I commented the way I did.

Simply that it is always interesting to see what production, if any, you get out of your picks. Regardless of the strategy behind each pick.

This is why baseball is the most entertaining sport. So much to watch and follow, even outside of the 3 hour window each day that the major league club plays a game.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Indians and 7th rounder Simeon Lucas (Grant HS) agreed to a $168.2k bonus. The deal is for slot.

The Giants and 5th rounder RHP Sam Coonrod (Southern IL) agreed to a $330k bonus. The deal is for slot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Indians also agreed with 4th rounder Sam Hentges on a $700k bonus. The deal is about $300k over slot.

That's (literally) a big loss for your Hogs, Hawger but you have to be real happy with how the draft went. Hentges will probably be the only guy they lose from a really good recruiting class as it doesn't look like McKinney is going to sign. Hogs win it all in 2016!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30324
Keyser Soze wrote:
The Indians also agreed with 4th rounder Sam Hentges on a $700k bonus. The deal is about $300k over slot.

That's (literally) a big loss for your Hogs, Hawger but you have to be real happy with how the draft went. Hentges will probably be the only guy they lose from a really good recruiting class as it doesn't look like McKinney is going to sign. Hogs win it all in 2016!

8)

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I really don't understand what you're doing. Pulling a Baby McNown?
It's simple. According to just about everyone, the Cubs drafted a player higher than they should have so they could sign him under slot and instead be more aggressive later on.

Under slot signing is roughly the equivalent of trading down. Pretty simple concept. He could've been the 2nd player on their board like they said but MLBs assbackwards thinking in everything prevents them from trading down.

Quote:
This was pretty much confirmed when he signed first and others behind him got paid more money. That means the draft should be judged on whether the players they then signed over slot had meaningful success in MLB.

Duh? They'll be judged on under slot ones too!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
Kirkwood wrote:
Under slot signing is roughly the equivalent of trading down. Pretty simple concept. He could've been the 2nd player on their board like they said but MLBs assbackwards thinking in everything prevents them from trading down.
Yes, and we should judge more heavily when someone trades down.

However, if you are saying he was the 2nd player on the board, then we'll judge him that way instead. It just can't be one or the other. If he doesn't become a top player in this draft it was a bad pick regardless of what the others who signed above slot do.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Rick, you don't make the rules. Sorry, bud.

There are multiple ways this can work out in the favor of the Cubs.

It isn't a simple 'pass / fail' based on one player.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
Rick, you don't make the rules. Sorry, bud.

There are multiple ways this can work out in the favor of the Cubs.

It isn't a simple 'pass / fail' based on one player.
It normally is a pass / fail based on one player though. The Cubs strategy seemed to be to draft a player above his deserved position so they could use the cost savings down the line in the draft.

Logically then, you'd have to judge that strategy based on how those other players work out and much less on the guy they drafted first. However, the argument now seems to be that the Cubs just got really lucky in that the player they thought was the second best in the draft also ended up being significantly cheaper.

You just can't play both sides of it. If he was considered their #2 player, then we judge the pick on his production alone. However, I think we all know that if the Cubs had the #2 pick it wouldn't be him.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You just can't play both sides of it. If he was considered their #2 player, then we judge the pick on his production alone. However, I think we all know that if the Cubs had the #2 pick it wouldn't be him.

I believe this to be correct.

But this can be a win in multiple ways:

1) Kyle Schwarber turns out to be deserving of the second overall pick and becomes pretty damn good. The high school pitchers do not matter.
2) Schwarber turns out to be serviceable, or is eventually flipped for some decent pitching help. At least one of the high school pitchers picked in the middle rounds contributes positively to the major league club.
3) Schwarber flames out, but 2 or 3 of the high school pitchers turn into very good contributors to the major league club, or can be flipped for a great player in an offseason or deadline deal.

Obviously, every Cubs fan wants Schwarber to be an amazing left fielder for the Cubs and have these high school pitchers become great as well. But baseball draft picks are the least predictable of the four major sports.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Under slot signing is roughly the equivalent of trading down. Pretty simple concept. He could've been the 2nd player on their board like they said but MLBs assbackwards thinking in everything prevents them from trading down.
Yes, and we should judge more heavily when someone trades down.

Why?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
1) Kyle Schwarber turns out to be deserving of the second overall pick and becomes pretty damn good. The high school pitchers do not matter.
2) Schwarber turns out to be serviceable, or is eventually flipped for some decent pitching help. At least one of the high school pitchers picked in the middle rounds contributes positively to the major league club.
3) Schwarber flames out, but 2 or 3 of the high school pitchers turn into very good contributors to the major league club, or can be flipped for a great player in an offseason or deadline deal.
The only real difference here is that you are saying if he ends up being worth the second pick in the draft then it was a good pick. I can't argue with that but it seems pretty obvious that any pick would be worth it if that happened.

2 and 3 are exactly what I'm trying to quantify.
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Under slot signing is roughly the equivalent of trading down. Pretty simple concept. He could've been the 2nd player on their board like they said but MLBs assbackwards thinking in everything prevents them from trading down.
Yes, and we should judge more heavily when someone trades down.

Why?
Don't make me find some of your thoughts on the Bears and some of the first round picks they have made. Either by trading down, or "overdrafting" you lose the value of the pick. If this guy was a top 15 pick, and he went 4th then he should be judged more heavily. It's a great pick if he actually is the 2nd best player in the draft, but if he ends up being the 15th best then what they got for him must be pretty good to make up for the value lost.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I don't think we're really saying different things here. You're correct in the analysis...but as a Cubs fan...I don't have to pick a lane. I can be happy if this works out in several different ways.

I just really wish the Sox would have swept the Cubs in 2013. :)

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
immessedup17 wrote:
I just really wish the Sox would have swept the Cubs in 2013. :)
Why? The draft would have ended up the exact same. The guy the Cubs picked was their #2 choice.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
immessedup17 wrote:
I just really wish the Sox would have swept the Cubs in 2013. :)
Why? The draft would have ended up the exact same. The guy the Cubs picked was their #2 choice.

Let's put the gloves down.

immessedup17 wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You just can't play both sides of it. If he was considered their #2 player, then we judge the pick on his production alone. However, I think we all know that if the Cubs had the #2 pick it wouldn't be him.

I believe this to be correct.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 9:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92060
Location: To the left of my post
I was just making fun of Saint Theo.

I'm sure I'll get some pushback from someone that he actually was their 2nd choice and the Cubs weren't lying.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23840
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
As boring as IMU-BRick spats are, they're fucking Lincoln-Douglas debates compared to listing every single pick in the draft's over/under slot value signings.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 12:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Dodgers and RHP Grant Holmes agreed to a $2.5M bonus. The deal is about $520k over slot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
KDdidit wrote:
As boring as IMU-BRick spats are, they're fucking Lincoln-Douglas debates compared to listing every single pick in the draft's over/under slot value signings.

Is someone holding a gun to your head forcing you to read them?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 1:54 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23840
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
RFDC wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
As boring as IMU-BRick spats are, they're fucking Lincoln-Douglas debates compared to listing every single pick in the draft's over/under slot value signings.

Is someone holding a gun to your head forcing you to read them?

I can't find some things about the 2014 draft worth reading and other things useless copy-pasting tripe?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Mariners and OF Alex Jackson agreed to a $4.2M bonus. The deal is about $625k over slot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 8:57 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23840
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Thanks signing slot Shark!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Mets and OF Michael Conforto agreed to a $2.97M bonus. The deal is for slot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 8:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The D'Bags and RHP Touki Toussaint agreed on a $2.7M bonus. The deal is about $362k above slot.

That's a great deal for the D'Bags. Right, Reader? :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 8:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
The Reds and 11th round C Mitch Trees (Springfield Sacred Heart Griffin) agree on a $300k bonus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 2014 MLB Draft
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2014 11:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Keyser Soze wrote:
The D'Bags and RHP Touki Toussaint agreed on a $2.7M bonus. The deal is about $362k above slot.

That's a great deal for the D'Bags. Right, Reader? :D


:lol: :lol: :lol:

What'd you think of that kid Atterbury?

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 343 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group