It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:58 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 211 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
FavreFan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
"And in the four states where marijuana has been legalized for recreational use, there's a growing concern that loaded drivers running to 7-11 for another pint of Americone Dream is becoming an issue."

Why is this a problem unless there is data that shows increased accidents also?

Also, why are they trying to make weed zero tolerance but allow you to be somewhat drunk when driving? I'm pretty sure there are multiple studies suggesting, if not outright declaring, that weed is less dangerous to drive under the influence of than alcohol.


i've always said that drunk driving leads to arrest accidents debauchery unplanned pregnancies and all kinds of horrible fates. stoned driving leads to taco bell.

but then again i do remember at least 1-2 people in my life who couldn't handle weed. i mean like SCREEEEAAAAMMMMM AND BREAK SHIT IN THE JUANA/TUBES ROOM IN GALESBURG SLFHASDHFDSF AHHHH!!!! couldn't take weed. but that was galesburg IL where in under 5 minutes at the hotel bar with a white russian in hand i figured out all of their hard drugs come from peoria. mm-hmmm.

otherwise, man, if there was a way a pot breathalyzer could get people who are actually way too high to drive that's actually great, cuz right now if cops get piss/blood/whatever i'm pretty damn sure you can be nailed for a DUI/weed for just having smoked in the last 20-30 days or whatever. i mean once weed is in your system it's either there or not and i dont think piss hair or blood can tell you when you smoked as much as you just had in some period of time up to 30 days or i guess months and months and months if it's hair. maybe i'm wrong but that's kind of shitty, and if the pot breathalyzers just dump you in the "piss/bleed for us" category where they can basically have evidence to nail any pothead with a DUI whenever they're bored, fuck that. but if these things can actually tell you when someone's too stoned (which is i think where officers' judgment usually comes in) then you've got something.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
How do you know it's being shouted through a message board. And is that not a logical, obvious rebuttal with how our current system is?
It just makes it an impossible question to answer then, even though the science indicates that while marijuana is clearly safer to drive on, marijuana is more dangerous than driving sober.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Come up with a better solution then.

Allowing people to drive no matter how high they are is not one.

You and I already solved this. If you're not driving fucked up, theres nothing wrong. You're free to go.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Right. And unlike with alcohol, at that point there really is no evidence of guilt or innocence either way. It's basically just the cops word. Of course, a good lawyer will probably easily get that thrown out, meanwhile a public defender won't give a fuck and poor people will end up pleading guilty. Don't we have enough laws targeting the poor already?
I don't see the problem if it is all on tape.

We might as well not have laws if we are going to worry about bad public defenders.

Honestly, you guys are arguing that it should be legal to drive no matter how many marijuana cigarettes you have, I believe the word is, toked?

I've been around enough people who are high to know I wouldn't want them driving next to me on the expressway.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Come up with a better solution then.

Allowing people to drive no matter how high they are is not one.

You and I already solved this. If you're not driving fucked up, theres nothing wrong. You're free to go.
Bagels is against the field sobriety test solution.

If you aren't driving erratically and you are able to prove you are capable of driving then let them go. Then, once we have a test for the acceptable levels of thc we can treat it just like alcohol.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Come up with a better solution then.

Allowing people to drive no matter how high they are is not one.

You and I already solved this. If you're not driving fucked up, theres nothing wrong. You're free to go.
Bagels is against the field sobriety test solution.

If you aren't driving erratically and you are able to prove you are capable of driving then let them go. Then, once we have a test for the acceptable levels of thc we can treat it just like alcohol.

If I'm not driving erratically, why should I have to submit to Officer Brick's request for a field sobriety test? The short answer is I shouldn't.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32128
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
How do you know it's being shouted through a message board. And is that not a logical, obvious rebuttal with how our current system is?
It just makes it an impossible question to answer then, even though the science indicates that while marijuana is clearly safer to drive on, marijuana is more dangerous than driving sober.


just because it's more dangerous than driving sober doesn't mean it's a problem.
driving while tired is pretty dangerous and i don't see scientists working to develop a handheld device for officers to gauge how many hours of sleep you got last night


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
If I'm not driving erratically, why should I have to submit to Officer Brick's request for a field sobriety test? The short answer is I shouldn't.
That is how it works though if they suspect you of being on drugs. As you have made it clear though, I wouldn't even know you were high if I was sitting next to you for hours, so I don't think you have much to worry about.

This will only get people like me who probably don't have the capability to drive while high on marijuana cigarettes and would be noticeable.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
just because it's more dangerous than driving sober doesn't mean it's a problem.
driving while tired is pretty dangerous and i don't see scientists working to develop a handheld device for officers to gauge how many hours of sleep you got last night
So, just to be clear, your solution is to allow anyone to get as high as they want on marijuana doobies and drive?

X is dangerous too so let's allow Y is rarely a good reason.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:46 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Chus wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are multiple studies suggesting, if not outright declaring, that weed is less dangerous to drive under the influence of than alcohol.


Score one for Team Weed.
So you admit then that there is at least some danger into driving around while stoned? This is kind of like saying playing with matches is less dangerous than playing with a toaster in the bathtub.

I'm not sure of the danger of driving around after having 2 beers. I know that doesn't affect me a whole lot. I also don't think that somebody who takes 3 or 4 hits of weed is lethal behind the wheel either, but somebody who just smoked an entire joint and can barely keep his eyes open, IMO, is just as dangerous if not more so than the guy who has a BAC of .16 as he leaves the bar.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38904
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
How do you know it's being shouted through a message board. And is that not a logical, obvious rebuttal with how our current system is?
It just makes it an impossible question to answer then, even though the science indicates that while marijuana is clearly safer to drive on, marijuana is more dangerous than driving sober.


just because it's more dangerous than driving sober doesn't mean it's a problem.
driving while tired is pretty dangerous and i don't see scientists working to develop a handheld device for officers to gauge how many hours of sleep you got last night

As more states are poised to legalize medicinal marijuana, it's looking like dope is playing a larger role as a cause of fatal traffic accidents.

Columbia University researchers performing a toxicology examination of nearly 24,000 driving fatalities concluded that marijuana contributed to 12% of traffic deaths in 2010, tripled from a decade earlier.

NHTSA studies have found drugged driving to be particularly prevalent among younger motorists. One in eight high school seniors responding to a 2010 survey admitted to driving after smoking marijuana. Nearly a quarter of drivers killed in drug-related car crashes were younger than 25. Likewise, nearly half of fatally injured drivers who tested positive for marijuana were younger than 25.

A National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study found that 4% of drivers were high during the day and more than 6% at night, and that nighttime figure more than doubled on weekends.

Colorado has seen a spike in driving fatalities in which marijuana alone was involved, according to Insurance.com. The trend started in 2009 — the year medical marijuana dispensaries were effectively legalized at the state level.

NHTSA and the National Institute on Drug Abuse are now in the final months of a three-year, half-million-dollar cooperative study to determine the impact of inhaled marijuana on driving performance. Tests observe participants who ingest a low dose of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, a high dose and a placebo to assess the effects on performance, decision-making, motor control, risk-taking behavior and divided-attention tasks.

The study is being performed using what NHTSA calls "the world's most advanced driving simulator," the University of Iowa's National Advanced Driving Simulator, which was previously used to study the effects of alcohol on driving.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32128
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
So, just to be clear, your solution is to allow anyone to get as high as they want on marijuana doobies and drive?


yes, my solution to your non-existent problem is to let people get as high as they want

they can ingest as much caffeine as they want too, just because i'm a nice guy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
yes, my solution to your non-existent problem is to let people get as high as they want
The problem is not non-existent.

Ok though, we have a vote for no laws against driving while high on the reefer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I've been around enough people who are high to know I wouldn't want them driving next to me on the expressway.


and you're legendarily all about public transportation, so what do you want these people to do? never leave home?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
badrogue17 wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
How do you know it's being shouted through a message board. And is that not a logical, obvious rebuttal with how our current system is?
It just makes it an impossible question to answer then, even though the science indicates that while marijuana is clearly safer to drive on, marijuana is more dangerous than driving sober.


just because it's more dangerous than driving sober doesn't mean it's a problem.
driving while tired is pretty dangerous and i don't see scientists working to develop a handheld device for officers to gauge how many hours of sleep you got last night

As more states are poised to legalize medicinal marijuana, it's looking like dope is playing a larger role as a cause of fatal traffic accidents.

Columbia University researchers performing a toxicology examination of nearly 24,000 driving fatalities concluded that marijuana contributed to 12% of traffic deaths in 2010, tripled from a decade earlier.

NHTSA studies have found drugged driving to be particularly prevalent among younger motorists. One in eight high school seniors responding to a 2010 survey admitted to driving after smoking marijuana. Nearly a quarter of drivers killed in drug-related car crashes were younger than 25. Likewise, nearly half of fatally injured drivers who tested positive for marijuana were younger than 25.

A National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study found that 4% of drivers were high during the day and more than 6% at night, and that nighttime figure more than doubled on weekends.

Colorado has seen a spike in driving fatalities in which marijuana alone was involved, according to Insurance.com. The trend started in 2009 — the year medical marijuana dispensaries were effectively legalized at the state level.

NHTSA and the National Institute on Drug Abuse are now in the final months of a three-year, half-million-dollar cooperative study to determine the impact of inhaled marijuana on driving performance. Tests observe participants who ingest a low dose of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, a high dose and a placebo to assess the effects on performance, decision-making, motor control, risk-taking behavior and divided-attention tasks.

The study is being performed using what NHTSA calls "the world's most advanced driving simulator," the University of Iowa's National Advanced Driving Simulator, which was previously used to study the effects of alcohol on driving.

Sounds like bullshit. At no point in the article do they even attempt to explain how they would know somebody is high at the time of an accident.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32128
pizza_Place: Milano's
FavreFan wrote:
Sounds like bullshit. At no point in the article do they even attempt to explain how they would know somebody is high at the time of an accident.


Quote:
It makes sense that loosening restrictions on pot would result in a higher percentage of drivers involved in fatal traffic accidents having smoked the drug at some point over the past few days or weeks. You’d also expect to find that a higher percentage of churchgoers, good Samaritans and soup kitchen volunteers would have pot in their system. You’d expect a similar result among any large sampling of people. This doesn’t necessarily mean that marijuana caused or was even a contributing factor to accidents, traffic violations or fatalities.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Chus wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I'm pretty sure there are multiple studies suggesting, if not outright declaring, that weed is less dangerous to drive under the influence of than alcohol.


Score one for Team Weed.
So you admit then that there is at least some danger into driving around while stoned? This is kind of like saying playing with matches is less dangerous than playing with a toaster in the bathtub.

I'm not sure of the danger of driving around after having 2 beers. I know that doesn't affect me a whole lot. I also don't think that somebody who takes 3 or 4 hits of weed is lethal behind the wheel either, but somebody who just smoked an entire joint and can barely keep his eyes open, IMO, is just as dangerous if not more so than the guy who has a BAC of .16 as he leaves the bar.

I personally have never been too high to drive. Weed just isn't as potent as you're making it sound. The analogy that one joint is equivalent to .16 BAC is reefer madness levels of stupid.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
sinicalypse wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I've been around enough people who are high to know I wouldn't want them driving next to me on the expressway.


and you're legendarily all about public transportation, so what do you want these people to do? never leave home?
Take Uber.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
FavreFan wrote:
The analogy that one joint is equivalent to .16 BAC is reefer madness levels of stupid.
So you have tested this? I haven't. I just know that I have seen plenty of people smoke weed that would not have been able to operate a car safely after they had done so.

You took that post way to literally. I didn't mean that 1 joint = .18 BAC. If you are smoking Ike's weed its more like 12 joints = .08 BAC.

My point is that somebody who is completely and totally stoned is in fact a dangerous driver. Just like somebody who is drunk. Or tired. Or on Rx meds...

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32128
pizza_Place: Milano's
Frank Coztansa wrote:
. If you are smoking Ike's weed its more like 12 joints = .08 BAC


:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I wouldn't really trust a guy who got so stoned off a joint he couldn't drive. I'm fine with arresting people like that now that I think about it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Again, too literal. There are people that sometimes get pretty drunk off of two beers. Especially if they are craft brews. I've seen people get buzzed off 3 Bud Lights. I've seen people get stoned to the point of where they are useless off of a couple of bong hits. Forget the one joint thing. It doesn't matter how somebody gets higher than a kite. My point is if they are at that point and behind the wheel, they ARE a danger on the road.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, too literal. There are people that sometimes get pretty drunk off of two beers. Especially if they are craft brews. I've seen people get buzzed off 3 Bud Lights. I've seen people get stoned to the point of where they are useless off of a couple of bong hits. Forget the one joint thing. It doesn't matter how somebody gets higher than a kite. My point is if they are at that point and behind the wheel, they ARE a danger on the road.

This time you are being too literal. :lol:

I'm just sayin I don't trust people that can't take a couple hits of weed without losing their minds. I feel like that's a reasonable position.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:19 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I agree with that. But still...bong hits or 12 of Ike's joints, 3 beers, 12 beers, somebody who has lost their mind should not be behind the wheel regardless of what they are under the influence of.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I agree with that. But still...bong hits or 12 of Ike's joints, 3 beers, 12 beers, somebody who has lost their mind should not be behind the wheel regardless of what they are under the influence of.

By that logic you think the state should revoke Panther's driving privileges?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102662
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I think they should at least look into it :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What is your solution?


i don't really think this is a problem that requires a solution
So driving while high isn't a problem?


i don't think it is, no
do you have some statistics to show me how many fatal injuries have been caused by someone DUI/weed ?

Its a problem because not everyone is responsible or knows their limits

For every regular smoker who smokes a hitter and is fine to drive, there is some kid getting high as fuck and then driving around like an asshole.

Im all for the breathalyzer thing if its accurate and tests only the last 5 hours (or whatever)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
do you have some statistics to show me how many fatal injuries have been caused by someone DUI/weed ?
There are plenty of them, but as we see with everything, people start shouting "You can get high two weeks earlier and test positive!"

Right, those studies are not legit.

Would you take a study seriously if it labeled accidents as DUI's for anyone who had drank in the previous three weeks before the accident?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
I have a buddy. Let's call him Brian. Some of you may have met him.

He can drink no more than a 1/2 drink of hard liquor or maybe two Bud lights before it affects him.

And he knows it so at least the roads are that much safer.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 02, 2014 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32128
pizza_Place: Milano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Its a problem because not everyone is responsible or knows their limits

For every regular smoker who smokes a hitter and is fine to drive, there is some kid getting high as fuck and then driving around like an asshole.

Im all for the breathalyzer thing if its accurate and tests only the last 5 hours (or whatever)


that's a fair stance, unfortunately all the statistics are clouded (ha) in doubt

my point is that i would like to know the scope of this alleged problem before devoting endless resources into preventing it


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 211 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group